net clearance

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by MajinX, Apr 2, 2010.

  1. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    just saw an interesting stat while watching soderling vs berdych, the average height above the net, or net clearance of a shot.

    Berdych - 67cm (i might have messed up b/w this with soderlings but they are so close so no matter)
    soderling - 65cm
    Nadal - 81cm

    Those 3 were the only ones the commentators but its interesting to see how much spin nadal plays with and how flat those two are. I wonder wats the average in the top 100.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2010
    #1
  2. stapler

    stapler Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    846
    What unit of measurement are these for?
     
    #2
  3. Greek Goliath

    Greek Goliath Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    260
    Location:
    Approaching the Net for a Volley
    Cm, I presume?

    Cheers,

    Greek Goliath
     
    #3
  4. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    60 cm above the net is hardly flat, considering how they are whacking the ball. It would go to the wall if it had no spin.
     
    #4
  5. Ambivalent

    Ambivalent Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,865
    I saw 57 Berdych and 65 for Soderling.
     
    #5
  6. Sephiroth619

    Sephiroth619 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    376
    Location:
    Diamond Bar, CA
    I bet Fed's avg net clearance is in the single digits.
     
    #6
  7. finchy

    finchy Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,437
    Can't tell if you are being serious, but thats true on his slices at least. Some of the points on youtube show him getting the ball up pretty high. He uses a lot of spin even though it may not look like it.
     
    #7
  8. Gugafan

    Gugafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,949
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Berdych probably hits one of the flattest balls amongst the top players.
     
    #8
  9. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    60 cm is relatively flat, i play tennis and the average shot goes above 60 for sure, i mean no1 consistently whacks flat balls 30 cm above the net, thats just asking for an error.
     
    #9
  10. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    Wait 60cm for Sod/Berd? That's a lot isn't it...? Two feet!! I thought they hit much flatter than that...
     
    #10
  11. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    ... imagine a tennis court, and a net and a ball flying one feet above the net everytime... its ridiculous. 2 feet is very flat.
     
    #11
  12. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Do you hit your rally shots at 70 mph? That's about what they were hitting today.
     
    #12
  13. clover

    clover Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    182
    2 feet is not that high given that they are probably much taller than most of us, and they hit a bit of spin as well.
     
    #13
  14. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    ...

    Seriously, I play tennis too... I always imagined myself as hitting with decent net clearance, and I clear the net by about 2 feet too...

    Maybe I'm just deluded :p.
     
    #14
  15. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    Now way it was 81 cm for Rafa. More like 81 in! At Miami last year, they said he was hitting the ball I think 2.5 meters or so above the net.
     
    #15
  16. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    lol iuno but when i play i definitely clear it by more than 2 on average, once in a while ill get in a good hard flat shot lower than 2, but like i said on average its much higher, this includes all lobs and defensive on the run forehands etc. also its hard to judge the height of the ball as it goes over the net from how far we are standing..
     
    #16
  17. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    Yeah I suppose I'm just crap at judging it. I always thought a foot above the net was pretty good already. Very obviously, my concept of a foot is not particularly accurate... :p
     
    #17
  18. KiNG

    KiNG Rookie

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    192
    A foot above the net...thats crazy, you don't do it unless for passing shot and slice.

    3 to 6 feet above the net is good for a neutral rally. Thats why we need spin. Even good ping pong players clear the net by a much larger margin than we would think.
     
    #18
  19. KiNG

    KiNG Rookie

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    192
    And one other thing that always makes us want to hit sooooo close to the net is that because the net is a net, it can be seen through. If it wasn't, if it was made with a solid piece of board or something, I gaurantee you'll want to hit the ball so much higher above the net.
     
    #19
  20. defrule

    defrule Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    823
    That would be awesome. If you ever "net" a ball then it rebound straight back for you to pick. No need to run to the net to get all the balls.
     
    #20
  21. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    I retract this statement. It was 1.7 meters above the net.
     
    #21

Share This Page