Is the Federer/Nadal domination era..

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by babbette, Jan 9, 2009.

  1. babbette

    babbette Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    5,959
    ..really over?:( Or do you think there's still a chance that Federer will return to his best?
     
    #1
  2. David L

    David L Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,581
    Location:
    London
    Everything is possible, but I'll let you know for sure at the end of the year.
     
    #2
  3. sheq

    sheq Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,012
    Location:
    Istanbul-Turkey
    no its over..its not all about roger..its about we have a guy that is best on hardcourts and alsı we have nole close to him..and nadal is not as sharp as before
     
    #3
  4. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Not necessarily, however, other players on tour are definitely catching up, and making things very interesting. They've raised the bar so high, that the other younger players are adjusting, and improving as well. Federer/Nadal are still at their best, but when others catch up>> they aren't going to win, and win, and win, etc, etc, etc.

    Should be a very entertaining year.
     
    #4
  5. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    nadal still is the best clay player by far...so he is relatively safe...federer's reign on HC is falling down and his grass reign will be severly challenged now that murray has improved his game.
     
    #5
  6. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,552
    Location:
    Weak era
    On HC tour is definitely catching up,on clay I think that it will still be a one-man show in Nadal and on grass maybe it won't be just about Fed and Nadal this year,maybe guys like Tsonga or Murray could make thing more interesting even at Wimbledon,especially Murray who is improving rapidly as a player and has crowd support there.
     
    #6
  7. TennezSport

    TennezSport Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    Northern NJ, USA
    Rafa admits it

    Things may not be as easy for Rafa either anymore as the list of players that can trouble him is growing along with the challanges. Clay is still the safest surface for him as he is the master of that surface, but I think physically is where Rafa will pay the price. He finally admits in the latest issue of the USRSA Daily News (DailyTennisNews@racquettech.com) that the pressure of being #1 and the amount of play will be hard on him and his knees.

    As I have said on many occasion, 2K9 will be a very interesting year.

    Cheers, TennezSport :cool:
     
    #7
  8. Nuke

    Nuke Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,976
    Location:
    location, location, location
    Federer will never "return to his best." But he can still win a few titles here and there, and maybe a couple of Grand Slam events. He won't dominate like he did in the past few years. Age catches up with everyone.
     
    #8
  9. FraNkcn

    FraNkcn Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    This is the absolute truth, and yes 2009 will be a very good year.
    But just like Sampras and Agassi proved, just cause you're older, doesn't mean you still can't whip those youngin's in to shape. ^^
     
    #9
  10. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    "AGE"' has not caught up with him>>> more like the rest of the field has drastically improved.
     
    #10
  11. TennezSport

    TennezSport Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    Northern NJ, USA
    Agreed...............kinda

    While I agree with most of what you say, I do not think that age is a factor yet as according to research the ages of 25 to 30/32 are the strongest for men, so Fed should be perfect now. However, the ability to recover gets a little harder as you age. I believe the mental issue is the problem for Fed now as his confidence is shaken as the other players gain ground.

    2K9 will be a very interesting year to see if Fed can get the confidence back and also to see if Rafa can physically make it.

    Cheers, TennezSport :cool:
     
    #11
  12. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,689
    Even if Fed was "at his best" Murray would give him one hell of a problem. Murray DID beat Fed during Fed's 04-06 Run. He beat him at Cincinatti. Murray is like a Cyborg version of how Hewitt used to be. Except with a bigger serve and more to his arsenal. If Djoker and Murray werent around and Nadal was still a young pup, Fed would still be getting his 3 slams a year and winning a buttload of tournaments like he did before
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2009
    #12
  13. ksbh

    ksbh Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    4,155
    When it matters most, Nadal & Federer will step it up. These 2 are very very special. It's a mistake to write them off.

    I don't know about the AO but the FO, Wimbledon & the US Open will be taken by one of Nadal or Federer!

     
    #13
  14. JankovicFan

    JankovicFan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    611
    Nadal and Federer are 5 years apart and different player generations. They should be considered separately, unless merely referring to the long running #1-2 pairing. It certainly looks like Federer will eventually fall back, increasingly inconsistent, but he will more likely be displaced by Murray, not Djokovic.

    I just don't see Murray being a consistent threat going forward, because he can't do it without being in extreme training. That cannot be sustained indefinitely. For Federer, on the other hand, being physically capable is more natural. His issues are more in UEs and subpar first serve percentage. If he seriously tires, it certainly doesn't look like it.
     
    #14
  15. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    In general, clay is not the safest surface at all. It's the most neutralizing surface. It gives the most chance to new up and comers with ...... desire, burning desire.

    Grass used to be the hardest to run. The bounce and footwork on them. Plus grass season is so short it's hard to get any experience on it. So once you dominate it, it is somewhat protected. Sampras' 8 year domination, for example.

    But you know grass court tennis used to be very different from the rest of tour. Not any more. Nadal and Federer will not dominate there as much as last 3 year there any more. Federer was stopped at Wimbledon last year but he still pretty good chance to win there again. New up and comers still need more time to get to know the surface...
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2009
    #15
  16. tennisgirl90

    tennisgirl90 Guest

    Their authoritarian domination is over, but I'm sure they will win yet some Slams in the future. There are just a few good upcoming youngster, but it's not like Murray is gonna everything now.
     
    #16
  17. vtmike

    vtmike Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,658
    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah you are right.....Both players really perform at a different level alltogether in grand slams! lets see if Murray can match up their level of play then.....everyone is always very quick to jump on bandwagons.....Let him win a grandslam first!
    all this hoopla just based on a Qatar Open '09 semi final... sheesh :rolleyes:
     
    #17
  18. rubberduckies

    rubberduckies Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,254
    Nadal still has his clay court domination. Murray and Djokovic have all but erased the gap on hard court. Simon is very dangerous despite the unfair criticism he gets in these boards. Tsonga is deadly. The player I'm looking forward to is Gulbis. He can hit people off the court in a way that nobody else can. If he can muster a Tsonga/Simon/Del Potro-like breakthrough this year and then a Murray/Djokovic-like breakthrough the next, then watch out.
     
    #18
  19. JankovicFan

    JankovicFan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    611
    More Gulbis-Schmulbis. He needs to do something better than a QF or two. Being rich, reasonably good looking, and hitting UEs with power and pinnache is not good enough. People talk about him like he is a peer of the top 10, when he definitely has yet to prove himself and get even in the same league. He has fallen in ranking rather than risen. Good luck to him, but he ain't a star...not yet.
     
    #19
  20. ksbh

    ksbh Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    4,155
    Exactly! But that's the way things are in this forum :)

     
    #20
  21. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    Murray has always had one of the best minds in the game.... he "knows" how to play against Roger.

    When Andy "learns" to go deep at hardcourt slams, then he's going to win, i think its his time

    which kinda sucks, because even though i am a fan, and i do hope he wins Wimbledon.... i personally find his game to be boring.... there's no magic

    Roger has magic whenever he plays well

    Nadal's athleticism and his amazing defense have always been great to watch as well- Nadal finally winning at Wimbledon was 4 years in the making - 05- sucked on grass 06- surprise finalist got blown off court by Roger 07- went toe to toe with Roger in a great contest 08- went toe to toe with Roger and dethroned the king

    Murray.... eh, i don't know- solid player, great backhand, great speed, amazing first serve- solid tactics.... but his game just screams "safe/boring"
     
    #21
  22. aphex

    aphex Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,263
    Location:
    athens, greece
    as much as i hate to agree with the *********, i'm not blind...
    yes, the best of federer is behind us--there is not that spark, that explosiveness anymore...he 's lost that half-step we talk about-that half step that makes all the difference...

    yes he will win 2-3 more slams, but we will never again have those moments (i dont know if anyone else had them:)) that you sat there in front of your tv smiling, unable to believe what you were watching...

    the notion that he's losing because of the new guys is ridiculous btw...'04-'06 federer would've demolished the murrays and djokovics like he did everyone else...
     
    #22

Share This Page