Discussion in 'Racquets' started by lilxjohnyy, Oct 24, 2007.
has anyone who originally used the k95 or n95 switched to the pro staff original 95 ???
i use to use an n 95 18x20 (before i switched to a flexpoint prestige then the ps 6.0 95)
I find the ps 6.0 95 to be a far superior racket.
The n-sixone was too boardy, felt muted and swung to heavy IMO. The 6.0 95 has much nicer feel-- do not let the RDC stiffness ratings fool you, it is by no means a stiff racket.
I actually find it quite comfortable, i switched from the FXP due to tennis elbow and have been great with the ps 6.0.
i just got mine today and im loving the thin beam and matte finish !!!
Same here. I got tennis elbow from using a Head racquet a few years ago. Then I switched to the PS 6.0 95 and my tennis elbow went away. Best move I ever made.
I think a lot of Head racquets are too light and too stiff, which can cause tennis elbow.
i too moved from a Head racquet which gave me a tennis elbow to the PS 6.0 95. great feel, no elbow pains despite hard hitting, 12 hours a week.
(I have not tried the K95 or ncode 95).
There is another recent thread where most people said that of the 3 (k95, ncode 95 and PS 6.0 95) they preferred the PS.
^^ actually in that thread the kfactor and ncode tied and the prostaff was last ...
^ you must be talking about something different. in the poll, PS 95 came in at first, with almost as many votes as k95 and n95 combined, if im correct. if not, it was still a huge margin.
it was called something like "Wilson Midplus - choose your weapon"
This is just the tread I was looking for. I'm currently recovering from TE. Due to what I believe was backhand technique and equipment combination. I was playing with a K6.1 Team and am going to demo the PS 95. Ten years ago I use to play with the PS 85.
Separate names with a comma.