Is 5ft 9 tall enough for tennis?

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by Wolfdale, Dec 1, 2012.

  1. Wolfdale

    Wolfdale New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    25
    I know that height shouldn't be a limiting factor for a amateur player like me, but I'd like to know how much height affects tennis playing after all. Would I have a huge increase in performance if I were 6 ft 2, for instance?

    I'm a 3.0~3.5 player, still developing much of the game aspects. I also know that it's hard to answer that, but in case of a 5.0 player who is 5ft 9, is he able to serve well despite his height?

    How does Ferrer, for instance, being on the short side, compare to taller players close to his ranking?

    Thank you very much for the answers!
     
    #1
  2. Headshotterer

    Headshotterer Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    903
    Ferrer is top ranked because he works very hard and competes his best. In lower levels, this is not as common so any physical advantage is big.
     
    #2
  3. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787
    Comparing pros to 3.5 rec players isn't going to give you any real answers. It's apples and oranges.
     
    #3
  4. Wolfdale

    Wolfdale New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    25
    I'm very sorry, I posted it on the wrong area, could it be moved to Tennis Tips/Instructions? I meant to post there!
     
    #4
  5. db10s

    db10s Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,973
    Location:
    S. FL/Maine
    My coach is 5ft 10, he won in futures... As a big server..... He just has REALLY good technique, his forehand and serve were ATP good, but his backhand held him back.
     
    #5
  6. TheCheese

    TheCheese Professional

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    954
    Until you get to a pretty high level I don't think height is really going to limit you that much.
     
    #6
  7. goran_ace

    goran_ace Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,862
    Location:
    At Large
    Heeght/reach irrelevant. Coverage is determined by quickness and footwork.
     
    #7
  8. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,128
    Olivier Rochus at 5' 5" got to #24 in the world.
    Don't worry about it.


    Benjamin Becker is 5' 10" and was one of the hardest servers in the world.
    If you are 5' 9", maybe you might top out at 134 mph first serve speed (if your form is good enough).

    Lots of advantages to being shorter and quicker in tennis offsetting advantages that taller players have in certain areas.
     
    #8
  9. boramiNYC

    boramiNYC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,361
    agreed. advantages and disadvantages for both short and tall. maximize your advantage and attack opponents disadvantage. winner is the one who does this better.
     
    #9
  10. SystemicAnomaly

    SystemicAnomaly G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    11,059
    Location:
    Stuck in the Matrix somewhere in Santa Clara CA
    Marcelo Rios (former ATP #1) and Michael Chang (former ATP #2) were both 5'9".

    .
     
    #10
  11. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    At the rec level, height is the last thing anyone needs to worry about.
     
    #11
  12. Kenzik

    Kenzik New User

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2012
    Messages:
    54
    Yea don't even worry about it.
     
    #12
  13. OHBH

    OHBH Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    Messages:
    590
    At the amateur level height is very helpful for taking care of moonballs and moonballers, but that is about it.
     
    #13
  14. y11971alex

    y11971alex New User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Absolutely.

    K. R. Rosewall, at the very top '50s to '70s, was 5' 7"

    R. Laver, 2 calendar year slams, was 5' 9"
     
    #14
  15. corbind

    corbind Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,308
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Reality is it is something you're born with and cannot change. So if you are 5', 5'9", or whatever -- embrace it. I feel height has an impact on serve. As a general rule, the taller the player, the harder it is to return his serve.

    I greatly dislike returning serve from a guy around my height (6'2") or taller. The angle of the served ball coming down from the sky is greater and often with pace. Against average-height servers returning is easier.

    Still, a short guy with a good kick serve will damage me more than a tall dude hitting flat as Incan just block those back. Kick serve gives you great clearance over the net no matter your height.

    Half the guys on our college team were at least six foot and the most successful ones (except one) were in that group.

    Finally, being tall has advantages everywhere on the court. But the MAIN thing is talent and application. Tall guy who is lazy versus short guy who works hard -- who wins? Guy who is naturally talented but lazy versus guy who practices his tail off -- who wins?
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2012
    #15
  16. dominikk1985

    dominikk1985 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,414
    yes. It is hard to get in the top10 at this height but even the top100 are very possible if you have good technique, talent and fitness.

    at 3.5-5.5 it really shouldn't make a big difference. also don't limit yourself to pushing. footwork is even more important at your height but guys like rochus are offensive players albeit no real power hitter. even ferrer got a lot more offensive in the last years (taking the ball early and make the opponent run) and grosjean had a hge FH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qejr9i0oKd8
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2012
    #16
  17. tennis_balla

    tennis_balla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,667
    Location:
    Here and There
    No, 5ft. 9 is too short for tennis. Your opponent will have trouble seeing you on the other side of the court. You should not play tennis at all, so sell your rackets.
     
    #17
  18. SStrikerR

    SStrikerR Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,046
    Location:
    Not Fantasy Land
    Yes, if you get taller your technique will improve and you will automatically serve 30mph harder. You can't play tennis.
     
    #18
  19. Coach Chad

    Coach Chad Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2012
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Height is something that you cannot do anything about...down through the years, tennis champions have come both tall and short...do not concern yourself with it.
     
    #19
  20. dominikk1985

    dominikk1985 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,414
    Yes but you forgot to mention that a modern 3.5 is too much for those old guys:D. that was stone age:)
     
    #20
  21. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    You're too short for modern tennis.
    Connors was 5'10", Agassi another inch, McEnroe another still.
    Look thru the top 40 ATP pros. Only 15 or so are shorter than 6'. You have no chance whatsoever.
     
    #21
  22. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,092
    lol, only 15 or so, indeed.

    but yeh, I always forget Rios, he was only 5' 9", wasn't he? ATP number 1..

    as for Ferrer, I've met him a couple of times (lovely guy) and there is no way he's 5'9". I'm 5'9" (barely!), and I'm definitely taller than Daveeed!

    so, OP, bit of a silly question, ye?
     
    #22
  23. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Yeah, Chang was never any good, neither were EddyDibbs or HaroldSolomon, OlivierRochus or AlbertoBarrasetchi. They just goofed around on the courts, cannon fodder for the other players.
    It's 6'5" or doomed to 3.5 level tennis.
     
    #23
  24. y11971alex

    y11971alex New User

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    so, according to your purport, a modern 3.5 should win 2 calendar year slams?:)
     
    #24
  25. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    It sure wouldn't hurt to be 6' to 6'3" to start with.
    Some eyesight, some quickness, some determination, and a whole lotta physical skills too....
     
    #25
  26. Wolfdale

    Wolfdale New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    25
    Just out of curiosity, how tall are you guys? I wrote this topic because I thought 5ft9 was a below average height for a sport like tennis, but I don't think it's below average in all other regards!
     
    #26
  27. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    5'9" is too short for any position on the pro football field..except for field goal kicker.... CB's that height can't cover 6'4" wideouts...
    5'9" is too short for current thought in basketball, because even though you can score 25 points a game, you defense cannot cover to that extent.
    I got u by 2".
     
    #27
  28. VeeSe

    VeeSe Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    211
    I'm 5'7 or 5'8. No problems on the court here.
     
    #28
  29. SystemicAnomaly

    SystemicAnomaly G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    11,059
    Location:
    Stuck in the Matrix somewhere in Santa Clara CA
    Just a scosh over 5'10". Even at 60 years of age, my serve is still a weapon against 20-somethings.
     
    #29
  30. TheCheese

    TheCheese Professional

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    954
    Yes, but you're not trying to become a professional. And even then, it's probably one of the better sports to have a height disadvantage because so much of it is technical skill rather than innate physical qualities.
     
    #30
  31. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,362
    I saw Cibulkova (5 feet 3") playing at Stanford last year. She was awesome.

    [​IMG]
     
    #31
  32. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    Tell that to the Patriots.

    6'2". I'm usually taller than most in rec tennis.
     
    #32
  33. junbumkim

    junbumkim Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,111
    In short, no 5ft 9in is not tall enough to use your physicality to your advantage. But, you are not short for tennis, either.

    In professional level, physicality becomes more important, and it can put you at disadvantage. In amateur or recreational level, not so much. Bottomline - it shouldn't deter you from playing and enjoying tennis game.

    Think about this, would you stop playing basketball just because you are 5ft 9in? You probably won't play center, but you can still enjoy the game.
     
    #33
  34. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Sumo, I don't understand your post.
    I'm just north of BerkeleyCa. mainly watch the 49'ers.
    What exactly are you saying in regards to Brady's team, whom we play in a couple of weeks.? Isn't Gronk like 6'8"? Our best reciever might be DelanieWalker, about 6'3", but easy 265 lbs. He actually makes an effort to catch the ball, unlike Davis or Moss who barely bother to raise one arm, unless the ball hits their numbers with a thump.
    9'ers have'nt played their two top draft picks this year, AJJenkins and that standout OregonU runner, LaMichaelJames. We're weak in running backs, as Gore is injured, Hunter is out for the year, and Jacobs doesn't like to mix it up with the big boyz.
     
    #34
  35. goran_ace

    goran_ace Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,862
    Location:
    At Large
    Think he's referring to Patriots guys like Wes Welker and Danny Woodhead
     
    #35
  36. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    How did you get from my reference to the Pats to talking about the 49rs draft picks? What goes on in that head of yours?

    What I'm saying is that some of the best players in the league are short and was using the Pats as an example because they have a number of high profile guys that size. It should also be pointed out that a couple of guys you mentioned are also 5'9".
     
    #36
  37. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,092
    I thought it was an oblique reference to the fact that it's just as well the Pats have such a great offence 'cos they can't defend anything under 25!
     
    #37
  38. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    Well played.
     
    #38
  39. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    Always thought of Welker as a possession reciever with some speed. His hands are what the Patriots are paying for. Not his height.
    Gronk has the height, and is a favorite in the red zone, not Welker.
    Big target, tiny defender's, makes a good matchup.
    You a Pats fan? Don't want to know any insider secrets? OK. And yes, both AJ and LaMichael are 5'9" tall, but neither are CB's.
    Runners, BarrySander's was 5'8". He did OK. LaDainianT also.
     
    #39
  40. Sumo

    Sumo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Chapel Hill
    What are you talking about?

    You said 5'9" is too short. It's not.
    Who cares about Gronk's matchup advantages.
     
    #40
  41. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,092
    thank you sir..

    (I'm a Pats fan, btw, but sheesh, sometimes..)
     
    #41
  42. Larrysümmers

    Larrysümmers Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,995
    Location:
    1313 Mockingbird Lane.
    nah, too short. take up rose gardening
     
    #42
  43. Hi I'm Ray

    Hi I'm Ray Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,504
    As others have already pointed out, there are top pros and other very good tennis players that are around that height. Taller players may have an easier time generating power but generally seem to be less coordinated, Shorter players seem to be faster and more coordinated but have to work more at generating power - just different advantages/disadvantage and things for each to work on. I played college with an "official" height of 5'11 but actually I'm not sure why that happens to me so often because I'm really 5'9. I've met good players of all different heights. The number 1 player at one school looked to be around 5'6 and there was one impossibly fast player that was around 5'4. A friend who is around 5'9-5'10 made it onto a college team with his major advantage being that he hits very powerful and super low trajectory forhands that gave the taller players a lot of trouble, and I usually had the advantage against him so height isn't everything. Don't worry about it, just get lots of practice and enjoy the game.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2012
    #43
  44. Fuji

    Fuji Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,591
    I'm slightly above national average at 6'0 tall. I'm shorter most of the guys I end up playing. Guys at my club are tall!

    That being said, my coach is 6'2 and he did quite well at the futures/challengers level. He's also the most gifted player I've ever watched play. :p

    Height really doesn't matter though. I prefer playing against tree tall guys though, it's much easier to slice and keep them low.

    -Fuji
     
    #44
  45. bhupaes

    bhupaes Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    957
    I'm relatively short - 5'10", 155 lbs - and I sometimes play against a 6'6" guy, who's a lefty. His serve is a monstrous, high speed lefty slice that I sometimes can't even reach on my backhand, but I get him on the ground game most of the time. Our matches are pretty even, despite the height difference. Just be prepared to hold your serve, anticipate and run, and good things will happen! This is at USTA 4.5, but IMO, 5'9" is fine for high level tennis too, going by the achievements of a certain David Ferrer!
     
    #45
  46. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    We know the strengths and weaknesses of being tall or short. Can we exploit it to our advantage?
    OlivierRochus was 5'5", and played in the solid 7.0 levels, as did several other guys height challenged.
    Lots of players taller than 6'6" never made it to the top 50 in the pros, and had the training and opportunity.
     
    #46
  47. 3fees

    3fees Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,034
    Location:
    NorCal
    Is 5' 9" tall enough for tennis, Yes.

    Speaking of pro's -you missed it,,Rod Laver is 5' 8" tall

    :mrgreen:
     
    #47
  48. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    36,399
    Location:
    East side of San Francisco Bay
    I didn't miss it. Rosewall was shorter. Chang was 5'7". Connors a true 5'10". JohanKriek was only 5'8.5". HaroldSolomon was 5'7.
     
    #48
  49. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,367
    At the recreational/USTA level, I'd say it's more about your ability to play than height.

    Sure, you man not be an ace machine, but if you move well, are consistent and play to your strengths, then height won't be much of a factor.

    One of the toughest guys I've played over the years is much shorter than I am (I'm 5'11" - not exactly tall myself), but he's tough to beat. Gets to everything and hits well from both sides. Extremely quick and doesn't miss.

    On the flip side, I played one guy who was 6'7" - he hit a lot of aces, but I usually beat him in singles because once I manged to get the ball in play I had the advantage in movement.
     
    #49

Share This Page