Nadal has played 47 more best-of-3 set matches than Federer since 2007

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by JennyS, Apr 6, 2010.

  1. JennyS

    JennyS Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,294
    I was curious to see just how many more matches Nadal played in the best of three set tournaments. In many ways, they are more grueling and tougher on the body than Slams since matches are often played 4-5 days in a row. Maybe that's why Nadal's been so beat up in recent years: so many times he's played 4-5 matches in a span of 4-6 days.

    Total matches played in best of 3 set tournaments: January 2007-present:
    Nadal: 200
    Federer: 153
    (47 more for Nadal)

    total finals made, best of 3 set tournaments
    Nadal: 23
    Federer: 16
    (7 more for Nadal)

    total semis made, best of 3 set tournaments:
    Nadal: 34
    Federer: 24
    (10 more for Nadal)
     
    #1
  2. slicefox

    slicefox Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,275
    Location:
    the hood
    wow, seems like roger has been hating on small tournaments for a while now...
     
    #2
  3. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,545
    yeah.. it is well known that fed doesn't play 90+ matches a year (and win 85+ of them) after he turned 26 years old. Not news.
     
    #3
  4. coloskier

    coloskier Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,543
    Maybe that is why Fed has been relatively healthy and Nadal has been injury prone,
     
    #4
  5. Sephiroth619

    Sephiroth619 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    377
    Location:
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Go big or go, I mean stay, home.
     
    #5
  6. Semi-Pro

    Semi-Pro Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,199
    Location:
    Toronto
    Yes, but Nadal is 23 and should be in his prime and should be able to play 90+ matches a year.
     
    #6
  7. Nextman916

    Nextman916 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,122
    result=obvious
     
    #7
  8. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    And since then Roger has been slowing down, winning 7 more majors in the last 13. While Rafa has been peaking since, getting injured all the time. It's obvious what Fed's agenda is.
     
    #8
  9. MichaelChang

    MichaelChang Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,253
    When Nadal gets to 26 years old, if he is still playing the tour, he probably will do the same as Federer did. You can not compare the 2 when they are 5 years apart.
     
    #9
  10. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,232
    Good job Jenny.:)
    The difference is Roger had better results at the GS. And since GS rewards much more points than 3 set matches, Rafa has to work hard to catch up with Roger. In order for Rafa to overtake Roger’s ranked #1 in 2008, he had to played well at the GS, not just the 3 set tourney alone. For Rafa to get 46 weeks at #1, that’s include a MUST winning atleast 2 GS in a span of 12 months. A testament of how difficult it is to be #1 in this era, unlike previous generations where slamless players have a shot at #1. Roger doesn’t give #1 away that easy(despite mono in early 2008 that slowed him down), players has to earn it!
     
    #10
  11. stapler

    stapler Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    846
    If Nadal ever thought this was possible while playing his style of game, then he is deluding himself.
     
    #11
  12. valiant

    valiant Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,462
    Location:
    New Delhi
    IF Nadal has his way he would play all year. The kid loved to play you know.
     
    #12

Share This Page