karlovic... if

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by ubermeyer, Sep 19, 2009.

  1. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    If Karlovic had had proper training in his early years and was born 10-15 years earlier (and had his prime ten or 15 years ago), how good do you think he could have been on the 90's grass? I think he could have made the finals of Wimbledon at least a few times, maybe even winning.
     
    #1
  2. tudwell

    tudwell Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,408
    He would be Goran Ivanisevic.
     
    #2
  3. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Except Karlovic is not a head case and he doesn't DF half the time, so his serve is actually better.
     
    #3
  4. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    his serve is objectively BETTER even now, yet may be less effective because of the slower courts.
     
    #4
  5. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Well, Goran's first serve was pretty much as unreturnable as Ivo's. He is a lefty. I think Ivo serves a higher percentage, and his second serve is very solid. For sure, overall - a noticeable edge to Ivo.
     
    #5
  6. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    Karlovic would have been tougher to beat during the 90's because it was easier to serve and volley.
     
    #6
  7. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    I think Goran's 2nd serve was better than Karlovic. Sure he double faulted more, but he hit more 2nd serve aces than double faults, so it evens out. Of the 78 aces Karlovic hit in Davis Cup, only 1 was a 2nd serve ace. Ivanisevic routinely hit 2nd serve aces mainly because he was a headcase, but his 2nd serve was a beast second to only Sampras. Otherwise, Karlovic's 1st serve is way better than Ivanisevic's
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2009
    #7
  8. ericsson

    ericsson Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,679
    Location:
    Land of beer and chocolate
    Well i wouldnt say that, infact Ivanisevic's first serv is amongst the best in the world, even former champions admit that.
     
    #8
  9. Claudius

    Claudius Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Whose serve was deadlier: Sampras' or Ivanisevic's?
     
    #9
  10. Kick Serve 14

    Kick Serve 14 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,021
    sampras... i think the grand slam total will vouch for that...
     
    #10
  11. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    Yes it is. Ivanisevic may have the most aces of all time on his first serve, but because Karlovic simply is a giant, the height of the serve's bounce made it unreturnable. Ivanisevic's serve was much easier to return if you could get the racket on it. Karlovic has the same ace potential as Goran but also has a much better unreturnable serve statistic than Ivanisevic.
     
    #11
  12. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    I think Ivanisevic's serve overall was better than Pete. Pete was just better in clutch situations and had a better overall game than Goran which is why he held more.
     
    #12
  13. tennisdad65

    tennisdad65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    3,030
    Location:
    somewhere in calif
    Sampras's overall game was far superior to Ivanisevic's, but as far as serve goes, they were almost even.
     
    #13
  14. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    Ivanisevic had more power, sidespin, disguise, and aces than Pete. Pete had more clutch serving ability, topspin, and consistency. They both were about even in accuracy.
     
    #14
  15. Cesc Fabregas

    Cesc Fabregas Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    8,318
    Are you serious? Goran is much much much more talented than the one trick pony Karlovic.
     
    #15
  16. Kick Serve 14

    Kick Serve 14 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,021
    This is true...
     
    #16
  17. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    Yes but Karlovic has a much much better serve. Goran has better... everything else. that is why he isn't a one trick pony but Karlovic is.
     
    #17
  18. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    Ivanisevic's serve is amongst the best ever, but Karlovic's is THE best ever, and is far superior. the reason Goran has the ace records is because he was in his serving prime when the courts were much faster.
     
    #18
  19. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    Ivanisevic's 2nd serve, maybe better than Ivo's. But if Ivo had Isner's 2nd serve... he'd be even better. Perhaps if he had been properly coached he could have honed his 2nd serve to a big weapon as well.
     
    #19
  20. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,492
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Huh? I was talking about serve and serve alone. Mentally, Goran is a total head case. Otherwise he would definitely have more than 1 slam.

    DF is more of a negative than an ace is a positive. They don't even out. If you are down a break point and serve a double, you are broken. Truth is, if you watch any Sampras - Ivanisevic match, you would notice that the big difference was that Pete had a reliable and good second serve while Goran didn't.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2009
    #20
  21. Casticus

    Casticus New User

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    26
    What does your comment have anything to do with this thread or anyone's post? No one is comparing their overall talent. When the serve goes in, I think their serve is equal, but since Karlovic is more consistant and more clutch with that serve, his serve is much much better. The rest of the game.. not so much.
     
    #21
  22. maddogz32

    maddogz32 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    481
    Location:
    texas
    he would have been a good match for goran ivansivec
     
    #22
  23. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    can somebody tell me what actually happened with the croatian tennis federation? I know he had barely any real courts to play on and nobody to practice with in his early childhood. Why did the association snub his family even when he was showing talent and results?
     
    #23
  24. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    The Croatian tennis federation treated everyone equal. Too equal. Instead of being singled out as a good player, he received group coaching with 80 other kids and just 1 coach.
     
    #24
  25. ubermeyer

    ubermeyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,176
    Location:
    Texas
    but how come it seems like he feels that he was never properly taught how to hit a backhand (yes he said this) and that he never got to play enough with anybody else, instead just having to practice his serve? He also seemed to think that Ljubicic and others got all the money and all the attention... if they were also treated equal, then this wouldn't be the case right?
     
    #25
  26. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    Well it's not Karlovic's fault that he didnt receive special attention from the coach even though he was a special talent and had to hit with the other 79 crappy players. Should have gone to Nicola Pilic's academy.
     
    #26
  27. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    He still wouldn't win any slam. Goran was basically a much better version of Karlovic, and he still won 0 Slam in the 90s(he won it in 2001). Karlovic shouldn't have a chance in hell to win a slam if Goran couldn't even manage to win one.
     
    #27
  28. bakla

    bakla New User

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Karlovic's serve is amazing because he spent his entire life with no opponents, all he could do was practice his serve.

    If he had opponents all his life, he would not have practiced his serve so much and it wouldn't be this good.
     
    #28

Share This Page