New forehand options alter biomechanics of tennis

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by Marius_Hancu, Sep 29, 2005.

  1. Marius_Hancu

    Marius_Hancu G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    17,790
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    For the more studious:)
    Well, not that recent, but I am not sure if it's been presented here ... and has many valid points.
    ---------------------------
    http://www.biomech.com/db_area/archives/1999/9901function.51-60.bio-.html

    BioMechanics
    January 1999

    Function Analysis:
    New forehand options alter biomechanics of tennis


    New rackets and grips mean more power and accuracy, but also the potential for increased injury.

    By Rafael Bahamonde, PhD
     
    #1
  2. ShooterMcMarco

    ShooterMcMarco Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,017
    good article

    "The optimum angle of the racket in the vertical plane has been suggested to be 28º This angle provides good spin production and speed when the ball is struck properly. Smaller angles tend to produce less spin, while larger angles sacrifice ball speed and depth of the shot." in other words, nadal buggy whip vs. federer body wrap. "Regardless of the grip, stroke arc, swing, and footwork, proper execution of a topspin forehand stroke requires a nearly vertical or a slightly closed-face (slightly tilted forward) (7º) racket at impact" so this answers our questions about closed face: we have small margin for error if we try to hit it that way.

    good find marius (as usual) , thanks for sharing it with us :mrgreen:
     
    #2

Share This Page