Mac's suggestion that men should play 2 out of 3

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by mcenroefan, Jul 1, 2012.

  1. mcenroefan

    mcenroefan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,527
    Any thoughts on J Mac's opinion that men should start playing 2 of 3 instead of 3 of 5? I believe the implication is that it is a better test of tennis skill as opposed to stamina. In today's era, this is a particulalry interesting and thought provoking suggestion.

    Thoughts?
     
    #1
  2. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    If that was the case, Federer would have been out of this year's Wimbledon already :)
     
    #2
  3. forzamilan90

    forzamilan90 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,551
    IDK about that, that would diverge from history in a big way, having the guys play less sets. I like the current system as it is.
     
    #3
  4. iriraz

    iriraz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,973
    In that case,u could see a lot more surprises and i doubt it`s in the interest of the tournaments,TV,sponsorship etc if lots of top guys lose early.The longer the matches,the more it favours the better players and at the end of the day the Grand Slams are the biggest tournaments,it should be a lot tougher to win then a regular ATP event.
    I can`t imagine having a 2 week tournament,where men play best of 3 set matches with a day off in between.
     
    #4
  5. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Yes, great idea. And the women should play best of 1 set.
     
    #5
  6. mcenroefan

    mcenroefan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,527
    It definitely has its upside and downside. One thing I like about it though is the instantaneous pressure on the top players....pressure with the very first serve.

    They'll never do it but I would like a 2 of 3 system with slightly longer sets....maybe 7-8 game sets.

    I don't particulary appreciate matches in this era that turn solely upon stamina in the 5th set.

    Too radical of course but does make for interesting conversation.
     
    #6
  7. TennisDawg

    TennisDawg Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    613
    How about 2 of 3 in the early rounds. 3 of 5 from the quarters on to the final. It would make for a better final IMO, the two left standing still have some reserve to play some quality tennis instead of making it a marathon.
     
    #7
  8. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,680
    Location:
    In The City
    I would stop watching pro tennis.

    It was bad enough that best of 5 set format was removed from Masters event finals.
     
    #8
  9. Larrysümmers

    Larrysümmers Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,995
    Location:
    1313 Mockingbird Lane.
    how about no ad scoring too
     
    #9
  10. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,680
    Location:
    In The City
    I love it. Throw in playable let-cord serves and we have ourselves a brilliant revolutionary men's tennis tour.
     
    #10
  11. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    I second this idea.
     
    #11
  12. mcenroefan

    mcenroefan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,527
    Actually, it does bring up an interesting theoretical question:

    How many times would Fed, Nadal or Nole crashed out of a GS if it were 2 of 3?

    Put a better way, which of the top three would have more trouble adapting to a 2 of 3 format...which would be the best in a 2 of 3 format?
     
    #12
  13. Praetorian

    Praetorian Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,205
    I would too, AND, they pay is cut in half.
     
    #13
  14. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    last summer, a friend of mine went to see a Serena Williams match. He complained that it was over too quickly. If you cut the match into 1 set, it could be done in 15 minutes.
     
    #14
  15. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    What should be addressed is this ridiculous situation with the fifth set whereby the players have to go on and on (like Cilic had to and Isner) until they get 2 clean games - now that is stupid
     
    #15
  16. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    Well the thing to do is take a look at what happened in the three setter matches and how they compare with the the stats
     
    #16
  17. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    31,212
    Location:
    Somewhere under the weather ;)
    Are you sure he was complaining? Must have been delirious with joy that it finished so fast :) but you mistook the delirium with complaining.
     
    #17
  18. The_Order

    The_Order Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,128
    Sometimes it's best to keep stupid thoughts to yourself. I would stop watching if they did this.
     
    #18
  19. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,200
    Location:
    Toronto
    I think it would be better to lower the height of the net....and allow better flatter hitting and serves.

    Or speed up the courts like the 90's!

    Will show better skills than boring grinding.
     
    #19
  20. namelessone

    namelessone Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    9,745
    Mac is losing it, big time.

    After this and Nadal is the best volleyer I wonder what his next "revelation" will be.
     
    #20
  21. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    30,288
    Location:
    Orlando FL
    I agree, that would be ridiculous!
     
    #21
  22. Murrayfan31

    Murrayfan31 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,055
    Mac's age catching up with his ideas. He should retire from commentating.
     
    #22
  23. Hood_Man

    Hood_Man Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,324
    Location:
    Wales
    Mac would say that, he'd have won that French Open Final if it was Best of 3...
     
    #23
  24. BHiC

    BHiC Rookie

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    308
    Location:
    USA
    I disagree with the fact that we would see many more upsets. We do not see upset after upset in other tournaments that are best 2 out of 3, so I see no reason to believe that we would see it at the Grand Slams were they to change. If there were more upsets, then I still think that would help the sport. If someone with a great story has a breakthrough major, then it might attract more media attention. I think that tennis would increase in US media coverage dramatically were someone such as Brian Baker to make the finals of Wimbledon.
     
    #24
  25. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,139
    I've long felt the same way as Mac about this. Best of five gives a player too much time to potentially play badly before getting started, and the early sets just lack urgency for the fans, who are as likely to head for the food court as be in their seats for these marathons.
     
    #25
  26. papertank

    papertank Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,707
    I think it's fine the way it is. There is no reason men should play best of 3. And I'm fine with women playing best of 3 because that means we see less of them.
     
    #26
  27. Govnor

    Govnor Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,335
    The Tennis can still be plenty good in the 5th set.
     
    #27
  28. TheF1Bob

    TheF1Bob Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,473
    Location:
    NON-Pigeon City
    John McEnroe - Been talking ****e ever since he retired from the was good game of tennis.
     
    #28
  29. TennisDawg

    TennisDawg Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    613
    If we limited to 3 of 5 sets in the early rounds, the upside would be that we don't have as many boring 5 setters in the early rounds. i.e. yesterday's Sam Querry vs Cilic match. If all professional tennis matches were like that, I would stop watching Pro Tennis.
     
    #29
  30. SystemicAnomaly

    SystemicAnomaly G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    11,181
    Location:
    Stuck in the Matrix somewhere in Santa Clara CA
    Best of 3 wouldn't be a bad idea of it was first to 8 games for each set rather than 6 games. (If you want to make it it more about stamina, then go with first to 9 games/set).

    If the women want equal pay, then let them play best of 3 sets with first to 8 games per set. The women should be able to handle that.
     
    #30
  31. mistik

    mistik Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,892
    I wonder what will be Johny Macs next stupid idea.
     
    #31
  32. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,499
    But he likely would have won two more US Opens... Not a bad swap really.
     
    #32
  33. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,114
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    Both men and women should be playing best of 5 sets in the majors. These are the biggest prizes in tennis and should be the hardest to win.
     
    #33
  34. Nostradamus

    Nostradamus G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2011
    Messages:
    13,247
    Location:
    In the future
    J Mac ignorance is bliss. Tennis is about stamina not just skills. If it was just about skills, marcelo Rios would have won 10 majors.
     
    #34
  35. CRWV

    CRWV Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    261
    Location:
    Philly
    no net cord lets, leave in adv. scoring, best of three, no tiebreak!

    Imagine if guys Isner and Querrey had to learn how to construct a break of serve or play 150 games/match. :) :lol:
     
    #35
  36. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,914
    I wouldn't be surprised if best of 5 is removed from the majors in the next 10-15 years, except maybe just the finals. the writing has been on the wall for sometime, look at how many best of 5 set matches at non slam events there were in 1990. then 2000. and today.

    The slams will still be hugely popular events with best of 3 format & the tv networks(who really run the show) will be much happier with best of 3.

    and we probably wouldn't have as many matches suspended due to darkness with best of 3.

    this isn't really such a crazy idea by Mac at all(again the tv networks would love it)

    and maybe players will have longer careers(today we have so many more 30 year olds on tour compared to 10-20 years ago, maybe we'll have a bunch of 40 year olds on tour in the future with only best of 3 used)

    fyi the USO used to have best of 3 through the round of 16
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
    #36
  37. Def

    Def Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    452
    I thought that was only for doubles?
     
    #37
  38. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,114
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    That would be really horrible.

    Would they? I can't imagine how they could possibly sell the contemporary champions as better than their predecessors if they get rid of the best of 5 set format. None of this "history" stuff will wash at all.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
    #38
  39. MichaelNadal

    MichaelNadal Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    30,288
    Location:
    Orlando FL
    That would be a huge, huge controversy, and should never happen.
     
    #39
  40. big_bill

    big_bill Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    117
    Dumbest suggestion ever to come from Johnny Mac's lips. I do however agree with him that there should be 5th set tiebreakers. Tradition is great but frankly tennis matches become tedious and boring with no end in sight. Tiebreakers enhance the drama.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2012
    #40
  41. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,945
    Personally, I think it is a good idea. Best of five are often too long and boring in many cases, with some of the lesser players especially.
     
    #41
  42. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,945
    Buh bye!!!! ;)
     
    #42
  43. sundaypunch

    sundaypunch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,683
    This is exactly what the general public thinks about a 5-set match.
     
    #43
  44. big_bill

    big_bill Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    117
    The most epic moments in tennis were the result of best of five matches in slams. When did you start watching tennis?
     
    #44
  45. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,200
    Location:
    Toronto
    Not all matches are like that. Though 2012 Aussie open final, 2010 Wimbledon Isner Mahut....where like that!
     
    #45
  46. chatt_town

    chatt_town Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,005
    Yea, but then it would be a regular ole tourney. Why even call it a major? I like it the way it is. The fat@$$es and spoiled brats need to get their game together and get their fitness up to snuff. Don't penalize the players the take their game seriously. That's all changing the major would be about. Giving some random guy a chance to win a tourney he shouldn't be able to in the first place.


     
    #46
  47. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,114
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    Fifth set tiebreaks are good for the US Open, but I don't want them in the other 3 majors.
     
    #47
  48. Murrayfan31

    Murrayfan31 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,055
    At 9-9, all matches should go to a tiebreak. A super tiebreak that is. First to 10.
     
    #48
  49. roysid

    roysid Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,413
    The only reason men should do it is to protest against equal pay in slams with women but number of sets aren't equal. This would bring the ITF to its knees.

    Otherwise, 5 set classics are the great gems that would get lost. That differentiates the slams from other tourneys.

    Can you imagine a cliffhanger math..fought for 5 sets going to the end..the emotions and the feeling everyone gets is unbelievable.
    Like
    Nadal - Djokovic AO final
    Fed - Roddick W final
    Fed - Nadal W final

    And this year, Djoko-Tsonga, Fed- Del Potro in French
    Nadal - Rosol, Fed- Benettau in W.
     
    #49
  50. You Can't Be Serious

    You Can't Be Serious Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    333
    How about best three out of five tiebreakers ?
     
    #50

Share This Page