Indian Wells: Federer v Blake (spoiler)

Discussion in 'Pro Match Results and Discussion' started by Galactus, Mar 19, 2006.

  1. Calboymatt

    Calboymatt New User

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    kiwi wumpus subliminal messaging start ((((((hi)))
    NEXT TIME BLAKE WILL CONQUER!!!!! YEAH RIGHT...
     
  2. ragnaROK

    ragnaROK Professional

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    919
    Great run for Blake. I think he's proven enough this tourney especially to all the naysayers that said he didnt have enough to make the top 10.
     
  3. Maco_Andrej

    Maco_Andrej Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    149
    go roger.........:eek: :eek: :eek:
     
  4. chess9

    chess9 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    4,274
    Location:
    1.d4
    8PAQ:

    Well, on personality alone, AROD should be in the minors. :)

    Something else about Blake's play in the first set-it was very smart. He moved Roger all over the place and had a lot of variety in his game. He also retrieved well, i.e. he MOVED beautifully. By the third set, Blake was going through the motions. He barely ran for quite a few shots. Was that lack of motivation? Was he tired? Was it the lack of enough recent tennis in the rare altitude of center court finals? Peter Fleming says Blake lacks confidence. Well, I have no doubt the prospect of playing Federer is daunting for everyone on tour, but these guys all have egos the size of Kansas, so I don't think the psychological component is that huge. IMHO, Blake got owned because he couldn't sustain the high level of physical intensity required at the top for two days straight. Just my humble opinion of course. The good news is that more of the same is the prescription for winning the final. Blake has the talent and he would be so good for American tennis because he isn't a snotty, spoiled kid.

    -Robert
    ________
    XR125L
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2011
  5. agassirulz8991

    agassirulz8991 New User

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    35
    Federer has the ability when needed, to elevate his game a notch or two and more importantly, sustain it to the finish. Blake had Federer reeling on the ropes in the first set but could not keep up when Federer decided to turn up his game.
    I was actually rooting for Blake to win although I'm also a huge Fed fan but Fed was just too good, as always.
     
  6. Tchocky

    Tchocky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,816
    Location:
    The OC
    Did anyone notice that Black (Blake) was wearing white shorts yesterday? He's been wearing dark blue shorts all week and then he switches to white shorts for the final. That should have been an omen. I hope nobody got hurt betting on Black (Blake).
     
  7. austro

    austro Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    893
    Stupid post! Save the bandwidth.
     

Share This Page