Marin Cilic

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by joebicko, Feb 26, 2009.

  1. joebicko

    joebicko New User

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Anyone thinks Cilic could be a top five player within a year?
     
    #1
  2. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    nope--one or two years.... lacks consistency.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2009
    #2
  3. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    I am more optimistic. Since the fifth in the top 5 is Davydenko who is declining rapidly, any good player with talent and determination can overtake this spot. Why not Marin Cilic?
     
    #3
  4. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Because #5 in the world means utter consistency--and he has not shown that yet. Does he have the talent: hell yeah! Just not consistent enough yet.

    And how can you say Davydenko is declining rapidly? That is utter nonsense!
     
    #4
  5. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Roddick has talent and determination--enough said?
     
    #5
  6. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    No he doesn't. Neither talent, nor determination. I mean big scale.
     
    #6
  7. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Big scale? What is Roddick's ranking and what is Cilic's?
     
    #7
  8. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    [And how can you say Davydenko is declining rapidly? That is utter nonsense![/QUOTE]

    Before blaming me for talking nonsence, look at his results this year, and then go to Russian Internet. It's been profusely discussed there.
     
    #8
  9. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Roddick:6
    Cilic:19

    Just in case you're curious...
     
    #9
  10. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    How many years is Roddick older than Cilic? Maybe age and ranking can be proportional?
     
    #10
  11. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Davydenko: #5
     
    #11
  12. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Gen,

    We can debate all night. Rankings are rankings. Potential is nothing--look at Donald Young.
     
    #12
  13. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    Vow! I do hope that you are not comparing Cilic to Donald Young. Good night. It's mid-morning in my part of the world.
     
    #13
  14. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Not comparing them--Cilic is much better. I said originally give him a year or two and he'll be top five. I have never said that about DY.
     
    #14
  15. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,642
    Location:
    Weak era
    There was another thread about him recently.I don't see him reaching top 5 this year but I expect him to reach top 10 by the end of 2009,we'll see if I'm right(he's 14-1 this season so far If I'm not mistaken).

    It's debatable about talent,I consider serving 220+ bombs and getting 60-70%of them in as talent,other people don't.I also personally have a hard time saying that any player who ever got to top 10(let alone top 5)doesn't have talent,that just sounds a bit ridiculous to me.

    As for Roddick's determination,it's hardly questionable.I consider him to be one of the better competitors around.He also leads the tour in BPs saved if I'm not mistaken,sure that's partly due to his serve but mental toughness is a factor as well.
     
    #15
  16. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    ^^ I will agree. I'm not a fan of Roddick--but I'll take him on my team in a scrap any day. He's a fighter and competitor and I sure appreciate seeing that in tennis. Even when he is getting thumped by the Fed--Andy fights for every point and never quits. Don't know if I have ever seen him give up or tank a match.

    He's a tough bloke.
     
    #16
  17. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    I may be wrong speaking about Roddick all the time. I don't like big servers. To me they spoil the game. Saying this I don't mean big-serving Federer, or Murray (who is not formally qualified as a big server, still his serve looks very convincing since USO-2008), Gulbis or Cilic whose serve isn't awesome yet, but quite good. Because all these guys have much more than their serves. Roddick used to have a serve and a forehand, nowadays his forehand doesn't look very inspiring.

    About the second item in bold: that's why I said "big scale".
     
    #17
  18. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    ^^Roddick won the USO and was #1 in the world--how can that not be "big scale"?

    And now you mentioned Gulbis: ranked 42.

    How can you say these guys have more talent than Roddick or Davydenko? They both have more points to defend and yet remain a constant above Cilic and Gulbis.

    Come on now, find a better argument...:)
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2009
    #18
  19. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    My big scale includes, but not limited to, Laver, Emerson, Gonzales (Pancho), Connors, MacEnroe, Borg, Wilander, Edberg, Becker, Sampras, Agassi, Kuerten (on clay), Federer, Nadal. 1-2 slam wonders like Safin, Ferrero, Roddick and Hewitt are off this list. Actually they are what I call "low competition field" in 2000-2005.
     
    #19
  20. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Dang, you have a big scale. I like your standards.
     
    #20

Share This Page