Murray's theory on No.1.

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Paul Murphy, Mar 6, 2012.

  1. Paul Murphy

    Paul Murphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,837
    From Tennis.com: Andy Murray says that what has separated the rest of the Big 4 (Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer) from him is that they haven't fallen into prolonged slumps.

    "There's an understanding now that if you want to get to No. 1 in the world you can't have a month where you're not winning matches," Murray told the Telegraph. "I did a good job last year when I got to the clay, and since then I've had a lot of good tournaments and got to the last stage of a lot of events. But that month in February-March time hurt me and also the end of the year [when he withdrew from the ATP Tour Finals and Basel because of injuries]. That's the thing that Novak did last year and Roger a few years ago and also Rafa a couple of years ago. They showed that it is possible to win every single event. You need to go in with that mindset and just try and get through matches when you're not playing that well. That's really the goal for this year, to not have those quiet months."

    I think it's a bit more than that - like winning a major or two.
     
    #1
  2. DjokovicForTheWin

    DjokovicForTheWin Banned

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,811
    When did Nadal ever show it was possible to win every single match?
     
    #2
  3. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    29,357
    Location:
    Brave New World
    Righto Muurya.

    You win everything in sight, and you'll be numero uno. As simple as that.
     
    #3
  4. pvaudio

    pvaudio Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,543
    Difference between Nadal and Federer showing that it's possible to win every title is that Federer can do it more than once. Nadal isn't exactly a master at defending non-clay titles. In fact, he never has.
     
    #4
  5. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    nothing wrong with what Murray said... fair enough

    I really think he has grown up as a player
     
    #5
  6. Joehax

    Joehax New User

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    Australia
    He definitely needs to win a couple of slams, otherwise he'll be a male version of Wozniacki
     
    #6
  7. zapvor

    zapvor Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,090
    Location:
    tennis courts
    um.......he isnt even no1
     
    #7
  8. jokinla

    jokinla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,705
    He kind of left out the main reason, THEY WIN MAJORS!!!
     
    #8
  9. The Bawss

    The Bawss Banned

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,829
    Location:
    Lyon, France.
    It really is as simple as that. There are 800 ranking points between being in the finals of a major and winning it. If you have won at least 2 majors in a year like the rest of the top 4 have (they all did 3 actually) then you are sitting on 4000 points. That means that if you play an average year (for a top 4) outside of those 2 majors, you will almost certainly be #1 at the end of the year.

    It's all about the majors.
     
    #9
  10. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    Tell that to Marcelo Rios.

    You can be no. 1 without a major, but just not in this era.
     
    #10
  11. ZeroSkid

    ZeroSkid Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Canada
    Pretty much agree with Murray
     
    #11
  12. BULLZ1LLA2.0

    BULLZ1LLA2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    363
    Just make sure you win at least ONE slam per year. That will give you a chance at the top ranking. TWO slams will almost seal it.

    I don't agree with Murray. Djokovic was useless after the US Open last year. Didn't hurt him. Actually if you win EVERYTHING, then it make it very hard to keep the number one ranking the next year. Even if you win most events, very hard, as Djokovic will find out.
     
    #12
  13. merlinpinpin

    merlinpinpin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,552
    Nope. That's just a serious misunderstanding of how the rankings work. Winning has never been a drawback to keeping the #1 spot, losing is.
     
    #13
  14. BULLZ1LLA2.0

    BULLZ1LLA2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    363
    If it were a 2 year ranking system, Nadal would still have had the number one ranking at the end of 2011. His brilliant 2010 would not have doomed him in 2011. Inability to repeat that year in 2011, would not have cost him the top ranking, if we had a 2 year ranking system. Likewise, Djokovic will be doomed this year if he doesn't repeat his 2011 results.
     
    #14
  15. merlinpinpin

    merlinpinpin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,552
    I stand by what I wrote. You obviously don't understand how rankings work if you think Nadal was "doomed" in 2011 by his 2010 season.
     
    #15
  16. BULLZ1LLA2.0

    BULLZ1LLA2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    363
    No problem there.
     
    #16
  17. pug

    pug Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    672
    Yes, we know that you hate Rafa, but can you quit trolling every thread looking for a chance to bash him. We're talkin' Murry here.
     
    #17
  18. DjokovicForTheWin

    DjokovicForTheWin Banned

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,811
    Huh??? Murray was talking about Fed, Nadal and Djoker. It was very relevant my post.
     
    #18
  19. Laurie

    Laurie Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,383
    Location:
    London
    Everything goes hand in hand, you usually can't achieve one thing without having other elements in place. So as far as I'm concerned, Murray's total inner belief is tempered by the fact that deep down he knows he has some technical deficiencies. Guys who win big a lot often do that because they have belief in their game, total belief.

    I would wonder whether Murray has total belief in his forehand to do damage, and in his 2nd serve not to be slow and short in crucial moments making him vulnerable to attack. With Murray it is not just about having quiet months, he has those issues to work on as well. He's basically playing catch up all the time from that perspective.
     
    #19
  20. TopFH

    TopFH Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,439
    If we had a two year ranking system, Nadal would have No.1 until 2010, not 2008.
     
    #20
  21. Povl Carstensen

    Povl Carstensen Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,746
    Totally, utterly wrong. The only thing that matters is how many points you score compared to the competition.
     
    #21
  22. laughingbuddha

    laughingbuddha Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    174
    Nadal now proposes the three-year system, the even year system, and the grass/clay only system.
     
    #22
  23. SLD76

    SLD76 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    9,781
    Location:
    Minneapolis, North of the Wall
    ROFL! slain dead@even year system!

    I lol'd.
     
    #23
  24. Homeboy Hotel

    Homeboy Hotel Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    London
    All you need to do is reach one slam final and you'll permanently be in the top 10 for life...

    Berdych, Wimbledon 2010...anyone?
     
    #24

Share This Page