Is the Djokodal H2H particularly misleading in Novak’s favour?

[RS]

For what reason exactly? I swear most of these anti-vegans dislike the vegan movement because they feel like vegans are forcing an ideology onto wider society. Surely gatecrashing vegan events is the opposite of live and let live.

He said he wants to spread the "message".

Considering how he has expressed his views openly about how he feels on others and get's a buzz out of certain things it's not actually that surprising

If you want some context you can watch this.

 

[RS]

Yeah lol I'm not a fan of VG. I thinks he's a hateful guy who uses his status as a vegan as an excuse to hate on others and project his supposed moral superiority. I find it hard to believe that his empathy for animals is genuine considering how little he has for people and how sociopathic he comes across as a result. But he's made some funny videos over the years lol.

VG has been criticised by some vegans as well.

People tend to have different approaches.

 

[Mivic]

He said he wants to spread the "message".

Considering how he has expressed his views openly about how he feels on others and get's a buzz out of certain things it's not actually that surprising

If you want some context you can watch this.

I'll give it a watch a bit later when I have a few brain cells spare lol.

 

[Mivic]

VG has been criticised by some vegans as well.

People tend to have different approaches.

His approach is the worst possible one if he wants to spread the message of veganism in the most accessible way possible, which is ultimately what the aim should be if you're interested in minimising suffering, which is why I'm convinced that he's got ulterior motives and he uses his ideology as an excuse to hate on people, like a lot of social justice warriors do all under the veil of compassion.

 

[Backspin1183]

I didn't read the OP but yes it is misleading because Novak has more wins.

 

[RS]

His approach is the worst possible one if he wants to spread the message of veganism in the most accessible way possible, which is ultimately what the aim should be if you're interested in minimising suffering, which is why I'm convinced that he's got ulterior motives and he uses his ideology as an excuse to hate on people, like a lot of social justice warriors do all under the veil of compassion.

I heard in the video from another YouTuber he supposedly admitted to not caring about others feelings not sure how true this rumour is but that would explain his more aggressive approach.

 

[Deleted member 779124]

By form maybe favoured Djokovic more but by sheer number of matches on a surface compared to another in slams it favoured Nadal more with 9 matches at RG.

 

[Poisoned Slice]

 

[tudwell]

I don’t understand the idea that Novak has had any meaningful form advantage (whatever that really means). Nadal racked up half his career wins over Novak in a three-year period at the start of their respective careers. From June 2006 to May 2009, Nadal won 14 matches against Djokovic. In the next twelve years, he managed 14 more. Novak has no such period of such concentrated domination. That seems to indicate Nadal dominated a short span of time in which Novak was in relatively worse form, while Novak has been more reliably ahead in the rivalry since then – for the vast majority of their careers, through all the ups and downs of form.

Furthermore, they’ve played 32 matches in seasons where Nadal ended the year ranked higher, compared to 26 for Novak. They’ve met 30 times in years where Nadal won more slams than Novak, 17 times in years where Novak won more. This is with almost identical slam count overall. Their meetings have disproportionately occurred in seasons where Nadal was, by any reasonable metric, the better player, yet Djokovic leads overall. And this isn’t even getting into the surface skew!