Nadal/Federer H2H is symmetrical

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by TheLoneWolf, May 22, 2010.

  1. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Wow, I just realized that their H2H to this date is absolutely symmetrical:
    By winner:
    N-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-F-N-F-N-F-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-N

    It means something...

    [​IMG]
     
    #1
  2. JuliusWinto

    JuliusWinto Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    What happens next?
     
    #2
  3. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Exactly! I'm scared. Scared I tell ya! :)
     
    #3
  4. ruerooo

    ruerooo Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,415
    Location:
    Right behind you
    You know I love me some FEDAL finals, but is there a possibility you've been watching a little too much DaVinci Code, in addition to your Close Encounters?
    :-D
     
    #4
  5. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    LOL. No. I haven't even seen DaVinci Code (or read the book.) I'm a little familiar with it though.
     
    #5
  6. Tennis_Monk

    Tennis_Monk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,481
    N-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-F-N-F-
    N-F-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-N-?

    OR

    N-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-F-
    N-F-N-F-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-N

    Not seeing the symmetry. how is it symmetrical?
     
    #6
  7. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    If you read the list that I have in the first post forwards and backwards, it is the same list.
    A symmetrical list doesn't need to have an even number of elements.
     
    #7
  8. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    It means Nadal is awesome. :)
     
    #8
  9. I agree with this human being.
     
    #9
  10. Tennis_Monk

    Tennis_Monk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,481
    There is a reason why i suck at studies .....Thanks for clarification.
     
    #10
  11. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    LOL. Everybody already knew that. There has to be another more obscure reason. I'm studying the Mayan calendar as we speak. I think it's related...
     
    #11
  12. ninman

    ninman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,898
    All the head to head tells me is that Federer didn't take his chances against Nadal when he had them. That he has a deep inferiority complex against Nadal, and it doesn't seem to make a difference if he manages to score a few wins against him. For example in Nadal's 14 wins, 13 of those matches he only required 1 match point to defeat Federer.

    Out of the 14 defeats Federer had opportunities to win at least 8 of those matches. Out of 7 defeats Nadal had opportunities to win at most 2. Federer just doesn't take his chances, that's the bottom line, and in my opinion that all started in Rome 2006.
     
    #12
  13. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,390
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    N-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-F-N-F-N-F-F-N-N-N-N-N-F-N

    The bolded bit is the centre. If you read it to the left and to the right of the centre, it is identical.
     
    #13
  14. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    No worries. I can see how you were interpreting it (having 2 discrete sides with only whole elements in each one.)
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2010
    #14
  15. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,390
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    The 2 key matches for me were the 2006 Dubai final, where Nadal faced a peak Federer blowing him off the court and yet sucked it up and found a way to win. And the other was that 2006 Rome final where Federer played as well as he could play on clay, leading 4-1 in the final set, having 2 CPs in the 12th game of that set and leading the tiebreak 5-3, only to then lose 4 points in a row and the match.
     
    #15
  16. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    lol. Some people need confirmation and now we have found it in the most fitting of places, written directly into the DNA of the H-H with his greatest rival.

    LoneWolf: I bow to my Sensei. :)
     
    #16
  17. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    Federer is gonna win French Open 2010 over Nadal if the pattern continues. But then he'll lose Wimbledon to Rafa.
     
    #17
  18. ruerooo

    ruerooo Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,415
    Location:
    Right behind you
    It means we will be able to watch Rafa and Roger play the Olympic Mens Singles Final for the gold medal before the world ends in 2012.
    According to the Mayan calendar.
     
    #18
  19. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,073
    I think the word you are looking for is palindrome. Kinda like toot, madam, or 14041.
     
    #19
  20. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Praised be thou, my Brother. The end is near! :)
     
    #20
  21. darthpwner

    darthpwner Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,039
    That match will determine who is the greater champion.
     
    #21
  22. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Ah! You got it ruerooo! Fed will serve for the match, Rafa will do a perfectly symmetrical whiff, and God will come out the clouds, say "fck this, this is just getting ridiculous" and end it right there. :)
     
    #22
  23. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    You are right, edberg505. That's the technical word. Thanks!
     
    #23
  24. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,697
    Or "eye did peep did eye" and "lived a tune, rare nut, a devil"
     
    #24
  25. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    It might signify that there will be no more Fedal final or matches. :shock:
     
    #25
  26. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,551
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Jolly good - great find, wolfie.
     
    #26
  27. ruerooo

    ruerooo Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,415
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Hush your mouth!
    :evil: :evil: :evil:
     
    #27
  28. ruerooo

    ruerooo Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,415
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Sounds like Gaiman and Pratchett's Good Omens. :)
     
    #28
  29. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    I was just saying. It's quite unlikely that such remarkable symmetry will repeat itself again. I am a big fan of Fedal matches and finals. Of course I don't want it to come to an end.
     
    #29
  30. pudelko

    pudelko Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    Location:
    London Ontario, Canada
    The pattern will restart.

    Which means Nadal will win.
     
    #30
  31. OKUSA

    OKUSA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,236
    Location:
    TN
    there is no pattern
     
    #31
  32. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Wow

    ^^ Look at me! I just did one! HEHEHEHEHEHE!
     
    #32
  33. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I hope not, Dimension! :wink:
    I intend to keep watching Rafa beating Fed 2 out of 3 times up to 2012 and beyond. :)
     
    #33
  34. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    Same here. Actually if the pattern is to repeat again, I hope Nadal's next loss to Fed will be at the hard court masters, not at any of the slams. :wink:
     
    #34
  35. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Thank you, CyBorg. At first I thought I was wrong, but then I double checked just to make sure. Really weird. The chances of having a 21 item palindrome I don't think are very high.

    As a matter of fact, the chances can be calculated this way:
    1. Eliminate the middle element, as it is irrelevant.
    2. Pair the first and last element of the resulting sequence (we have 10 such pairs.) For each pair, we have 4 possible states: N-N, N-F, F-N, and F-F. Only 2 out of the 4 states allow the palindrome to exist.
    3. Based on 2., the chances of having a 21 element palindrome are (1/2)^10.
    Do you know how low that number is? It's 1/1024, or 0.09765625%. Very, very unlikely.

    If anyone thinks I made a mistake in the above calculation, please let me know.

    So yeah, it's very weird to have this configuration in the H2H of Rafa and Fed.
     
    #35
  36. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I'll sign for that! :)
     
    #36
  37. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I'll have to google that one. Is it a book? :)
     
    #37
  38. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    You will have to sign with the angel, not the devil. :)
     
    #38
  39. RCizzle65

    RCizzle65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,932
    O_O That's mindblowing, what made you figure that out? lol
     
    #39
  40. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I will. :wink:
     
    #40
  41. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    Thelonewolf has some amazing insight there. You got to give him that. :)
     
    #41
  42. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I took Math in college. And I actually enjoyed it. (Yeah, I'm THAT weird. :) )
     
    #42
  43. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,879
    Location:
    South
    It's easy to be symmetric when you are one dimentional:

    [​IMG]
     
    #43
  44. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    @TheLoneWolf, you deserve my 5 star medal for figuring this out. :)
     
    #44
  45. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    Boo. LOL. Actually that's a good comeback. But notice that it takes 2 to tango (or to H2H in this case.) So Fed is a part of the equation.
     
    #45
  46. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I wouldn't exchange the Nobel Prize for that, Dimension. :wink:
     
    #46
  47. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,879
    Location:
    South
    Well, he can make some others asymmetric when he is part of the equation:


    [​IMG]
     
    #47
  48. Dimension

    Dimension Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Interdimensional plane
    One can only dream. :wink:. It's unrealistic for anyone with a strong passion for research to have that as a goal. It would be more appropriate to view that as a bonus or a lottery win. :)

    There is no Nobel prize in math. However, there is Field's medal which comes every 4 years. With the caliber of talent that you possess, you might attain it one day? :)
     
    #48
  49. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    ^^ How can that
    be married to this?:
    [​IMG]
    I used to think Fed had sold his soul to the Devil, but Roddick and Stepanek have proven everyone wrong. :)
     
    #49
  50. TheLoneWolf

    TheLoneWolf Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384
    Location:
    Airstrip One
    I know what you mean, Dimension. I don't think anyone looks at prizes and recognition as goals. You have to have a passion for what you do, and your achievements stem from that passion alone.

    Thanks for your kind comments. I'm afraid the Field's medal is reserved for true geniuses. I'm nothing but a goon compared to the real smart mathematicians. :)
     
    #50

Share This Page