Don't get me wrong. I think Nadal is an outstanding player. But I think he is overrated. Unlike many, I don't believe he is a great. He is just an outstanding player. At least for now. Why do all the Nadal fanatics tout him a great? Well, they say, Nadal has a leading h2h against possibly THE GOAT, Roger Federer. Okay, you have all heard this crap a million times now. But if you agree with me and think Nadal is not a great, and is simply an outstanding player, how come he has a leading h2h record against GOAT candidate Federer? Well, some people say Nadal hits the ball in such a way as to keep Federer from dictating the points. I believe however, this is wrong. I think, like a lot of you may think, that Nadal only has a leading h2h against Federer because Federer doesn't do the right things. All Nadal does is get the ball over the net and create that uncertainty in Federer's mind. But that's fine. That's enough to beat him. But for that alone, I don't think Nadal should be called a great. For now he should just be an outstanding player. What do you think?