Nadal USO 07 champ

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by downthewall, Jul 10, 2007.

  1. downthewall

    downthewall Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    227
    I believe he will win this year. What do you guys think?
     
    #1
  2. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    I don't know if he can do it. It would be nice. But you're going to get polarizing answers in here u know. It'll be either "no chance in hell" or "start engraving his name on the trophy". So get ready. The avalanche is coming.
     
    #2
  3. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371

    At least you didn't call Laver a 5.0 player again...
     
    #3
  4. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    He is the number 2 player in the world>>>> so yes, he has a very good shot at winning it. Do I think he will win it?? No. Fed is going to win it again.
     
    #4
  5. herosol

    herosol Professional

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,184
    i won't say any definite but chances are high, and every thing is probably going his way.

    Wimbledon was just a slight set back.
     
    #5
  6. Richie Rich

    Richie Rich Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,271
    a lot depends on his draw. keep away from the guys who seem to have his number on hard courts (blake, youzhny) and he has a great shot. he seems to be in fed's head so if they meet in the finals it's 50:50. how's that for being squarely on the fence :smile:
     
    #6
  7. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,118
    The problem with the U.S Open is that the speed is still the fast.Its a fast surface.Nadal cant use the tactic of staying way behind the baseline and the bounces are low.Remember that he uses a western grip.
     
    #7
  8. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,118
    I dont know if its 50-50.I would say 60-40 Fed.
     
    #8
  9. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427

    What happened to your Wimbledon prediction that Nadal would win it?

    I know you lost to Oscar in FO betting, but is it the arrangement that u have to say Nadal win Wimby? lol..
     
    #9
  10. Breakaz54z

    Breakaz54z Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Ibaraki, Japan
    It'd be nice to see him win. Maybe if he does, I should quit college and train 14 hours a day for four years to turn pro for a good 8 or so years :p
     
    #10
  11. downthewall

    downthewall Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    227
    Nadal came alot closer this year in wim. Next year he will take it... with a lot of fighting
     
    #11
  12. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,118
    I have no doubt he can take it if it stays slow and it continues to get alot of crazy bounces.Maybe players will complain and they will speed it up.
     
    #12
  13. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    LOL. Not at all.

    I just looked at the facts. Coming into Wimbledon, Nadal was hands down playing the best tennis of any pro, and being the grass there is much slower, I didn't see any reason for him not to be able to pull it off. He came damn close, and gave us one hell of a final. It is the best match I have seen all year.
     
    #13
  14. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    I think this years US Open final will be Federer vs Nadal with Federer prevailing. Some have said that the US Open plays faster then Wimbledon.
     
    #14
  15. phat

    phat Rookie

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    296
    I think the conditions will not be in his favor. Everyone knows that the USO is set up for the American's to excel in. So the court & ball will be fast. He will face those flat shots that he hates hitting to his forehand alot more frequent than in Wimbledon & his groundie will not bounce as high so it will not be as lethal to his opponent........
     
    #15
  16. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,118
    Heck, the australian open will play faster soon, looks like wimbledon might be the 4th fastest slam,lol.The french open might surpass it.
     
    #16
  17. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,526
    Nadal has still not proven to be consistent on the hardcourts yet.
     
    #17
  18. J-man

    J-man Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,053
    Nadal at the US Open is an intersting prospect. He hasn't done bad there but he hasn't done great. Losing Youzhny last year. I think he has a good chance to make it to the semi's. But to get pass Federer will be very difficult. Espically Federer on the very fast surface of the us open. Us open surface is almost or even faster that Wimbledon.

    But he pushed Federer at Wimbledon. Nadal will have to be very aggrisive. He showed that he can take a short back swing and be aggrisive off the return at Wimby. It will be difficult to play defensive behind the baseline at the Open. He can kind of get away with at Wimbledon. But Youzhny again was able to pick at that, before getting injuried during the match. But he could have very well upset Nadal.
     
    #18
  19. fishuuuuu

    fishuuuuu Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,769
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    He's got a good chance, but gotta watch out for the usual suspects including Blake and Berdych.
     
    #19
  20. Grimjack

    Grimjack Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    LOL. Sounds like the same idiocy we had to deal with when nitwits were declaring "Karlovic ought to be seeded at Wimbledon!!!!111"

    One need only look at Nadal's US Open history to realize he's zero threat to ever take that title. A semifinal appearance would be an accomplishment worthy of the history books. Guy isn't a top 20 fast-hardcourt player. He's a slowcourt specialist, who is lucky that he lives in an era when two of the four slams are legit slowcourts.
     
    #20
  21. iamke55

    iamke55 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,084
    Aren't you one of the guys who's supposed to say "start engraving his name on the trophy"?
     
    #21
  22. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    Wimbledon next year will be played on mud.
     
    #22
  23. gugarafa

    gugarafa Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    271
    Location:
    the land of freedom
    Well looking at his history at Wimby....everyone said he had an easy draw last year,was pushed too hard by kendrick blablablahh etc so he wasnt good enough....fast forward this year: he came close to winning!!

    Point is the kid's getting better and improving his skills on other surfaces...he can win the USO.
     
    #23
  24. robin7

    robin7 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,155
    I think Nadal can go further this year. A SF will be satisfactory, a F is good & lifting the trophy will be great!!

    What he needs to do now is to stay fit & keep on improving his serve. There is a chance tough.
     
    #24
  25. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,494
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    Well he'll have to have made a huge improvement because last year from this point on he lost to Berdych (twice), Ferrero, Youzhny, Johansson (Joachim), and Federer on hardcourt - six loses in six tournaments, no final apperarances. at least he doesn't have many points to defend.
     
    #25
  26. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,494
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    He also came pretty close to losing. He lost 5 sets during Wimbledon '06, but this year at Wimbledon he lost 8 sets.
    I think that in some ways they both got lucky this year (Rafa and Fed). Rafa was going down to Youzhny, no question - I watched the match, and then Youzhny had the vertabrae in his back click out of place, and then Djoko came in strong in the semis but, hey, we know he had no gas. Fed got lucky with the rain breaks and Haas pulling out, and also the final was anyones.
     
    #26
  27. illkhiboy

    illkhiboy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,968
    Location:
    Karachi
    Wimbledon is not a "slow court." Deal with it junior.
     
    #27
  28. akv89

    akv89 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,587
    His chances are better than last year but I really doubt if he'll even come close to doing it. The hard courts at flushing meadows are currently the worst kind of surface for Rafa. If there is one grand slam Nadal will never win with the current surfaces, it will be USO.
     
    #28
  29. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    Um....no. That's Simon Cowell's job. Apparently you don't read my posts. Unless it's the French Open, but then we all knew that part. I'm not going out on a limb with that one. I never said Nadal was going to win the US Open. Unless he shows the form of Indian Wells I'm not going to say he'll win it before the tournament even starts. I actually post pretty objectively, I just get into arguments with Fedtrolls. Most of the time they just end up throwing insults because they can't get into a normal and objective discussion. The mod gods are certainly not in any hurry to punish them. Hmm, I wonder why? :roll:
     
    #29
  30. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I think a semifinal this year would be a success. A final would be incredible, win or lose, and you know either way he will give 110% and give the fans their moneys worth in a final. If he improves on his best ever there I think it is good to see though, for his fans and for him. It might be the hardest slam right now for him due to the court speed. So expectations might be more in check there then elsewhere, but I think a best ever result is still the realistic target.
     
    #30
  31. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    25 aces in the final troll.
     
    #31
  32. Messarger

    Messarger Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,828
    Lets not forget that he's been playing well during the start of the year at these hard court events. Winner at IW and quarters at Miami. He's shown that he can adapt if he wants to, but he needs to practice his return of serve and play more aggresively. His serving on the hard courts are very good compared to last year. Theres a chance.
     
    #32
  33. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    Of course he will win it.That's it if Federer is out with injury and he has to play only clay courters in his draw.
     
    #33
  34. ktownva

    ktownva Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    521
    Location:
    U. S. and A.
    These comments sound a bit dated. Nadal is twice the player he was last year.
     
    #34
  35. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    I don't think Nadal will get past USO semi this year. Not because he can't play well but because hard courts take the worst toll on his body. He will probably be in similar situation as Djokovic was at this Wimbledon. Have a superhuman effort to get to the semi (maybe beat Blake in 5 sets in the quarters) and then lose in 4 or 5 sets in the semi because he is too tired/injured to play.

    Similar to what happened to Nadal at AO this year. He beat Murray in 5 sets and then was tired/injured for his match against Gonzalez.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2007
    #35
  36. veritech

    veritech Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,002
    Location:
    california
    i wouldn't count him out too fast. he's always a contender.

    what final do you speak of? surely not wimbledon.
     
    #36
  37. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    He means there was a total of 25 aces in the final featuring two best returners in the game. Which shows that surface was quick enough.

    I still think bounces were too high for grass.
     
    #37
  38. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    I would love to see Nadal play Hewitt and Roddick at USO. Fed beat those two so many times it is no fun anymore.
     
    #38
  39. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    I'm expecting following players becoming more considerable factor
    in coming US Open:

    Djokovic, Gasquet, Murray, Berdych (and maybe Baghdatis, Monfils).

    Especially I'm really looking forward Gasquet finally break thru..
     
    #39
  40. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    Also note that it's more learning the bounce and movement on the surfaces
    than the speed( which tends to be very similar on all surfaces these days ).
     
    #40
  41. Mr. Sean

    Mr. Sean Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Messages:
    375
    if he plays anything like he did at indian wells. Id say he has a very good chance at reaching the final. Its crazy how the us open is now the fastest surface since wimbledon is now a faster clay surface. If nadal can adjust to this fast surface which im sure he will since hes way better than last year, he will take on federer. Lets not forget djokovic and murray who will probably meet nadal in the semis or quarters.
     
    #41
  42. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    There is no real "fast" court since 2003. It's all medium speed, so to speak.

    It's now matter of gaining experiences on its bounce and movements on it.
     
    #42
  43. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    U.S Open is a fast court, definitely faster then Wimbledon at this point in time. Australian Open is becoming a fast court now that they are speeding it up.
     
    #43
  44. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Gasquet finally break though? He just made the semis of Wimbledon.

    Berdych is way overrated and wont be a contender at the U.S Open. Djokovic, Gasquet, and Murray could be, but the only of them with an outside shot to beat Federer or Nadal right now is Djokovic.
     
    #44
  45. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    I agree. No way Fed would've gotten 24 aces on clay. Hell, Roddick wouldn't even have made the QF to choke against Gasquet if it were slow. Let's face it kids, Nadal is the real dealio and it burns you haters to see that. Nadal was hugging the baseline and blasting winners off both sides against Fed. The serve was what bailed Fed out in this match, on clay it would have been taken out of the equation. Grass, green clay. Blah! Don't think so.
     
    #45
  46. SideSpinPDR

    SideSpinPDR New User

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    Columbus, Ga
    I just hope he improves on last years effort. He definitely is improving and will put up a fight in every match he plays. I wish him luck.
     
    #46
  47. fgzhu88

    fgzhu88 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    545
    nope, US open too fast. unless they pull a 'wimby' on the hard courts...
     
    #47
  48. Heavy Metal Tennis Star

    Heavy Metal Tennis Star Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,162
    Location:
    U.S. And A.
    either federer or nadal, thats it.
     
    #48
  49. fgzhu88

    fgzhu88 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    545
    Berdych overrated??! this surface is the best for his style! he only lost last year's uso since he had to face blake, who by the way will do good this year too.
     
    #49
  50. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    James Blake has made only 2 slam quarters in his career, which has been a full fledged pro career of over 7 years now. To attribute Berdych's failure to go further then the 4th round of last years U.S Open on having to play a guy in his late 20s with only 2 slam quarters in the 4th round is desperate. Blake is one of the easiest and best draws you could have for the 4th round of a slam based on his own career success. Berdych has one slam quarter in his career, and he was killed by Nadal in that match, even though there was all this hype that Berdych was going to take Nadal out before the match, another example of his being overrated.

    He has not accomplished that much at all, even for still being fairly young. Only one slam quarterfinal, a bunch of round of 16 losses in slams. One Masters title in tainted circumstances in the very depleted Paris event of 2005. When people talk about how good he is they bring up trivial things like his win over Federer in the Olympics, as if anyone really believes players care about the Olympics, especialy the men. Berdych is a big level down from Djokovic and Gasquet, and possibly Murray and Baghdatis too.

    As for Blake, 4th round tops this year, probably loses sooner. His 15 minutes are over.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2007
    #50

Share This Page