Nadal should have played in Wimbledon

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by henryshli, Jun 22, 2009.

  1. henryshli

    henryshli Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    733
    He doesn't say in any of the interviews that he is still injured. He just says that he doesn't think he is ready for the tournament.

    Fear of losing isn't a good enough excuse for not defending a slam title.
     
    #1
  2. veritech

    veritech Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,002
    Location:
    california
    after watching all the interviews from the past and acknowledging all his opinions about the tournament, it's safe to conclude that he wouldn't miss this tournament, unless of course there is something more important to deal with, and in this case, that's his fitness. he has said that his fitness isn't 100% and he should take some time off to recuperate and rest.

    is his absence from wimbledon mental? possibly, maybe a little. but what they are focusing on are his knees and tendinitis.

    and come on, this is rafael nadal, one of the mentally strongest players on the tour. it sounds absurd that he would miss his said favorite tournament because of a couple losses, including one at RG. people have bounced back from much tougher losses.
     
    #2
  3. The-Fed-Express

    The-Fed-Express New User

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    Ireland
    As a Federer fan, I have to say that's rubbish. Nadal has obviosuly struggled with his knees for a while now and if he feels he hasn't prepared enough to mount a serious challenge at Wimbledon (whether injured or not), he has every right to pull out.

    If there is still any doubt about his knees, a long, strenous grnad-slam tournament could eman the end of his career. Imo, he has made the right decision.
     
    #3
  4. esm

    esm Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    517
    Location:
    London
    you have no idea what you are talking about... no?

    i think it is quite clear that his knees were still bothering him last friday after the exhibition match (and the other match losing to Hewitt on thursday). no match play after FO loss would mean he is not ready to play at SW19

    i think he is smart to nurse the knees and get better for his future career. the wimbledon championship will still be there in 2010.

    agreed. well said!:)
     
    #4
  5. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,778
    I noticed that too - Nadal's excuse was he could not give his best. But attendance at Slams is mandatory unless there is an injury. I don't see why being 95% would be a valid excuse.
     
    #5
  6. Tennis_Bum

    Tennis_Bum Professional

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    997
    Fair statement.
     
    #6
  7. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    No. It would have been stupid for him to play W.
     
    #7
  8. DarthFed

    DarthFed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    It's his favorite tournament i believe, the one he's wanted to win since he was a kid..if he missed the chance to win it again then this is serious business
     
    #8
  9. FedererForehand

    FedererForehand Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    714
    Just because he didn't actually say he was injured doesn't mean he's not. Give me a break- they guy is a warrior and was bound to start breaking down at some point with is rediculous schedule.

    If he was healthy he would have destroyed Hewitt in the exo last week.
     
    #9
  10. Turning Pro

    Turning Pro Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,430
    95%? 95% would have won him the French.
     
    #10
  11. slicefox

    slicefox Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,275
    Location:
    the hood
    what's with this BS about "ah, 50% nadal will pwn anyone in the world"

    if he is not '100%' doesn't mean he can't play. he's just shocked about the FO, with all the hype buildup crashed on his face.

    he doesn't want to risk another early-round exit or he'll go into depression.

    i'm kind of mad he's not playing, makes wimby 09 trash
     
    #11
  12. henryshli

    henryshli Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    733

    If his knee was bothering him that much after the Hewitt match then it would have been VERY stupid to play the exihbition match against Wawrinka...no?

    The reason he played the second match was to see where his game was. If he had beat Stan 6:0 6:0 he would have played Wimbledon...no?

    So his reason for not defending his title was because he doesn't think he could win not because he is still injured. He should have at least played in the first round.
     
    #12
  13. Blue Drop

    Blue Drop Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    323
    It's really too bad he's out. But whatever the reason, I'm certain it's not mental.

    Rafa is the toughest, mentally, on the entire tour.
     
    #13
  14. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    I don't believe the whole "injury" story at all. Sure he has been playing hurt for nearly 4 years, but then after FO he says he is "injured", then proceeds to play hewitt, then wawrinka, and somehow can't manage to show his face at Wimbledon as the defending champion because of "injury"??? :roll: Then says he will be back in 3 weeks>>> conveniently after Wimbledon.

    Whatever is going on with him in regards to skipping Wimbledon,,,, he has little control over it, and it sure as heck ain't no injury or mental fatigue.
     
    #14
  15. TheTruth

    TheTruth G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,671
    Nadal made the right decision. He's young and has plenty more Wimbledons to play.

    Anyway, he's not playing so why not enjoy Wimbledon if you're a tennis fan.
     
    #15
  16. tahiti

    tahiti Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    840
    Not playing Wimbledon cost him quite a few bucks and points. I don't think he took that decision lightly.

    If you think Nadal didn't play coz he's afraid of losing then you don't know Nadal. Fear is not a factor with him when it comes to playing.

    However fear of further damaging an injury and getting used to new matters at home are a perfect legitimate excuse not to play.
     
    #16
  17. dsa202

    dsa202 Banned

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    341
    Location:
    Long Island
    I hope they have to amputate Nadal's legs.
     
    #17
  18. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,220
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    Hell come back once his system is clean.
     
    #18
  19. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,778
    He is having family issues and some knee pain and is upset over his loss.

    But don't know if all this classifies as a good enough injury clause to skip a mandatory Slam.

    It could be he is convincing himself that his knee is worse than it is due to the other two reasons (like Fed about mono and back pain when he was losing).
     
    #19
  20. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    I fully agree.
     
    #20
  21. imjimmy

    imjimmy New User

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    73
    You should be ashamed of yourself. People don't wish that even for their enemies.
     
    #21
  22. theduh

    theduh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    Middle earth
    Clean??? I don't understand this, kindly explain.
     
    #22
  23. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,778
    What are you guys refering to?
     
    #23
  24. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,220
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    He pulled out of 2 events that he was defending champion in that are under ITF rule to play 2 exhibition matches not under ITF rule to test his knees out???????

    He could have played either queens or wimbledon to test his knees and just gone in knowing he wouldnt win but at least possibly picked up some points.

    Kinda fishy if you ask me.
     
    #24
  25. amx13

    amx13 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    509
    I think it makes sense. Why anybody would "test" and injury on a formal match or tournament?. If he wanted to see how his kness would hold up for a 2 week tournamet, any exhibition match would be the perfect chance for it. I guess he felt it was too much of a risk (early exit and worsening the injury) to go all out on wimby after those 2 exhibition matches.
     
    #25
  26. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    yep pretty obvious to non-trolls. He just did too much damage in the clay court season. As he says below he arrived at an important part of the year feeling his worst.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ed-to-pull-out-as-injury-strikes-1710909.html

    I thought he would play and get to the middle of the tournament, like in the 2007 u.s. open, but given the injury + the risk for further injury I guess it was just not worth it.
     
    #26

Share This Page