Nadal even better than you think

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by RoddickAce, Apr 12, 2009.

  1. RoddickAce

    RoddickAce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,467
    ...says Roddick

    " "I think he kind of gets pigeon holed into what people remember from five years ago," added the 26-year-old. "

    http://www.reuters.com/article/sportsNews/idUSTRE52P6N920090326

    An interesting article, and I kind of agree with Roddick. To this day, many people label Nadal as a "pusher", or "counterpuncher" that only waits for his opponents to make unforced errors. But actually, he dictates play a lot (granted, not to the extent of Agassi, who is a model for aggressive baselining), and he often hits outrageous winners with crazy angles.

    What do you guys think, does Nadal SERIOUSLY still just wait for the error all the time, or is there some prejudice and a lasting effect of a first impression going on?

    (Btw this is not a bandwagon thread to praise Nadal, or a flaming thread to criticize people; this is just a thought on why people still consider him a counterpuncher who waits for errors despite his aggressive tennis)
     
    #1
  2. atac

    atac Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2005
    Messages:
    371
    People who call him a pusher are usually Federer fanatics.
     
    #2
  3. [d]ragon

    [d]ragon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,466
    He doesn't sit and wait for errors, he forces them. Yeah I agree that there's more to Nadal than some people believe. He really is a smart player. Doesn't always go for the winner, hitting deep topspin shots and not painting the lines all the but when he wants to, he definitely can. Also his serve is very underated.
     
    #3
  4. The Don

    The Don Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    Makati City, Manila
    Nadal is a smart player i have to say even when he is in the tightest situations he knows where to hit the ball
     
    #4
  5. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    Am I just crazy or does no one remember the days in 2003-2006 when Nadal was considered "The Next Federer"??

    Their techniques are much more similar than people think. On the ATP tour, only Nadal puts more spin on the ball than Federer.

    He has legitimate skills and his arsenal of tennis weapons are just as stacked as anyone else's, and he keeps improving his net game and serve.
     
    #5
  6. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    I don't think Nadal's a pusher. He dictates play more than people think. He's a very intelligent player, adjust on the fly real well. I'd say his adaptation skills are on par with say Murrays.
     
    #6
  7. mjv384

    mjv384 New User

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    Nadal keeps on getting better and that is why he is on the top of the game. He is so solid and stable all around. It is hard to find a weakness. He has worked his way up and has become a great player.
     
    #7
  8. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Nadal a pusher? The guy has one of the heaviest forehand in history of tennis. He can drag people all over the court with his heavy groundstrokes much like Agassi. Nadal has one of the most effective offense game tennis has ever seen. Definitely not a pusher IMO.
     
    #8
  9. jamesblakefan#1

    jamesblakefan#1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    15,761
    Location:
    VA Beach
    I think a lot of people look at Nadal differently because he is a lefty. Most people can identify with certain aspects of Federer's, Murray's, Roddick's games, simply b/c they're rightys and thats something common. But the fact that Rafa's a lefty and plays the game so much differently-with so much consistent spin, makes people want to categorize him as a pusher, which is unfair.
     
    #9
  10. vtmike

    vtmike Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,658
    Location:
    Texas
    Seriously?? Are you kidding me?? :shock: Other than imparting a lot of spin, I don't see any other similarity in their techniques!!
     
    #10
  11. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    Their respective styles are not polar opposites as some people here would have us think. I'd say that their serves (especially 2nd) are similar, as of late. Also, Nadal's approach shots are similar to Fed's approach shots circa 2006-2007. And Nadal's new slices and net game are also similar to Fed's.

    They're both baseliners, through-and-through. You can see that in the long baseline rallies, especially on clay.
     
    #11
  12. tahiti

    tahiti Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    840
    I have never thought of Nadal as a pusher. He can take on any winning ball and turn it into a winner, he can hit amazing angles and he has the best forehand in the game. People who loved Federer will always compare Nadal to him. Doesn't make Nadal any less of a player if he doesn't play the way Federer does. In fact, again, If Nadal's game has managed to to beat Federer on every surface it says enough.
     
    #12
  13. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
     
    #13
  14. vtmike

    vtmike Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,658
    Location:
    Texas
    ^^^ That was exactly how I reacted when I read his post! :)
     
    #14
  15. tata

    tata Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,065
    Without a doubt their forehand technique is different. One uses a 1hbh and the other uses 2. Nadal actually muscles a lot of his serves while federer doesnt. And i seriously doubt nadal volleys as great as federer. So how the hell are they similar at all?
     
    #15
  16. MizunoMX20

    MizunoMX20 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    152
    It's interesting to hear people's real valuation of Rafa's game, because I've heard Nadal being referred to as ''The Mallorcan Moonballer'' several times (but that could've been on the BBC forum aswell). I agree with most that's being said here. Nadal doesn't go for a winner on every shot, but plays very agressive still.
     
    #16

Share This Page