Everyone harped on Jankovic for being number 1 without winning a slam well both Mauresmo and Clijsters were number 1 before winning a slam and neither won a slam until 2 years after they were ranked number 1 for the first time. Is it cause they were not year end number 1. Well Davenport was year end number 1 4 times and only 1 of those years did she actually win a slam. Though for the other 3 Davenport had allready won her slams but I am wondering I mean it was different as Clijisters had no less than a semi in slam that year and was winning titles left and right but Mauresmo like Jankovic had never been to a final and did not win so many titles. I just never remember either of them getting as bad a rap as Jankovic did. Am I wrong? If they did not why so?