Discussion in 'Racquets' started by martin, May 5, 2007.
Has anyone played both of the rackets, What are the differences?
I mean the UL version of the fischer magnetic tour
Come on guys!!!
There must be someone who played both rackets???
ya i want to know to here is a bump for martin
I have played with both, the main difference for me was feel.
The Fischer is more flexible, provides a little more power on ground strokes and serves and feels more solid and stable and hits a heavier ball. I got slightly more spin from the M-Fil, but that was mainly due to the increased racquet head speed due to the lighter weight and sw.
I prefer the Fischer over the M-Fil, but if you can get the M-fil at half the price, then the Mag Tour 100 may not be worth the extra bucks.
martin...........a triple post
I've played with the m-fil300 and had a brief hit with the magnetic tour. the magnetic tour is a solid racquet, but so is the m-fil 300 I would have to have a longer hit to really tell you. they played similar if I remember correctly.
Separate names with a comma.