Madrid Final: Fed Played better or Nadal Played worse?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by user92626, May 18, 2009.

  1. user92626

    user92626 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,182
    First a disclosure: I honestly like both guys but perhaps Nadal a little more for his perseverance. That said I think I am fair minded.

    But did Fed really play better comparing to his recent time or Nadal play worse? I think it's the latter case. Fed played more or less with the same usual inconsistency, unreliable bh, and rarely amazing shots. But Nadal just quit retrieving a lot of ball and hit alot of easy short balls. It's usually very hard for anyone to win Nadal at the net or out-ralley him.

    Not sure what happened.
     
    #1
  2. AznHylite

    AznHylite Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    487
    Location:
    Vancouver BC
    Well, even though I'm a huge Fed fan, I would say it was both. Fed displayed great tactics in that match, but Nadal also did not look like his usual dominant self.
     
    #2
  3. DarthFed

    DarthFed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    Um..the backhand held up, the serve was on, relied on the FH in the backhands place, utilized the drop..which he never does and did pretty good at net...what match were watching..give some credit
     
    #3
  4. Guamanian G

    Guamanian G Rookie

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    170
    Location:
    all over the court
    For once in a long time Federer looked very solid. He hasnt played that well in a while. but Nadal did look a little down...
    so kinda both lol
     
    #4
  5. user92626

    user92626 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,182
    So, the consensus so far is both. I agreed Fed's got his serve and dropshots. His bh was ok. His FH didn't generate any amazing winner that I could remember. What startled me was that Nadal couldn't hit pass Fed at the net. There was that rankless guy who played the net very well -- the game where Queen Sophia also attended -- who played serve and volley all day but couldn't handle Nadal's shots. I don't think Fed's netgame was like that guy's.

    But I have to give Fed a lot of credit for keeping painting the baseline with his shots. I hardly ever see that many risky shots by any player, except Nadal. No wonder Nadal could only return short many times.
     
    #5
  6. Lsmkenpo

    Lsmkenpo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,915
    Federer's serve has returned to form, that is the difference between now and the the past year, and is the difference maker against the other top 3 players, if he can serve first and second as well as he has been, he is the best player in the world.

    Nadal doesn't like to take serves on the rise he prefers to stand further back so he can hit a shot with more topspin, now that his serve has returned to form he is able to go on the offensive right away against Nadal and dictate play, he hasn't been able to do that since Wimbledon until now.
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2009
    #6
  7. prosealster

    prosealster Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    he also moved better than i have seen him in a while...i think that also helped him to cut down on his errors
     
    #7
  8. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    To OP, it was both. Nadal wasn't 100%, he was making more errors than he normally does, but Fed had a brilliant tactic. I don't think Fed played perfectly, he still sprayed forehands etc., but it was his excellent strategy that won him the game. So a bit of both.
     
    #8
  9. Uncle Emmitt

    Uncle Emmitt Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    New Braunfels and Austin TX
    nadal wasn't moving well after djokavic 4 hr match and having to play fed the next day. In GS's usually get a day of rest before final except US Open of course. Witha day off ( like Aussie Open ) Nadal's movement was good.

    The shot Fed used that nobody is really talking about that helped him win was taking pace off inside in forehand and generating more heighth and topspin to that shot which takes it out of nadals backhand optimum hitting zone.

    I would still say the smart bet to win RG would be Rafa but an upset is a possibility
     
    #9
  10. RCizzle65

    RCizzle65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,928
    A combination of both, Federer played more solid than usual, especially against his mental block, and Nadal was a bit tired, but this isn't a big excuse because he played the longest match in AO history and still beat Federer in the finals with little rest there as well.
     
    #10
  11. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    Nadal did not play his best because Federer did not allow him to use his forehand, while Federer took advantage of Nadal's predictability, and used it against Nadal.


    Fatigue is not really an excuse when Nadal is THE fittest athlete on the tour, and it's not like he has not done something like this before.
     
    #11
  12. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    The conditions were too fast. That was a problem for why Nadal took so long to beat Djokovic. Nadal's serve wasn't good enough in this tournament to dominate and he refused to make adjustments on his return game. Way behind the baseline was a bad tactic in altitude. But I guess Nadal will never feel comfortable taking the ball early on the return.
     
    #12
  13. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916

    The AO is faster yet Nadal won there. Bad excuse.
     
    #13
  14. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Wrong. The conditions are the problem for Nadal. Fast and high bouncing is not usual conditions. Nadal was returning a lot of serves from above shoulder height here. In Australia, he was returning from a more comfortable position. Altitude is the problem and not the courts for Rafa. In particular, his return game.
     
    #14
  15. luckyguy

    luckyguy Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    186
    Both are correct.
     
    #15
  16. LurkingGod

    LurkingGod Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    300
    A bit of both, of course.
     
    #16
  17. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916


    So you're saying that Nadal sucks on clay?



    The AO takes spin well, and is faster than the clay in Madrid. I don't care what you say; conditions were not too fast nor where they so hard that Nadal could not adjust to them. Federer adjusted fine to Nadal's serve, and was able to whack it all over the place.
     
    #17
  18. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Fed steps in on his returns. The longer you wait on the return, the worse it gets in altitude. The ball doesn't drop enough from where Nadal's positioned. The kick serves were vicious in Madrid as well as the regular serve. Everyone mentioned how tough it was to return in Madrid. Regular clay is easy to return on as the ball slows down more and drops to where Nadal likes it. About chest height. Australian Open was not that high bouncing but it was pretty slow for a hardcourt.
     
    #18
  19. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Dude didn't you notice everyone struggle with ROS not ONLY Nadal? Djokovic was making so many errors off of weak Nadal serves it's not even funny.
     
    #19
  20. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    That's why I said everyone said it was tough to return serve. That is trouble as Nadal depends highly on breaking serve. His serve has been letting him down lately. I think his serve was better last year unfortunately.
     
    #20
  21. Pwned

    Pwned Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,418
    :-?:confused:

    That's like saying Nadal depends highly on winning points. The same goes for everyone. Except Karlovich.
     
    #21
  22. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,879
    Nadal was a few steps slower in this match, that made the difference, he couldn't get to the ball in time to execute as normal. And also he was slow to get to drop shots , a few steps slower than normal due to being worn out from the semi. The lower quality of shot due to Nadal being slower than ussual and tired let Fed get on the front foot and dictate more and also gave him confidence to come to net a bit, hit droppers etc.

    But the same tactics won't work in Roland Garros when Nadal is Fresh as they get an extra day rest between each match.
     
    #22

Share This Page