Sampras is the single reason they slowed down the courts. His matches with guys like Scud and Rusedski were total snooze fests. Every point was short, S&V. Might be impressive to us devotees but was terrible for ratings and attendance.
Yeah, you had to want to watch Sampras and those guys. Otherwise it was boring as hell.
I hated that they slowed down everything, but I totally understand it.
Not sure why an athlete being mid 30s dominating is considered bad. Did you forget Barry Bonds, Kipchoge, etc.
In terms of Kipchoge, yeah, at the elite level, for a while now people didn't usually start running marathons until they felt that they were too slow for the track. So mid to late 20s. Or even 30s. Kipchoge didn't start until he was around 29.
That's changing now though, of course. Kelvin Kiptum just ran 2:00:35 in Chicago in October, breaking Kipchoge's 2:01:09 set in Berlin in 2022. And Kelvin Kiptum is 23. Well, Kenyan "23." So maybe add a couple of years.
So in a way it's a little like tennis. The old guy was good until the next young guy(s) came along. And the other pervious young guys simply weren't as good as the old guy, and his dominance had more to do with them than him.
(Well, it's kind of the same, but not really. Alberto Salazar won his first New York City Marathon in 1980 when he was 22, so... anyway. )