Is Raonic out of his mind or he just expect too much from himself?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Paullaconte1, Oct 5, 2012.

  1. Paullaconte1

    Paullaconte1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    Raonic had another funny interview when he said he didn't really serve well with Tipsarevic.

    He did 24 aces in 16 games, won 87% of the points on his serve and Tipsarevic has never been close to break him (no break points for Tipsi).

    Here Raonic funny interview.
    http://www.tennistonic.com/view_ten...y-and-Raonic-to-clash-in-the-2012-Tokyo-semis

    I have 4 theories:
    1- He is out of his mind;
    2- He can't read a game;
    3- He expect too much from his serve and his tennis;
    4- He is right and he should serve at least 3 aces per game (!!!!:confused::confused::confused:????)

    I am mixed up about this.
     
    #1
  2. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,600

    You sure mate? Didn't they play 34 games?
     
    #2
  3. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    16 service games and 2 tiebreaks of serving, so I guess it depends how you define it. Either way 24 aces is great in only a 3 set match. Raonic indeed is a bit crazy if he said he served bad.
     
    #3
  4. Hawkeye7

    Hawkeye7 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,003
    Location:
    Cologne
    I was wondering the same thing.
     
    #4
  5. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,600
    Fair point - he was only serving for 16 games. Doh!:oops: What a muppet I am! Agree 100% - I saw the last 2 sets of his match and he looked like he was serving fine to me.
     
    #5
  6. 6-1 6-3 6-0

    6-1 6-3 6-0 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,657
    I think Raonic is just accepting that he'll have a career just like Karlovic's, with occasional wins over top players but never cracking the top 10.
     
    #6
  7. wy2sl0

    wy2sl0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,573
    When he beat Murray on clay this year it was from his ground game mostly.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GfkZjcwJ8k

    About 10 times better. Period.

    Karlovic can't even hit a backhand. Get lost troll.
     
    #7
  8. Russeljones

    Russeljones G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    13,045
    How many points played on own serve and TB? Judging aces/game is pointless.
     
    #8
  9. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    Raonic likes to talk, he is just a talker. A horrible slam player, a poor mover, an inconsistent ground game, very limited potential. A poor man's Berdych/Tsonga.
     
    #9
  10. TheCanadian

    TheCanadian Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    487
    Only on this forum can a player who's still in his early 20's and about to crack the top 10 be described as possessing "limited potential" by teenagers who can't even win a club championship.
     
    #10
  11. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    The only reason why Raonic is ranked high early in his career is because his serve was a top class level from day one. He hasn't shown potential in any other aspect. Very average player outside of the serve. Where's the potential?
     
    #11
  12. Devilito

    Devilito Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,266
    Best serve on tour, one of the best forehands that constantly improving, a very solid net game, a solid mental game, and a backhand and return game that's obviously improving from earlier in the year. His entire career is 1/2 year last year and this is his first full year played on tour and it's not even over yet. So at the end of the year you'll be looking at a top 10 player that's played an entire 18 months on tour. It’s very obvious you have limited understanding of the sport. I mean, how many slams should a player with 18 months on tour have won so far?
     
    #12
  13. nethawkwenatchee

    nethawkwenatchee Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    868
    Location:
    Wenatchee, WA
    This guy has a great serve and everyone knows it. The truth is: he's trying to play the classic "I can win when I'm not playing my best" routine... a phsyc game to put mental pressure on future opponents. A guy like this wants as much media coverage about how good he is. The more positive reinforcment, the more "factor" he becomes in the mind of future opponents. This won't matter much with his next opponent (Andy), who has already figured out that all he has to do is exploit Milos reletive weak movement, serve and return well (which he's been doing consistnatly as of late)
     
    #13
  14. PeteD

    PeteD Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,534
    Location:
    The Commonwealth (of PA)
    Milos beat Tipsy (who was rude as ever), but barely. He almost lost the final TB and only clutch serving saved him. He should have won the 1st set TB -- maybe that was the serving he was complaining about.
     
    #14
  15. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    You said he had a solid mental game :lol: yet he chokes repeatedly in 3rd sets. You said he has ONE OF THE BEST FOREHANDS :lol: compared to whom? Does one of the best mean top 50? or top 5? Sure, a solid net game. That's the only thing I agree with. Oh, and "best serve on tour" is a very dicey thing to say. There are many with great serves. He's not doing to well at the slams for someone with the best serve on tour :lol:
     
    #15
  16. norbac

    norbac Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,596
    I don't think his FH is even top 10. Seen him net a lot of rally balls on that side that don't even make it halfway over the net.
     
    #16
  17. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Indeed, we cannot have a legitimate discussion about best serve on the tour (or best anything on the tour for that matter) without including Rafa as a candidate.

    Rafa must also be included as a candidate in any legitimate discussion about best underwear adverts. Rafa's left handed modeling poses cannot be defeated as they cross over to Beckham's weaker right hand poses.
     
    #17
  18. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    You brought up Nadal. Not me. Your obsession is obvious, and it extends beyond tennis, oddly.
     
    #18
  19. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Obvious obsession is obvious. Rafa FTW.
     
    #19
  20. ruerooo

    ruerooo Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,578
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Sounds like he has high standards for himself. Most potential champions do.

    (Are you guys going to stop arguing about Rafa in a thread that's not even about him? :shock: Have some cocoa. Have a drink.)
     
    #20
  21. RogerRacket111

    RogerRacket111 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    708
    He is serving quite good. But I would say relying too much on the serve will catch up to you when you have an off day. Look at Isner or even Andy in the past. It will only get you so far. The returners have gotten a lot better.
     
    #21
  22. JLyon

    JLyon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,378
    Location:
    AR
    He lost the first TB because he missed 5 straight BH's badly. Now if he can shore up the backhand and make it a pro level shot then he can go far. He is young and improving for sure.
     
    #22
  23. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    :lol:

    Raonic isn't a "potential champion". This is just him being full of crap. He also claimed that he isn't far from Federer, the way he's moving. :lol:
     
    #23
  24. Rozroz

    Rozroz Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,237
    ??? did he actually say that? how arrogant! :twisted:
     
    #24
  25. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,686

    He is light years away from Fed,and if he thinks otherwise he's only fooling himself.
     
    #25
  26. TheFifthSet

    TheFifthSet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,424
    Where lol?
     
    #26
  27. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    http://www.tennis.com/players/2012/...houghts-from-milos-raonic/37204/#.UG9ZaFH8kyg

     
    #27
  28. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Context, context, context. His comment was specifically in relation to his H2H matches with Federer, not his overall record, and the H2H scorelines were indeed very competitive i.e. "not far off".

    Still, how the big points are played is a large part of what separates a champion from a pretender. Milos is still in the pretender category as far as challenging for a major now.
     
    #28
  29. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    Oh shut up will you. :) There is no context. Going by that logic, Falla isn't that far off from Federer either. :lol:

    Also, what makes that comment doubly ridiculous is the fact that he said "the way I'm MOVING now, I'm not that far of from Federer"

    There is no way that he will ever move as well as Federer even in his current state.
     
    #29
  30. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    yeah, that's how I read it too. Raonic and Federer shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence anywhere about anything. He is just being a fool comparing himself to Fed, especially in 'the movement' category.
     
    #30
  31. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    Serve?

    But then again, Federer doesn't deserve to be mentioned with him either. :lol:
     
    #31
  32. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    No.

    There have been some times at Wimby when Federer probably wished Falla was a lot farther off. :)

    Raonic quote context translator, custom dangalak version ON;

    "the way I'm moving now, it's not so much of a hindrance to my overall game so that in the match scorelines I'm not that far of from Federer"

    Raonic quote context translator, custom dangalak version OFF;
     
    #32
  33. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,686
    #33
  34. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    no, I'm not giving you 'serve' either. Fed's placement is superior.
    lol at the second part of your post, good one :lol:
     
    #34
  35. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Giraffe boy doesn't need to move. Wingspan covers entire court just standing in the middle. Coach Blanco is an idiot for not realizing this.
     
    #35
  36. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    this is brilliant, love it :lol::lol::lol:
     
    #36
  37. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    [​IMG]

    Good God in heaven.
     
    #37
  38. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    [​IMG]

    This super useful gif is totally saving my ass today.
     
    #38
  39. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    http://www.atpworldtour.com/Rankings/MatchFacts.aspx

    Service games won:

    Raonic: 93%
    Federer: 91%

    1st serve points won:

    Raonic: 83%
    Federer: 78%

    Aces:

    Raonic: 858
    Federer: 559

    Keep in mind that Federer has played 14 matches more.

    Aces per match:

    Raonic: 15,6
    Federer: 8,1

    Raonic hits almost TWICE as many aces per match.


    Now keep in mind that he is THIS superior, while having only a fraction of Federer's rallying ability. If the rest of his game was as good as Federer's, his serve would be even more superior.
     
    #39
  40. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    But the placement...what about the frickin placement? Where's your stat for that? Huh?

     
    #40
  41. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    alright, I lose, you 2 win - Raonic is a better server (this year). still not sure about prime Fed, it might be just my impression tho. I assume those stats are 2012 right?

    Gut, like really, how do I give you stats for placement? you serious? if you give me stats for court coverage I'll give you stats for placement :). My point about placement is that your serve can be very effective without being a bomb every time.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2012
    #41
  42. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    What the hell? Have today's poasts taught you nothing? All you need to know about court coverage is right here;

    [​IMG]
     
    #42
  43. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    There are several guy who are better servers than Federer.

    They are much worse PLAYERS than Federer though, which is why Federer can hold about as often.

    Not to mention that Raonic places his serve just as well as Federer, only he serves it about 20 mph harder.
     
    #43
  44. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    I was j/k, there is a smiley at the end of my sentence you quoted. I also admitted I was wrong and too casual in my original post when I said to Dang I wasn't giving him 'serve'.

    cute pic about court coverage btw :)
     
    #44
  45. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    as I mentioned already, dang, I was just casual and kinda pissed with Milos claiming that he is 'close to Fed' ... I wasn't even thinking about their respective serves, percentages etc ... you guys took it seriously and you are right, no problem there.
     
    #45
  46. Gut Check

    Gut Check Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Well crap, if you want to actually talk seriously for a second, the overall service stats quoted above don't take into account the "quality" factor. I'm not going to take the time to verify with a hard analysis, but I'm fairly certain we'd find that the average ranking of the players Fed has played are a noticeable notch up the scale from Raonic's opponents. That's a factor of both Fed playing higher quality tournaments on average, and also going deeper in the draw on average. Those higher quality players make it more difficult for Fed to pad his stats on service effectiveness, and even ace counts (I'll hypothesize that better players on average read incoming serves better and get aced less).

    I don't think any of the big 4 are afraid of Raonic's service game. They know that to be the best they have to absorb the best of what the field has to throw at them. That being said, you can't tell me that anyone is really happy going in there against the Raonic service game. Even with limited (but improving) tools to back up his delivery, he's already better than Karlovic ever was, and I remember all the talk from the top players about how awkward it was to play Karlovic before he started slipping in recent years.

    The number of matches when opponents have really started to get a hold on Raonic's service have been very few and far between. Muzza got on top of it at USO and all credit to him, but the majority of Raonic service games for the foreseeable future are going to be mostly on his racket in terms of the outcome.
     
    #46
  47. Rozroz

    Rozroz Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,237
    good one! i'll drink to that ;)
     
    #47
  48. dangalak

    dangalak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Messages:
    608
    Regardless of the "opposition", Raonic's serve is still vastly superior to Federer's
     
    #48
  49. Big_Dangerous

    Big_Dangerous Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    6,173
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I think that might be the first post 6-1 has made that didn't have one single mention of Nadal in it... Wow, I am blown away.

    :)
     
    #49
  50. forzamilan90

    forzamilan90 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,565
    I think Raonic's legit. Serve is the best on tour imo, but he's got power game on the baseline too. The matches he played against Federer he impressed me, displayed lots of power and good ground game and movement wasn't as bad as I was expecting it to be. He'll be a top 10 player for sure.
     
    #50

Share This Page