In 7 Grand Slams Finals between Federer and Nadal

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by makhan10, May 12, 2009.

  1. makhan10

    makhan10 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    370
    in all but one match(except 2006 French Open Final), the winner of first set won the match.
     
    #1
  2. tsongaali

    tsongaali Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    791
    So what's your point?
     
    #2
  3. clayman2000

    clayman2000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,849
    His point is win the first set
     
    #3
  4. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    What a revelation.
     
    #4
  5. iamgoat

    iamgoat Banned

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    485
    What did you expect?
     
    #5
  6. Knightmace

    Knightmace Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    940
    there's only been one gs final that went 3 sets
     
    #6
  7. slicefox

    slicefox Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,275
    Location:
    the hood
    Lmfao.

    Just because it happened in the past doesn't mean winner of first set is guaranteed the match.
     
    #7
  8. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,018

    Would've been 2 if Nadal didnt bust his knee at the Wimbledon 07 final.

    Here is another statistic:

    The Little Known Secret That Rafael Nadal Used to Win The 2009 Australian Open


    [​IMG]

    You’ve heard the news: Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer in an epic five-set battle to win the 2009 Australian Open. It was the longest match in the tournament’s history, lasting over 4 hours. And it was Nadal’s first victory on a hard court surface.

    But what you did NOT know, is this: Nadal “baited” Federer into the five-set battle. He knew he stood a better chance of winning.
    Nadal’s Secret Tactic — Know Your Competitors Inside Out

    Nadal knew one thing that we did not know.

    Going into this tournament final, Nadal knew that Federer had a terrible track record when it came down to stretching the match to five-sets. Federer had only won 13 out of 24 previous five-set matches, and lost 11. Nadal on the other hand, had won 11 out of 14 five-set matches — a staggering 78% winning record!

    That stat alone made all the difference.

    If you look back at how Nadal played his fourth set you will notice how he “gave in” after realizing that the set was a lost cause. He had already lost break points, and he knew it would be better to conserve energy to take Federer into the fifth set. And that’s what he did. He knew he stood a better chance of beating Federer in the fifth set. When it came down to the fifth set, he went all out for his break point, and he got it. He forced Federer to make more errors, and cruised to the end.
     
    #8

Share This Page