Is Sinner vs Medvedev in a GS final good for tennis?

Will Sinner or Medvedev bring new viewers to tennis?

  • Yes

    Votes: 71 78.0%
  • No

    Votes: 20 22.0%

  • Total voters
    91

aman92

Legend
Neither player has one shred of charisma, though Med can be funny if he starts getting angry with the crowd. Med also has possibly the ugliest game of an elite player, maybe ever. But Sinner breaking through to win his first slam is good for new gen and tennis. Let's just say this final will generate about 1% of the interest a Federer-Nadal final used to generate, but that's a high bar. A Mannarino-Gilles Simon final would be the lowest possible bar.

It won't bring new fans since so few people will be watching it, especially outside Europe.
Med is pretty charismatic...I'll give him that
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
I've never liked last man standing tennis. So I hope Sinner wins.

I also hope Sinner, Alcaraz and Rune will find ways to beat the pure baseline players and give us more variety in the years to come.
I thought they were all pure baseliner players. I don't remember any other type since Michael Llodra.
 

Sipho

Rookie
Sampras is the single reason they slowed down the courts. His matches with guys like Scud and Rusedski were total snooze fests. Every point was short, S&V. Might be impressive to us devotees but was terrible for ratings and attendance.

Yeah, you had to want to watch Sampras and those guys. Otherwise it was boring as hell. :giggle:

I hated that they slowed down everything, but I totally understand it.

Not sure why an athlete being mid 30s dominating is considered bad. Did you forget Barry Bonds, Kipchoge, etc.
In terms of Kipchoge, yeah, at the elite level, for a while now people didn't usually start running marathons until they felt that they were too slow for the track. So mid to late 20s. Or even 30s. Kipchoge didn't start until he was around 29.

That's changing now though, of course. Kelvin Kiptum just ran 2:00:35 in Chicago in October, breaking Kipchoge's 2:01:09 set in Berlin in 2022. And Kelvin Kiptum is 23. Well, Kenyan "23." So maybe add a couple of years.

So in a way it's a little like tennis. The old guy was good until the next young guy(s) came along. And the other pervious young guys simply weren't as good as the old guy, and his dominance had more to do with them than him.

(Well, it's kind of the same, but not really. Alberto Salazar won his first New York City Marathon in 1980 when he was 22, so... anyway. ) :giggle:
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
I thought they were all pure baseliner players. I don't remember any other type since Michael Llodra.

Ah, Llodra... They don't make 'em like that anymore...

Alcaraz, Rune, Sinner > > > Rublev, Khachanov, Medvedev (for me, at least, they are more offensive and willing to use the court more)
 

chjtennis

G.O.A.T.

Q: Is Sinner vs Medvedev in a GS final good for tennis?​

Definitely. This is what tennis fans have been waiting for. New generation of good players taking over from The Golden Generation.
 

Arak

Legend
Well, those are the guys who made it to the final. Would I have liked Alcaraz to be in the final? Certainly yes. Would it have been a better spectacle? No idea. Those guys made it to the final because they won all their matches. We shouldn’t be disrespectful to them. Sinner eliminated Djokovic so that’s that. Medvedev was lucky that Zverev eliminated Alcaraz for him but draws will always have an element of luck involved. Anyway, I think it will be a very entertaining final, certainly better than Djokovic vs Berrettini or Djokovic vs Kyrgios.
 

TennisBro

Professional
In terms of style none of them are all court players. One is an aggressive baseliner and the other is a pusher (no spin or pace).
Here is some statistics on how often players come to the net compared to their groundstrokes:

Jannik Sinner 3,7%
Novak Djokovic 3,12%
Alcaraz 6,02%
Holger Rune 7,85%
Federer 6,69%
Medvedev 2,7%

Source: http://www.tennisabstract.com
I like your reasoning and the supposition that neither Medvedev nor Sinner are good examples for future tennis players, recreational tennis and fans of the sport. Daniil's lumberjack and Jannick's baseline robotic styles are a proof of where the sport is going. Many, to be professional, tennis players train hard to be physically fit and able to return as many opponents balls as possible and to find holes in their game now. I bet that both of those AO finalists have fancied Djoker for quite a few years to do what they do now. The ones, who craved to play like Federer, have not succeeded unfortunately. Carlos and Holger have been the hope for more exciting tennis, so let's hope that the young Spaniard and Dane straighten up their mental issues that I see are holding them back behind the currently not so exemplary top tennis players.
 

tex123

Hall of Fame
In terms of style none of them are all court players. One is an aggressive baseliner and the other is a pusher (no spin or pace).
Here is some statistics on how often players come to the net compared to their groundstrokes:

Jannik Sinner 3,7%
Novak Djokovic 3,12%
Alcaraz 6,02%
Holger Rune 7,85%
Federer 6,69%
Medvedev 2,7%

Source: http://www.tennisabstract.com
A fun fact is that Federer has earned 550 million usd and Djoker has earned 240 million USD. There is almost a direct correlation between how many times they went to the net.

Tennis has decreased in popularity since the 80’s where the game was much more all court oriented. Is the decline in popularity a direct consequence of how the game has developed?
Do you even know what a pusher is? Who has no spin-no pace? Care to check the numbers?

Unorthodox technique does not mean no spin no pace. All groundies have spin. That's how the ball lands on the court.
 

Impetus

Semi-Pro
Let me also give my own bias.

I don't think either of them sell any tickets to the circus to a new audiens.

Game style 2/10
Grace/movement/looks 2/10
Charisma and showmanship 2/10
Tennis ability 9,5/10
Drama and scandals 3/10

I know the tennis community want the new gen to win. So do I. We want new blood. We want progress and we want the new to be better than the old. But some of us also want attractive tennis.
 
Last edited:

longtimelurker

Professional
Sinner
Neither player has one shred of charisma, though Med can be funny if he starts getting angry with the crowd. Med also has possibly the ugliest game of an elite player, maybe ever. But Sinner breaking through to win his first slam is good for new gen and tennis. Let's just say this final will generate about 1% of the interest a Federer-Nadal final used to generate, but that's a high bar. A Mannarino-Gilles Simon final would be the lowest possible bar.

It won't bring new fans since so few people will be watching it, especially outside Europe.
Sinner has a ferrari and a model girlfriend who love$ him for hi$ chari$ma :cool:
 

sortof

Semi-Pro
I suppose this years final will be fairly neutral to tennis - perhaps a bit better in case Sinner wins it, because he is still very young and people are always craving for the appearance of the next young superstar. Looking back it seems that extended rivalries are really good for tennis. To name a few we had this among the big 3, and with Sampras versus Agassi, or for the WTA with say Seles and Graf. These rivalries polarize the fans and are therefore of great interest - and they tended to yield very entertaining tennis of the highest level. Maybe Sinner and Alcaraz can establish something in this direction, with Rune to join them eventually.
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
Probably not. I’m debating whether to stay up and watch it since it starts past midnight. I just don’t enjoy watching Medvedev. Might just catch the replay on TC tomorrow. If Djokovic or Alcaraz were in the final, I would watch live for sure.
 
Last edited:

B-Line

Rookie
My heart says Sinner, but the brain insists Medvedev will win... Probably in 5 sets of brutal tennis and break Sinner. Good to see two new faces in the final.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
My heart says Sinner, but the brain insists Medvedev will win... Probably in 5 sets of brutal tennis and break Sinner. Good to see two new faces in the final.
Sinner should win. And the way he’s playing - is the better player and more fresh.

I just wouldn’t count out med or be surprised if he pulled it out. He’s added some sneaky element to his game that he even didn’t realized was there all bc he was a bit cramped and fatigued.
 

Impetus

Semi-Pro
Sinner should win. And the way he’s playing - is the better player and more fresh.

I just wouldn’t count out med or be surprised if he pulled it out. He’s added some sneaky element to his game that he even didn’t realized was there all bc he was a bit cramped and fatigued.
What does that have to do with the price of cheese?

Can't you see what the topic is?
 

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
It's great to see a new winner as Djokovic has reigned supreme for a long time now which actually makes the sport look lacking in depth with a serial winner. However with regards to Sinner he isn't great box office with regards his playing style. He is an incredible ball striker but it's like watching a repeat of the same thing which is more do able over best of 3 at times. Best of 5 could be a big ask to stay the distance if it goes all the way which I think it will. Medvedev with that playing style is nightmare to play against, Sinner can find some nice angels though and that could be the difference as when you are as far back as Medvedev you have no chance on a nice angled shot.
 

bigbadboaz

Semi-Pro
It's two of the top younger stars coming through to compete for a major title, and one of them looks to be a potential emerging dominant figure.

In general terms, I don't see what more you could ask for in a final matchup.

I can't say that either of their games appeal to me - and yes, that could be a turnoff in the matchup drawing in borderline fans or growing the sport- but unfortunately there really aren't two better right now (including Alcaraz). That's undoubtedly a weak spot for the game, but at least the era seems to finally be shifting.
 

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Djoko-Alcaraz brings the best ratings easily
Yes, i was hoping for a sinner v alcaraz final which I am sure we may see at some point. Potentially US Open maybe but there's a few others who will have a say still. The first week was really exciting this year I thought but many matches in this second week have been disappointing to be honest.
 

Towny

Hall of Fame
It's good for tennis because it's a new name in a slam final without being two nobodies in a slam final. Sinner has been up and coming for the past few years. Like him or not, Medvedev is an established HC player. He's made 3 finals at the USO and the AO open.

In amy case, I expect this to be a fairly straightforward Sinner with, largely because Medvedev has very little left in the tank. You never know though.
 

DjokoLand

Hall of Fame
It’s good, because it is a 22 year old who has upped his level so much in the last few months and is ready to take that step vs a HC specialist who has 6 slam finals on HC but has yet to play anyone but Djokodal. Be interesting how it plays out
 
Top