Nadal is the fastest tennis player ever.

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by terribleIVAN, Sep 15, 2013.

  1. Tenez101

    Tenez101 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,638
    #51
  2. The_Order

    The_Order Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,045
    What? But wasn't he the guy who beat Federer at Wimbledon?
     
    #52
  3. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    I remember Blake being pretty fast in his prime. When you know, he made shots over the net/not outside the court.
     
    #53
  4. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,128
    I think that this is the important point. I'm sure there are guys purely faster than Nadal, but no one can or has hit the explosive shots on the run that Nadal could hit.
     
    #54
  5. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,640
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Nadal and Borg are two of the fastest players ever. Nadal does hit great on the run, as did Borg with his passing shots. Of course, these modern frames and strings on slower surfaces is very conducive to great counter punching. Nadal does hit great shots on the run, but so does Djokovic. I feel like Djokovic is about as fast as Nadal now (not younger Nadal), but Nadal is still a bit quicker. Nadal maintains his speed well during long matches.
     
    #55
  6. Lautrec

    Lautrec New User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2013
    Messages:
    62
    While early Nadal's speed truly was exceptional, I have a feeling much of his perceived speed post-injuries has to do with his needing less preparation than others. His superior upper body physique and short backswing enables him to hit his powerful whipping forehand from pressured positions where others might have to slice it, making him seem faster than he really is.

    Any truth to this?
     
    #56
  7. dknotty

    dknotty Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    675
    Apparently he can cover 10m per second. Not sure how long he can sustain that but its not far off Usain Bolt's 100m record!
     
    #57
  8. Tennisean

    Tennisean Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    218
    And his larger than average physique doesn't help a bit.

    The 'main reason for his success' is his great athleticism & good build.
     
    #58
  9. Tennisean

    Tennisean Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    218
    Just enough to win 2 Slams and be #1 this year. (LLOLOLOLLLLOOL)
     
    #59
  10. vernonbc

    vernonbc Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,859
    I think his anticipation and court sense and tennis iq are highly underrated and account for much of his court coverage - along with his above average speed of course.
     
    #60
  11. dman72

    dman72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,997
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    In terms of pure court coverage Monfils is faster than anyone..I've seen him get to drop shots that no other player on the planet can get to....he's just not nearly as good a tennis player as Djokovic or Nadal...or anyone in the top 10.

    Nadal's greatness comes from getting to balls and actually doing offensive things with them where other people just pop them back or squash shot them.
     
    #61
  12. terribleIVAN

    terribleIVAN Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    648
    And i have seen Rafa play and beat Monfils by just imposing his physicality on him; the first set was equal, then Monfils couldn't sustain his effort anymore, while Rafa still covers his side of the court just the same like the proverbial energised bunny.

    Monfils is just one of these multitude of players who doesn't have the physique to match his style of game.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2013
    #62
  13. granddog29

    granddog29 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    Messages:
    834
    Moving forward maybe but his side to side movement is far from the best. It is good but nowhere near as good as Nadal or Djokovic, or several others, and that is where most of the movement in tennis is, especialy for a baseliner.
     
    #63
  14. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,681
    Location:
    In The City
    Monfils also looks like a clumsy oaf covering the court compared to Nadal. I remember seeing Monfils play Federer and he was using strained and awkward movements to change directions and keep up with Federer. Nadal, on the other hand, shrinks the court a lot more effectively and he can accomplish this without all the goofy slips and slides that Monfils has to employ.
     
    #64
  15. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,708
    No one will ever be as graceful and effortless as Roger while still having tremendous speed, anticipation and footwork. On this there can be absolutely no debate whatsoever otherwise you are insane.

    Who has the actual fastest speed? In tennis its all about sprints and changing direction. I'm sure this has been measured over the course of a few matches and all the top suspects should be pretty close. Its not like any one of them is that much faster.
     
    #65
  16. Le Master

    Le Master Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2013
    Messages:
    425
    Have you seen this match on clay versus Coria in 2004? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUnCOhMV-1U
    He's like a bullet.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2013
    #66
  17. Tenez101

    Tenez101 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,638
    This is Nadal on clay. It's a whole other freaking level from current ******* on grass. :)
     
    #67
  18. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,544
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I doubt it.
     
    #68

Share This Page