LM Prestige Midplus VS I.prestige Midplus

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by spinbalz, Apr 17, 2004.

  1. spinbalz

    spinbalz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,676
    Finaly, who likes the LM prestige Midplus more than the I.Prestige Midplus (price is not a concern in my question)? Why?

    If you still prefer the I.prestige Midplus, Why (price is not a concern again)?
     
    #1
  2. Anonymous

    Anonymous Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    878
    i.prestige
    it feels a lot more solid, i feel like i have better touch from both the baseline and the net nad better control. the LM feels like it has more power, it does indeed have a larger sweetspot, but if you're using a prestige u shoudl always be hittin it there. i think both racquets look awesome! also, if you have arm problems i felt the LM was quite soft and easy on the arm, so if this is a concern the LM may be better

    Bobby
     
    #2
  3. uk_skippy

    uk_skippy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,054
    Location:
    Waterlooville, Hampshire, UK
    Ill second liuser22.

    I prefer the solidness of the i over the LM, although I dont think the LM has more power than the i.

    Also the LM is lighter than the i.I had to add quite a bit of weight to the LM to get near my i's.
     
    #3

Share This Page