Negatives about the Asian K-Factor Tour 90

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by AlpineCadet, Aug 13, 2007.

  1. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    Was it really an upgrade, or was it just a lost cause? There have been a lot of mixed reviews of the Wilson Asian K90's. For users of the US k90 who thought that the racket was too heavy for them, the Asian k90 version seemed to be a good alternative, yet there have recently been a lot of members on TW who have strayed from the asian k90, or are listing them for sale in the For Sale section on these boards.

    I am left wondering what they didn't like about their frames, and what they ended up switching to. Also, have there been any members who have switched back to their US k-factor 90 's? The Asian version seemed to be an upgrade to the US spec version, but the flex rating was a lot lower than the US specs (68 vs 64) thus furthering the differences between the two rackets.

    I have personally hit with the Asian k90, and felt that it was too underpowered compared to the already underpowered US k90, but am left wondering if anyone else has further insight/details. This thread exists to provide both positive/negative feedback on the Asian K-Factor Tour 90, if anyone is interested in reading up on this stick before making a purchase. ;)
     
    #1
  2. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Neither. It is a racquet that was produced for a different market.
     
    #2
  3. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    That's true in some instances I guess, but some users looked to it as an alternative for the (heavier) US spec version, so it is also correct to say it's in the "same" market.
     
    #3
  4. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,426
    Here you go (originally posted on 8/3/07 in another thread):


    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1636186&postcount=21

    Another one (originally posted on 8/1/07):

    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1632059&postcount=12

    For people that can handle the weight of the US K90, I would say definitely go for the US K90. But for people that cannot, the Asian K90 is a good alternative.

    As has been said here many times before - "You should use the heaviest racquet you can swing comfortably and without slowing down your swingspeed for as long as your hitting sessions lasts playing against someone better than you." I think that's a good guideline.

    Originally posted on 7/10/07:

    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1582167&postcount=2
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 13, 2007
    #4
  5. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    In the same instance/thread, someone else has said:

    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1582766&postcount=7
     
    #5
  6. SFrazeur

    SFrazeur Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,480
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Breakpoint, I believe Alpine asked for users to contribute the negative aspects of the Asian K90, not glowing reviews. Please keep on topic as much as possible.

    -SF
     
    #6
  7. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,426
    OK, but I think that would make for a very quiet thread. ;)

    BTW, AC is actually looking for BOTH positive AND negative feedback, if you re-read his OP above:

     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2007
    #7
  8. SFrazeur

    SFrazeur Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,480
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Quite is bliss, Breakpoint. Zeal can be a bit nosy at times.

    Edit: True I am aware, but everything in moderation.

    -SF
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2007
    #8
  9. FedUp

    FedUp Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    268
    I love my AK90. I had a difficult time wielding the USk90 but I loved the control. I figured that the lighter racquet would suit me fine. I does the job extremely well.
     
    #9
  10. AJK1

    AJK1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219
    Buying an Asian K90 is like drinking light beer, what's the point?
    Full strength or nothing!
    Go hard or go home!
     
    #10
  11. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,426
    Tastes great, less filling. ;) LOL
     
    #11
  12. Orly_Yarly

    Orly_Yarly Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    AH bridge
    what racquet do you use then, real man? dont tell us you use anything lighter than 'full strength' 12.5 oz lol.
     
    #12
  13. AJK1

    AJK1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219
    I'm too big and strong to use a "light version" of a K90.
    If i bought one i would use the real thing.
    We only sell the "man size versions" in Australia.
     
    #13
  14. aznspongehead

    aznspongehead Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    310
    Location:
    Southern CA
    My racket is 10 pounds. You won't believe the plow through.
     
    #14
  15. Orly_Yarly

    Orly_Yarly Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    AH bridge
    translation - you are NOT using the real man racquet

    what THEY SELL has nothing to do with YOU :D

    thanks for the clarification lol
     
    #15
  16. nickb

    nickb Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,292
    If it is a K90 that could well be true with Wilson's quality control :D
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2007
    #16
  17. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,426
    The "light version" of the K90 is still 12 oz., which is still heavier than the majority of racquets on the market.
     
    #17
  18. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    But is it a stable racket with enough power? I am about to demo an ak90 later this week. I will update everyone with my opinions of the racket compared to the US k90. Apparently the original user prefered the US k90 over the asian K90.
     
    #18
  19. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,426
    I'm confused. You claimed to have demoed the AK90 over a month and a half ago, and so already knew its stability and power level and even commented on it. :confused:

    Originally posted by AlpineCadet on 7/16/07:
    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1596010&postcount=1645

    And from your OP above:
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2007
    #19
  20. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,649
    Are you trying to stalk or insult/harass me?

    The racket that I am about to demo has been customized to almost match the weight and balance of a ProStaff 85. I believe this AK90 is almost 13 ounces, if not more. Hopefully it should play like a more forgiving PS85, but with a little more pop and spin. A review to follow! ;)
     
    #20
  21. Azzurri

    Azzurri Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    7,884
    Location:
    Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
    I am a bit confused. Have you hit with a STOCK AK90? I bought and LOVED the US K90, but had issues after the 1st set. Not because of the type of racquet (90in players), but the weight. The weight got to me after the first set. I had problems with my serve (too many hit the net) and it actually felt heavy in my hands, so heavy that I would hold it with my other hand between points. It was noticeable. I used to play with a Max 200g and PS 85 in my teenage and 20's, so I was a little surprised.;)

    So I sell them and get a fe Asian K90's. Other than being easier to swing (a little), it just felt a whole lot lighter. I have been using the Asian Tour 90 and AK90 since March. I have not felt the need to hold my racquet in my non-playing hand. Monday eve I played a 3 hour doubles match (tight 3 setter) and the racquet never felt heavy.

    I think the both the US and Asian play very similiar. I do think return of serve is better (for me) with the US and a little more pace on both wings (I noticed that right away), but I could not compare the serve and net game to the Asian. I could serve with more spin and placement with the AK90, more power too. I lose a little in "plow through" effect, but that's about it.

    I realize its only .7 ounces difference, but its noticeable. Also, its still quite heavy (as BP stated) compared to most racquets.:)
     
    #21
  22. Azzurri

    Azzurri Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    7,884
    Location:
    Next door to Elisha Cuthbert.
    You don't think a 12 oz racquet is heavy enough for a "real man"?;)

    Both of mine weigh over 12 oz when I add vibration dampener and overgrip.:)
     
    #22

Share This Page