Is Murray the most aesthetic grinder in history?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by monfed, Feb 29, 2012.

  1. monfed

    monfed Guest

    Traditionally, grinders aren't the most aesthetically pleasing players to watch imo unless I missed someone in the 60s, apologies if I did.

    However, Murray seems to diverge from that trend.
    He's got a lovely service motion(one of the best looking on tour right now imo). Stylish pusher FH(which he can flatten out if the need arises), stable yet somewhat aesthetic BH. Decent volleys,looks good at the net when he occasionally comes in.

    So, most stylish grinder ever?
     
    #1
  2. pc1

    pc1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    9,338
    What's your definition of a grinder? You can call Borg, Orantes, Rosewall, Agassi (late in his career especially), Vilas, Wilander and Lendl grinders but perhaps not. You can call a lot of the players of today like Nadal and Djokovic grinders also. Are these players grinders in your opinion? Federer may be a grinder at times also.
     
    #2
  3. Rozroz

    Rozroz Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,201
    Aesthetic??
    Murray??
    Huh??
     
    #3
  4. nereis

    nereis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    545
    If by grinding you mean getting balls back in play deep and putting pressure on the opponent to not make the error first then no, plenty of other players have played his game in a more pleasing manner.

    A sample list in no particular order of players I think are more enjoyable to watch if they're just grinding out points.

    Borg
    Vilas
    Wilander
    Ferrer
    Agassi
    Coria

    Reasoning being: floating balls up the centre and grimacing/swearing after losing a point isn't a mainstay.

    Murray is far more fun to watch when he's being aggressive.
     
    #4
  5. monfed

    monfed Guest

    Isn't it reasonable to consider that Murray at his core is a grinder? He's not known for his shotmaking ability atleast he doesn't do it consistently enough for me to consider him one.
    At times several players(even Pete) have grind-ed out matches but at their core they're not.
    Borg is considered by most to be athletic than aesthetic.
     
    #5
  6. vive le beau jeu !

    vive le beau jeu ! G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,308
    Location:
    Ometepe, Pink Granite, Queyras, Kerguelen Islands,
    aesthetic...... you mean... himself, or his game ?
    'cause i surely wouldn't put him above my fireplace, even after a visit at the taxidermist.
     
    #6
  7. monfed

    monfed Guest

    This is precisely what I mean and I should've put it in my OP, my mistake.


    How is Ferrer/Coria more aesthetic than Murray? :shock:

    Also Agassi is an allcourter, he takes the ball very early so I fail to understand how he could be considered a grinder.

    Look guys, let's not take one/two matches to determine if they're grinders or not. Let's look at their core playing style please.

    Examples of grinders would be - Hewitt,Nadal, Murray,Ferrer, Simon. That should get you started.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 29, 2012
    #7
  8. monfed

    monfed Guest

    His game(sorry If I didn't bring that out clearly in my OP).

    LOL! The muzzette could certainly do with a shave(although I'm not sure if that'd do it for you. ;) )


    A thread on aesthetics without your opinion is incomplete,vive. Glad you took a peek! ;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 29, 2012
    #8
  9. Homeboy Hotel

    Homeboy Hotel Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    London
    I think he has a pretty attractive ('interesting') game to watch. The guy is on the positive end of the variety spectrum and has many options on all his shots. I like watching him and like his tactical mindset about how he approaches matches.

    He likes to predict what a players gonna do, get into the opponents head by forcing them to make mistakes and just use his calibre to open up the court.

    His volleying is pretty underrated, and just generally everything is pretty good to justify his ranking (if not 1-2 places higher in the next few months).
     
    #9
  10. Say Chi Sin Lo

    Say Chi Sin Lo Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,087
    The only thing that qualifies Agassi as a "grinder" is the fact that he played at the baseline. Other than that, he's not a grinder. Also, when you play a grinder, it doesn't turn into a punishing track meet.

    Ferrer and Coria's game are/were effective, but there's nothing pretty about their strokes.
     
    #10
  11. Funbun

    Funbun Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    901
    Don't forget that Murray also has taken the ball earlier to be a bit more aggressive and even with Djokovic. However, I do agree he is a sort of "grinder".

    Murray is a different sort, in the sense that he doesn't really rely on high, loopy, spinny rally shots to set up. He just hits around with almost the same pace every time, making an opponent move until they break. That, or Murray runs around himself.

    I read on Youtube that Murray is practically the Tim Duncan of tennis, and it's true. His strokes look so ridiculously normal, clean efficient, that it's boring. His style of play looks so stable that it doesn't look like high level tennis.

    Yet, Murray remains my favorite player simply because amongst all the other players on the tour, he tries to stay stable, going mildly aggressive or rather defensive. He's not fancy or rough or majestic or pure. He's the epitome of normal, so much that he's fun to watch, especially when he faces the more aggressive players.
     
    #11
  12. laughingbuddha

    laughingbuddha Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    174
    The only aesthetically pleasing players in the top 10 are Federer, and occasionally Tsonga.
     
    #12
  13. TheOneHander

    TheOneHander Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,152
    I've seen it all now.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
    #13
  14. dominikk1985

    dominikk1985 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,362
    borg is easily the most aesthetic grinder in history.
     
    #14
  15. mucat

    mucat Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,072
    Location:
    king size donut bed
    You mean anesthetic?




    Well, he is not that bad. ;)
     
    #15
  16. bc-05

    bc-05 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    648
    i dislike his forehand. period!
     
    #16
  17. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,325
    Unfortunately the only thing that matters with serves is consistent effectiveness and Murray's lets him down all the time when he's not playing bunnies.
     
    #17
  18. celoft

    celoft Guest

    Murray makes pushing look elegant and stylish.
     
    #18
  19. Nathaniel_Near

    Nathaniel_Near G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    18,978
    Location:
    Relax folks, ...
    Borg, probably.

    Roger isn't a grinder as his play is never really monotonous. Even when he is playing it safer and isn't attacking a whole lot, it's still never grinder tennis.
     
    #19
  20. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    That's because he doesn't push, and usually hits more winners than his opponent.
     
    #20
  21. vive le beau jeu !

    vive le beau jeu ! G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,308
    Location:
    Ometepe, Pink Granite, Queyras, Kerguelen Islands,
    it's always a pleasure to modestly contribute to quality threads. ;)

    (a shaved muzzette ?... ummm i'm not sure if it would really be better......)
     
    #21
  22. ace_pace

    ace_pace Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    329
    If you think Murray is aesthetically pleasing, what do you think of the Nadal/Fed?
     
    #22
  23. celoft

    celoft Guest

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pusher_(tennis)

    I like him.

    Hope he can win a slam this year and stop Djokodal's reign of terror.
     
    #23
  24. monfed

    monfed Guest

    Basically this. Well said. :)
     
    #24
  25. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    28,864
    Location:
    Brave New World
    I believe this thread was created to bait Blnkism.

    btw, how come batz has not commented.
    Well put, we need someone to put an end to that scourge, so Nadal can reclaim his throne. Oh wait, i thought you said Djokovic.
     
    #25
  26. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    28,864
    Location:
    Brave New World
    Nadal - artistic, athletic
    Federer - pathetic, finished
     
    #26
  27. Rozroz

    Rozroz Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,201
    [​IMG]
     
    #27
  28. MixieP

    MixieP Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,225
    Location:
    Milano, Italia
    A nice read, thank you. And I agree with your assessment.
     
    #28
  29. nereis

    nereis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    545
    Ferrer has a nice curve to his shots, trades groundstrokes in a metronomic fashion and smokes balls with regularity.

    Coria had an amazing ability to move and stay on balance in addition to being very balanced off both wings and had great feel to mask and execute drop shots.
     
    #29
  30. Nathaniel_Near

    Nathaniel_Near G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    18,978
    Location:
    Relax folks, ...
    Nadal is glorious, gladiatorial and flawless, Federer is vulnerable, mercurial and flaky.
     
    #30
  31. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    28,864
    Location:
    Brave New World
    You forgot a few there in your otherwise perfect post.
     
    #31
  32. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,999
    OP I'm not going to give you a hard time like everyone else, you're clearly onto something...

    However 2 things, first Murray's game "looks" and IS better when he's aggressive, which is becoming more often the case thankfully.

    Secondly, there's got to be other pretty grinders because look no further than Gilles Simon. Gilles' backhand is so simple it's breathtaking, and when he's aggressive on his forehand out of nowhere it's a thing of beauty.
     
    #32

Share This Page