List the racquet companies Best to worst for: Quality controls

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by kungfusmkim, Apr 1, 2008.

  1. kungfusmkim

    kungfusmkim Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,038
    Location:
    Toronto
    Can any one give me a good look at hic companies have good quality control and whch dont?
     
    #1
  2. Ryoma Kun

    Ryoma Kun Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    fischer SHOULD have the best quality control with their vacuum process, plus they even garuntee it on those racquets

    in my experience i've seen wilsons fluctuate .5 ounces and balance +/- 3pts.

    ---
    After getting on a preferred player package/college package i notice all my racquets are matching now, a nice benefit!
     
    #2
  3. Alexio92

    Alexio92 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,120
    Best 3
    Vantage
    Fischer
    Yonex

    Worst 3
    Wilson
    Wilson
    Wilson
     
    #3
  4. AT92292

    AT92292 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    561
    Dunlop!!!!!
     
    #4
  5. kungfusmkim

    kungfusmkim Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,038
    Location:
    Toronto
    th for your input ghuybut has any one have nay idea why people still use wilson? all i see are wilson and babolats every where in my tennis club
     
    #5
  6. toughshot

    toughshot Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    281
    marketing ploys

    they spend so much money on advertising
     
    #6
  7. str33t

    str33t Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,334
    Yonex has amazing quality. The fit and finish on the racquets are great.
     
    #7
  8. hewittfan3

    hewittfan3 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Out of the compaines I have tried I would rank them as:

    Yonex-love it
    Wilson-close second
    Prince
    Head
    Babolat-hate it
     
    #8
  9. racquet_jedi

    racquet_jedi Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,222
    People remain uninformed/it does not bother them...
     
    #9
  10. Ryoma Kun

    Ryoma Kun Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    because using a wilson or babolat immediately gives you the talent of either roger federer or rafael nadal
     
    #10
  11. tzinc

    tzinc Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    Messages:
    631
    Location:
    On Red Clay
    Babolat has much better quality control then Wilson. Wilson is the worst by far.
     
    #11
  12. jazar

    jazar Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,171
    Location:
    London
    i once found a 30g difference between new stock 03 red grip 1's and grip 5's, so i would have to say prince
     
    #12
  13. BNK

    BNK Rookie

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    This guy bought 2 K95 at different time from authorized dealer and they have different spec after being measured(Balance, weight and handle size); he took pics and emailed wilson and asked for exchange from the dealer and they let him select from about 15 K95s which he said all have slight differences. Later on, wilson replied with the forwarded email from the chinese manufacturer saying that batches have range for their specs 320 -/+ 5 gr.

    [​IMG]

    note: This picture belonged to Nawin, Regentville tennis
     
    #13
  14. 0d1n

    0d1n Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,726
    Location:
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    From the ones I tried (i.e bought multiple rackets of the same model). I'm considering Quality Control means consistency in specs, and NOT build quality (i.e paint job quality, grommets quality... etc etc).
    If I would take into account build quality, Volkl would be higher than "new" Yonex for sure ...

    1 Vantage
    2 Fischer/Yonex
    3 Volkl/Head/Dunlop
    ...................
    x Wilson

    I don't think I've ever owned multiple rackets of the same model from Babolat, Prince, and never owned ANY TF, PK,Gamma, Kneissl, BB, Donnay or Avery (none)...so I can't comment on those. I have hit with various models from a few of those companies, but I never had the chance to have more than 1 racket for tests so they don't apply in the Quality Control discussion (for me ;) ).
     
    #14
  15. iplaybetter

    iplaybetter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,441
    Location:
    behind you, but i have to be somewhere else by the
    i think tecnifibre is great by two frames were like a gram or two off and that was due to diferent string and something else
     
    #15
  16. paperduetoday

    paperduetoday New User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    courts
    Best :
    1. Fischer
    2. Yonex
    3. Prince (O3)
    Worst :
    1. Wilson
    2. Head
    3. Babolat
     
    #16
  17. LoveThisGame

    LoveThisGame Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,016
    1. Volkl
    2. Prince
    .
    .
    .
    Wilson
    Gamma
     
    #17
  18. PROTENNIS63

    PROTENNIS63 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,722
    Boris Becker are very good. Yonex is great as well. I am sure Fischer has good quality control with their guarantee.
     
    #18
  19. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    yonex is proly best since everything else is made in china now.

    fischer used to be good but it had some issues like inconsistencies in the lengths of racquets...

    i have now 3 head frames and their grip sizes are inconsistent.
     
    #19
  20. HeadPrestige

    HeadPrestige Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Messages:
    893
    Best:
    Yonex
    Head

    Worst
    BABOLAT
    Wilson (my 6.0s are matched though =) )
     
    #20
  21. kungfusmkim

    kungfusmkim Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,038
    Location:
    Toronto
    Thx for the more input. yeah i seein yonex racquet that only the racquet that arent really popular are made in china. Does it really matter where itis made or is because people wh work in china makes so many flaws because of to much work?
     
    #21
  22. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    people always think just because it's made from china it's going to be bad. that's not the case. it depends on the individual factories in China. i'm pretty sure nobadmojo or someone made the comment that vantage racquets were made in China, but whether thats true or not i don't know. most racquets are made from China though because of the labor cost. The quality control i would say depends more on the tolerance by the brand names to enforce.

    so are you planning on buying multiple racquets at the same time? also tw does offer a matching service for a fee.
     
    #22
  23. Pushmaster

    Pushmaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,768
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    I'm really diggin' my RDX 500 mid, it's one of the best performing racquets to come out in recent years. However, I strongly disagree with your take on the fit and finish quality. The paint chips off my RDX even if I look at it the wrong way! Plus the bumperguard and buttcap is very cheesy and unsubstantial. I have a 20+ year old R-22 that's gotten much more use than my RDX and it still looks great, my RDX looks like it's been through a war. Unfortunately cosmetic QC for Yonex had gone down the tubes, but at least they still make (at least up to the RDX) great playing sticks. I guess you can't have it all...
     
    #23
  24. ryohazuki222

    ryohazuki222 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    494
    Prince is pretty bad... Some weight differences are minor... but if the weight difference is enough to actually easily feel it in your hand it's pretty bad. I've had this experience with half of my prince rackets. Possibly it's better now.... when I played with the TT Warrior MP, it wasn't so bad.

    Wilson is horrible. My friend has two nblades, and my gf has one. All three have visibly different head sizes and feel different
     
    #24
  25. brownyazn

    brownyazn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    118
    can someone clear this up?

    i see a bunch of people saying opposite things
     
    #25
  26. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    ^^^Wilson is the best.

    Yonex is not so good. :)
     
    #26
  27. Pushmaster

    Pushmaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,768
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Drak, Wilson's QC is nothing to write home about either. :wink:
     
    #27
  28. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    ^^^I was being sarcastic.

    However, to be honest, I have never had a problem with Wilson, or any other companies quality control.

    All 3 K90's I had were identical in specs. (SW, flex, balance, and static weight). Lastly, I didn't buy them together. All 3 were purchased at different times.
     
    #28
  29. Pushmaster

    Pushmaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,768
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    ^^ I was being sarcastic as well.

    Since the K90 is new and might all come from the same batch it's understandable that the specs are pretty much the same, glad they work for you.

    I bought a PS 6.0 95 from TW's second to last batch and loved it, wanted to order another but they were sold out. Bought 2 from the last batch and they felt much stiffer and lighter than the 1st one I bought. So my experience tells me the not all PS 6.0 95's are the same unfortunately.
     
    #29
  30. HeadPrestige

    HeadPrestige Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Messages:
    893
    i bought 2 of mine matched from the last TW batch, and one more from the bay... new. They are all identical, i got lucky.
     
    #30
  31. Pushmaster

    Pushmaster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,768
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Well, they probably all came from the last batch, so that's why they're all the same. Like I said, the older PS 6.0 95's were heavier and more flexible, which I prefer. I found the last ones too light and stiff. I had to get rid of them because they were killing my elbow. The older ones were more comfortable and forgiving.
     
    #31
  32. 0d1n

    0d1n Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,726
    Location:
    Cluj-Napoca, Romania
    Sorry, but the "fit and finish" part is not true in my experience (I've had similar experience to Pushmaster's) ...which is why I said that if build quality would be considered Volkl would be waaaaaay up there (above yonex) in my book.
    Their (yonex) paint chips easily, and their newer bumper guards are crap (I have a friend who uses the RDS 001's and his grommets were screwed @ the second stringing).
    Some of their rackets play great (I loved the RD 7) but the "fit and finish" which in my book is paint/grip/grommets quality and "sturdiness" is nothing spectacular.
     
    #32

Share This Page