If WTA wants Equal prize $ they should play five sets QF on

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by rallyjunkie, Feb 22, 2009.

  1. rallyjunkie

    rallyjunkie Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    317
    If they want equal prize money as the men, the WTA women should play best 3 out of 5 sets from Grand slam QF to the finals. This would show women can do what men do, to some degree, and it would make the matches more interesting and dramatic.

    Why doesn't Billie Jean King ever step up and try to get this done? You want equal prize money, earn it.
     
    #1
  2. skip1969

    skip1969 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,447
    Location:
    Pleasantville
    if you did a search, i am sure you'd come up with a zillion threads about this topic.
     
    #2
  3. naylor

    naylor Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    686
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Yup, matches such as Bartoli - Zvonareva or Williams - Safina going an extra set, or even the full distance are really something to look forward to... 6-1 0-6 6-0 2-6 whatever score you fancy in the last set. With more breaks than holds, plenty of double-faults, plenty of unforced errors, it'd be a thrill a minute!

    I watched the Safina - Williams final for all of three games, as soon as it became evident Safina just could not serve her way out of a paperbag I went to bed.
     
    #3
  4. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    5 sets of current level women's tennis would be excruciating. I don't think anyone woud want to be submitted to that!
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2009
    #4
  5. Sephiroth_FFVII

    Sephiroth_FFVII Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    166
    I agree that women's tennis currently leaves much more to be desired. Plain and simple, I rather watch college men's tennis.

    Making them play best out of 5 sets would just make it worst; excruciating as someone mentioned above.

    Perhaps they need to find other ways to make it more fair for men because lets face it, women managed an average of 70 minutes on court during the Australian Open while men played single sets that lasted longer than that.

    The only solutions I can see are either give the men more money, or push women back to whatever they used to receive :twisted:
     
    #5
  6. federerdomination

    federerdomination Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    705
    If Women went 5 sets, many would prob be so tired that we would start seeing a lot of of breadsticks/bagels in the finals sets
     
    #6
  7. Rickson

    Rickson G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,740
    Location:
    USA
    This topic has been beaten to death and most of us agree that women should play best of 5 sets, men should play best of 3, or women should get paid less. BJK is a huge buttinsky and a known man hater. She doesn't want equal rights, she wants to give men unfair treatment. I can't believe the powers that be caved in to that jerk, Billie Jean King.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2009
    #7
  8. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    maybe it is because of that Michael jackson song.
     
    #8
  9. Rickson

    Rickson G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,740
    Location:
    USA
    I threw one too many men in there.
     
    #9
  10. NandoMania

    NandoMania Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    323
    That's just plain stupid. Women are women. Men are men. Other sports recognize this. Why don't you>? The grand slams are 4 per year. To accurately assess the value of your point (which is that tennis players should be paid by the hour :rolleyes:), we need to count up the actual hours played by all the men and all the woman in all the tournaments and get the average time per match to see whether it's men or women who actually play the more hours per match. If you really want equality, you will do what it takes to get that information in order to test your own conclusion. The French put it this way, rallyjunkle: "Vive la difference!":lol:
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2009
    #10
  11. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    remember at the AO where federer, nadal had to wait for for dokic to finish her 3 set matches before they could take the court ? well they would have to wait a lot longer if the women's matches were best of 5 set matches.
     
    #11
  12. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Maybe two zillion :)
     
    #12
  13. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    OH,,,nooo. please NO 5 sets for women's matches. It will put everyone to sleep. Billie Jean knows this.
     
    #13
  14. dandaman

    dandaman New User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    37
    The only difference for 5 set women's matches would be that the suicide rates would go up.
     
    #14
  15. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    How about 1 setters for the WTA? I'm sick and tired of the sham that is women's tennis since Henin's been gone. Any shmo ranked #546 on the ATP can don a wig right now and dominate women's tennis and be the undisputed GOAT.

    What a waste of valuable prime time television.
     
    #15
  16. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,474
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    They should just play one set, and let the winner progress to the next round.
    I'm sick of being at a stadium having to wait for blah-balh-ova play knjucgbnkbc-ova while I wait for Federer.
     
    #16
  17. NandoMania

    NandoMania Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    323
    I really like watching women's tennis. They are talented and look good.
    Footballer types. *snort, snort* *paw, paw* *scratch, scratch*
     
    #17
  18. Duzza

    Duzza Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Location:
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    I'd rather pay them more to keep them on the court for the shortest time possible. First to 3 games? Could be a little warm up exhibition thing for the men to play afterwards ;)
     
    #18
  19. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    Or, un-align the scheduales at the Grand Slams for Men's and Women's tourneys. See how many people show up to the women's GS....
     
    #19
  20. vince evert

    vince evert New User

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Location:
    Australia
    Yes I agree. The Equal prizemoney issue is a farce right now. When was the last time we saw a classic women's final in the Grand Slams?! Any more one-sided Grand Slam finals as bad as Safina vs Serena Williams (59 minutes) then the ITF and Grand Slam associations should show some balls (pardon the pun) and do something about it.
     
    #20

Share This Page