is roddick the best GRASSCOURT player ever to not win wimbledon

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by manny pacquiao P4P king, May 19, 2009.

  1. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    he's won 4 queens club titles, and has beaten wimbledon champions such as agassi and hewitt. has beaten quite a few wimbledon semi finalists like grosjean and ancic.

    At the moment - only federer and nadal have a better record than roddick in the last few years (i rate roddick ahead of hewitt on grass - hewitt never had play fed in a wimby final). i consider federer and nadal the best players ever. aside from nadal who has actually beaten fed on the grass - roddick is the only man to have pushed federer far at wimbledon, and who knows, if the rain didn't come then roddick might have won.

    i think roddick would have won at least 1 wimbledon in the 90's or 90's grass. im not questioning nadal or hewits win at wimbledon (bcuz it was deserved) but roddick would have also been at a bigger advantage to win wimbledon if the grass was faster. wimbledon is obviously quite fast though.

    plz plz plz plz plz dont say that murray is a better GC player than roddick simply because he beat roddick in 06. a one time win on grass isn't evidence for being better than someone on that particular surface
     
    #1
  2. mzzmuaa

    mzzmuaa Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    421
    murray and djokovic will have no problem neutralizing his serve and attempt at a power game.
    they are better GC players and neither of them have won wimbledon.
     
    #2
  3. RoddickAce

    RoddickAce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,461
    Back in 2003 and 2004, I think Roddick was a better grass court player than current Murray or Djokovic. Roddick right now doesn't play the same way he did back then.
     
    #3
  4. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,545
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Actually I think Ken Rosewall was the best grasscourt player to never win Wimbledon with an honorable mention to Ilie Nastase.
     
    #4
  5. tudwell

    tudwell Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,409
    Rosewall, Wilander, Lendl... definitely not Roddick.
     
    #5
  6. Staiger

    Staiger Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    481
    Tim Henman -he should have won at least once. It was perfect for S&V .
     
    #6
  7. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO you are kiddin me right?????????????????


    he got to 4 semi finals..........roddick got to 2 finals a semi and a QF. actually, henman probably was an overachiever on grass, and actually in the context of his whole career
     
    #7
  8. snark

    snark Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    241

    Yeah, I would say Lendl. He came so close so many times.
     
    #8
  9. Lsmkenpo

    Lsmkenpo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,915
    I think so, and still think his best chance at another grandslam is at Wimbledon, he is a better all court player now than ever before.
     
    #9
  10. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    Fed is horrible matchup for him. You cant win Wimby if you cant beat Fed!
     
    #10
  11. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    Hell no!!!!!!!! Not even close. Pancho Gonzales, Ken Rosewall... damn, even Ivan Lendl and Mats Wilander I'd have ahead of him. Is this a serious question??

    Well thenagain most assume if not for the pro/open era split both Gonazles and Rosewall would have Wimbledon titles. But that still leaves him behind Lendl and Wilander.
     
    #11
  12. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    I think that Roddick's grasscourt resume is vastly overrated. Yeah he made it to two finals, but he never really beat a good, top level player en route to those two finals. And yeah he has the big serve, but that has been broken down over the past few years in his losses. For a guy with a serve as big as his, it just shows how weak his all around game is that he hasn't been able to win Wimbledon. And yes he made it to two finals, but you could argue he got good draws. I think Hewitt would have taken him out, had he been in Roddick's side of the draw. 4 Queens titles is impressive, but he's never beaten a top 10 player at Wimbledon.

    http://www.atpworldtour.com/tennis/...=0&player=R485&selTournament=540&prevtrnnum=0
     
    #12
  13. gj011

    gj011 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,548
    Location:
    Back from prison
    No. Not even close.
     
    #13
  14. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165

    um roddick beat hewitt on grass............
     
    #14
  15. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    ^^^true, he did beat Hewitt in Queen's. I still think Hewitt would have beaten Roddick at Wimbledon, on the slower grass. Hewitt owned Roddick at his peak, besides that one match. It was 6-1 Hewitt, but Roddick's won the last 3 meetings.
     
    #15
  16. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    if you are talking 90s grass...definitely---

    he would at least have 3-4 wimbys---hell, even krajicek got one...talk about a weak era dominated by the serve...

    karlovic would've got a couple back then...
     
    #16
  17. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    But Roddick never played on 90s grass, so we don't know.
     
    #17
  18. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,834
    Location:
    New York City
    Patrick Rafter.
     
    #18
  19. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    no, but we can infer...
    he has a better serve, forehand and backhand than sampras
    his net game is weaker but if he played in a S&V era it would be better (edit: than it is now)
     
    #19
  20. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    Serve? No, what planet are you on?
    FH? At Roddick's peak, maybe, but not today with Roddick's loopy topspin FH.
    BH? Neither one was really good, but I think Sampras's superior net game is enough to end the argument. And S&V era? With Agassi & Courier around winning slams, I don't think it was really an era, at least not during the 90s.
     
    #20
  21. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    Roddick is very effective on grass but not sure if I would necessarily call him a great grasscourt player. This may sound counterintuitive but likewise I don't consider Chang a great clay courter despite him having won a French Open. Maybe I'll have to revise my definition at some point, because the grass has really changed in terms of playing characteristics, but guys like Mac, Sampras, Becker, and Fed are who I consider greats on grass.
     
    #21
  22. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    ^^^Agreed.
     
    #22
  23. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,545
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Dang....I had thought of Rafter and was going to post....

    Foiled again...
     
    #23
  24. smart_player

    smart_player Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    124
    yeah rafter i would for sure agree
     
    #24
  25. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    Open era I always think Wilander
    Pre Open era Rosewell and Pancho but those are for reasons like not being able to play wimby.

    Open era though Wilander won 2 grass court slams and beat McEnroe on fast grass at Australia which some sources feel was at points faster than wimbledon. He had some mental block in England though. He had convincing victories over top players in his two Australian Open runs on grass..it is kind of sad.

    Though Rafter is my close second as he lost to the man on fire twice..Sampras and than Goran.
     
    #25
  26. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    oh god..mind you roddick is 28 not 23 anymore and they are 22..gosh and doesn't djokovic get his ass handed to him by roddick as of late?
     
    #26
  27. Leublu tennis

    Leublu tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,429
    Location:
    Moldova
    Ever?? I was hoping that this was a poll so I could just safely say "no".
     
    #27
  28. Jchurch

    Jchurch Guest

    Agreed. His forehand now just looks like it must hurt. That forehand in the 2004 Wimbledon final was amazing.
     
    #28
  29. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    hell to the NO!
     
    #29
  30. Gorecki

    Gorecki G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,215
    Location:
    Puerto y Galgo....
    lets forget Rafter, Rosewall, Wilander, Lendl, Tanner...

    and pretend tennis was invented by early 2000's
     
    #30
  31. petetheileet

    petetheileet Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    206
    Id say rafter...

    he was a chance at winning both of his finals
     
    #31
  32. Madhoshi22

    Madhoshi22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    Location:
    Texas
    I wouldn't even consider a real GC player...
    He used brute force in 04/05, no real thought to his play. Don't get me wrong, he had an enormous serve, but that seemed to be the only thing he showed a slight idea of knowing how to use on grass. Other than that, his volleys are sub-par at best, groundies are average, I definitely wouldn't consider him the best GC player not to win Wimby.
     
    #32
  33. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,698
    I'm with gj011 on this one.
     
    #33
  34. RoddickAce

    RoddickAce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,461
    I'm sure Ivanisevic is glad he managed to avoid being nominated in this thread. Had he not won Wimbledon at the last moments of his career, I would seriously consider him the best grasscourt player never to win Wimbledon.
     
    #34
  35. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
    Roddick the best? Hell I thought Rafter looked better on grass than Roddick. Roddick a "great" grass courter? Great Grass court players would have at least one Wimbeldon to their resume
     
    #35
  36. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    I think he got robbed. If the grass wasn't slowed at Wimbeldon, Roddick's service at it's prime could have won him one, maybe even 2 Wimby's.

    Federer never won RG, does that mean he sucks on clay?
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2009
    #36
  37. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2009
    #37
  38. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    He got robbed? Great players adapt to all surfaces, all speeds, and don't just win because of one weapon. Great players adapt. (Ex. Nadal, Federer) Roddick has played on the slower grass for the past 5-6 yrs, he should have adapted a more all around game to win a Wimbledon, instead of relying so much on his serve. That is why he has never won Wimbledon. He is not an all around great player.
     
    #38
  39. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    you shouldn't have to be a great all around player to win wimbledon - well, you do now as its green clay
     
    #39
  40. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,705
    Location:
    VA Beach
    So you're admitting that Roddick's a one trick pony?
     
    #40
  41. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,672
    Is this the most pathetic post ever or what? Do you think Roddick will have a chance against Pete Sampras in the 90s? He can't even beat Federer. How the hell is he going to beat prime Sampras at Wimbledon? :confused::confused:
     
    #41
  42. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    Uh huh... yeah. Rafter > Roddick on grass. People talking about if it wasn't for Fed, well in the 90's Roddick sees Agassi and doesn't see the final.
     
    #42
  43. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    Roddick's serve, forehand and backhand superioer to Sampras'?? On what planet?? Mars??? What are you on???

    Leave Tina alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #43
  44. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,123
    Krajicek was a great player. He was one of the good serve and volleyers of his time, and his forehand was good as well. There's nothing wrong with serve& volley. Besides, the guy beat Pete Sampras on his way to win it as well, which is not just 'some guy' on grass
     
    #44
  45. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    roddick's only win against AA came on grass
     
    #45
  46. MethodTennis

    MethodTennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,602
    out of players still playing on the atp at their peak he is the best not to win it but if djock and murray keep improvin his 03/04 ability will be no where near as good as theres and lendl never won wimbeldon
     
    #46
  47. Grampy

    Grampy Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    102
    Lendl > Roddick by far.
     
    #47
  48. MethodTennis

    MethodTennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,602
    ye roddick would get his BACKSIDE kicked off of lendl
     
    #48
  49. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    And your point wuld be....??? You mean 7-6 in the 3rd (an 8-6 tie break) vs 33 yr old Agassi. Is Roddick going to beat Agassi at his peak at SW19?? I mean name the the 20 players Roddick has beaten at Wimbledon.
     
    #49
  50. devila

    devila Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,749
    Your precious Blake thanked him. He needed a fat Roddick who struggled on every surface, to move and serve precisely against every opponent, not just Federer. You conveniently left out Federer's easy Halle draws and crap draws on hardcourts and clay. Hewitt, Clement, Stepanek and Ferrero embarrassed Federer and Nadal too. Soderling and Rochus choked badly against Fed on grass courts, as Roddick did. Since 2006, Roddick cancelled matches with severe injuries and bulimic symptoms.
     
    #50

Share This Page