in case steroid use...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by aphex, Jun 19, 2009.

  1. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    ...is proven for a tennis player...what happens then?

    say one of two players who was in the final of an event wins but is later proved to have used
    steroids, is the trophy automatically handed to his opponent?

    what happens in other sports?
     
    #1
  2. THESEXPISTOL

    THESEXPISTOL Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Europe
    Yeah, the steroid user is desqualified and the title & trophy goes to the 2nd.
    That is very usual in cycling and athletism.
    But it can very fustrating for the 2nd because the glory went all to the cheater in the ceremonies..
     
    #2
  3. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    yeah but cycling is different cause it's not a tournament...in tennis, the user
    beat someone in the semis, quarters etc...
     
    #3
  4. THESEXPISTOL

    THESEXPISTOL Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Europe
    I guess that if is discovered before the next match the loser will take his place. If he already played against others and won, the last one that he won will play next round as Lucky Loser. This presuming that the steroid user has been discovered during the tournament.
    If he's only discovered in the end everything remains the same but everyone walks up one position in the final rank of the tour. If he won it then the 2nd will be 1st.
     
    #4
  5. dh003i

    dh003i Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,114
    If it's proven, it really ought to result in life-long ban from the sport.

    It isn't as simple as simply giving the trophy to the other person in the final. What about all of the guys the cheater beat? You'd have an entirely different draw, as all of those results are invalid. Heck, someone didn't get to play because that guy cheated; so the money he earned from the tournaments where he cheated shouldn't be his to keep either.

    Lets say that player Y plays Z in he finals. Y is later found out to have used steroids and other immediate performance enhancers for his SF against player X. So now, we have a case where player X should ave been the one in the finals. But the trophy is given to player Z. Player X has just cause for complaint as well.

    Tennis isn't like cycling, where it's easy to say who would've won had not one guy cheated.

    The fact is, it should have been a player X vs. Z final.
     
    #5

Share This Page