No chances for Federer to win the WTF!

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Paullaconte1, Nov 8, 2012.

  1. Federer20042006

    Federer20042006 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,173
    Something seems physically wrong with him. I think his legs are giving out.
     
    #51
  2. nikdom

    nikdom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,725
    Location:
    Tennisville
    The title is a little unfortunate, implying that Roger doesn't have the ability to win, rather than suggesting that he isn't in the form, but I agree with the prognosis - Roger likely will bow out in the semis.


    To me, the Wimbledon win was his main goal and his motivation/energy/fighting instinct haven't been the same since. This is not to take away from Berdych, Murray and JMDP anything for beating Roger. But purely from Rogers side, he hasn't been able to sustain the intensity after the draining silver match against JMDP at the Olympics.

    Perhaps he tried through sheer will power to hold on to the no.1 for as long as he could with the trip to shanghai but I don't see him really very perturbed with his form/losses. (notably with the serve)

    He played a long season in chasing no.1. I think we won't see him back in form until next year..
     
    #52
  3. Paullaconte1

    Paullaconte1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    I agree he is much slower and since Shanghai/Basel he was very moody. Like knowing that something was wrong.

    Sometimes he does not react and it seems that he does not react as a choice.

    When he was 1 break up in the second he tried to end up all games very quickly trying to go to the third set as soon as possible.

    I can't see a win with Murray, but he is the Maestro, so there is always hope.
     
    #53
  4. smoledman

    smoledman Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,529
    Location:
    USA
    It's like he's severely declined all of a sudden after Cincy. Yeah in pro tennis it can happen that fast.
     
    #54
  5. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    31,129
    Location:
    New York
    I don't understand why all (or a lot of) Fed fans are claiming that Fed has played like crap since the Olympics. Cincy doesn' t count then? Why not? He destroyed Djoko in the final. I would have thought Fed fans would remember that better than me.
     
    #55
  6. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,436
    Location:
    England
    I think both are playing well below their best. Whoever wins tomorrow will probably be the one who plays closest to their own level.

    Fingers crossed they can both step it up and it will be a great match, with Murray winning :)
     
    #56
  7. forzamilan90

    forzamilan90 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,573
    It's cause of high standards set by Federer, but still that Cincy results is solid, though Fed's U.S. Open exit was disappointing and overshadows the Cincy result
     
    #57
  8. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,800
    Location:
    Weak era
    Indeed, there have even been cases of tennis players declining massively already at the age of 24 and suddenly start playing sloppy, uninspired, flat and subpeak tennis out of nowhere.
     
    #58
  9. Paullaconte1

    Paullaconte1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    I think because in Cinci Djokovic was absolutely dead in the final. Fed bagelled him in the first set, but then he was close to lose the second.

    That was also strange because Fed was really fresh and Djokovic was really dead.

    Fed admitted it in an interview.
     
    #59
  10. Candide

    Candide Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    990
    Location:
    Yabba, the greatest little place on Earth
    He's always got a chance. It's all big boys at this stage and the margins between them all are slight despite some of the inflated claims on this thread. Djokovic is probably the favourite given his steady form to this point but form can go out the window in the space of a few games. It's really exciting whatever way it goes.
     
    #60
  11. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    31,129
    Location:
    New York
    To Paullaconte: I didn't know he had admitted it. He doesn't always do. Good for him.
     
    #61
  12. Goosehead

    Goosehead Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,599
    Location:
    A bloke in Brighton, England.
    i dont think losing to berdych at the u s open is a big deal on any given day berdych can blow anyone away,

    and losing to murray in shanghai..well he only went really to get his 300wks at no1, he prob would have w/d from event otherwise..and this is peak murray..

    losing to del potro twice..juan has been improving all year, its no surprise he ended his 6match losing streak (close at olympics, was 2 sets up at french open but inhibited by knee injury, then juan w/d queens)

    less of the doom and gloom i think...i dont see him doing a sampras and be flapping aroung the world 15 rank in 2013.
     
    #62
  13. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,896
    Location:
    So Cal
    Keyboard warriors know no shame.

    Isn't that the truth. Easy to win when you're at your best. Serving 40% in a set and still winning is very impressive.

    I think Djokovic has looked slightly better than Fed, who looked slightly better than Murray. But we'll find out Sun/Mon who can pull out 2 matches and win it.
     
    #63
  14. Huanita99

    Huanita99 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    209
    Fed is so going down tomorrow. It's hilarious how many Fed fans are so delusional. Djokovic is winning this easily btw like it or not. miss Rafa.
     
    #64
  15. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    31,360
    Location:
    Far from suresh's "drying up pool of old farts"
    Delpotro will beat Djokovic then Roger will beat Delpo to win WTF
     
    #65
  16. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,686


    Is this you fantasizing again,Senti? :)
     
    #66
  17. sbengte

    sbengte Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    8,842
    Wrong. Three big boys and one old man. It was somewhat clear to me even before the WTF began that Fed is not a serious contender here based on his year so far and his form.
     
    #67
  18. merlinpinpin

    merlinpinpin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,587
    Good stuff! :lol:

    302lols
     
    #68
  19. Rozroz

    Rozroz Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,244
    goodbye ol' Fed :(
     
    #69
  20. sbengte

    sbengte Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    8,842
    Well, 302 and all his achievements earlier in the year are precisely the reason why I thought he wouldn't do well here. He has played a lot already and has achieved his goals for the year. The weariness from all of it must be catching up. Add to it the fact that he is 5 years older than his nearest rivals.
    Think 2009, when he similarly fulfilled most of his goals by Wimbledon. His post USO season then including WTF was quite meh, similar to this year.
     
    #70
  21. merlinpinpin

    merlinpinpin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,587
    You could also have said that he always wins his Masters two in a row, never won a third one. Still, the matches have to be played, so we'll see. ;)
     
    #71
  22. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    15,004
    You are not wrong. Fed is not winning this WTF. (from a fellow Fed fan)
     
    #72
  23. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    15,004
    Fed played well at Cincy but since then has been crap. :(
     
    #73
  24. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    15,004
    Don't worry, hard to see how Murray will not win the match against Fed.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2012
    #74
  25. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Federer won't be beating Murray, or if he does it will be EXTREMELY close.
     
    #75
  26. coloskier

    coloskier Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,580

    Ooops. Care to rewrite????
     
    #76
  27. Candide

    Candide Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    990
    Location:
    Yabba, the greatest little place on Earth
    Ol' man river,
    Dat ol' man river
    He mus'know sumpin'
    But don't say nuthin',
    He jes'keeps rollin'
    He keeps on rollin' along.
     
    #77
  28. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Federer is a magician.
     
    #78
  29. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,284
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    I wouldve thought people would learn to not doubt Federer at this point...
     
    #79
  30. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Federer lost to Del Potro and I thought Murray had his number at this point.
     
    #80
  31. pvaudio

    pvaudio Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,543
    It's like his age is right beneath his skin, yearning to break free. Most of the time he's in control of it, but sometimes he just looks slow and the age takes over. Other times he looks like a 25 year old...because he straight sets 25 year olds at their peak.
     
    #81
  32. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Federer might just be the greatest, most consistent player ever.
     
    #82
  33. Paullaconte1

    Paullaconte1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    Ooops... Can I re-write the entire post? lol
     
    #83
  34. jokinla

    jokinla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,705
    Yep no chance at all.
     
    #84
  35. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,813
    He cannot win against the top guys
     
    #85
  36. Dharmaboy

    Dharmaboy Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    225
    Location:
    Canada
    Love these threads. sure he has a challenge to beat the guys in the top 4 now but they all have a good 5 years on him don't they? Its amazing how your body can't keep up to guys who are much younger. it makes a huge difference.
     
    #86
  37. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,284
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    He IS one of the top guys.
     
    #87
  38. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    And he has been for several years.
     
    #88
  39. Paullaconte1

    Paullaconte1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    Pity... Roger was there for Grab... But Djokovic mental attitude is incredible
     
    #89
  40. RanchDressing

    RanchDressing Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    These few threads are exact proof that 90% of the people posting on these boards are so full of biased crap, and a general lack of knowledge for the game that it's pathetic.
     
    #90
  41. jokinla

    jokinla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,705
    He just came down from #1, as in the top guy, he beat Murray yesterday, and bageled the current #1 in route to a victory a couple of months ago, so I'm thinking he can win against the top guys.
     
    #91
  42. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,800
    Location:
    Weak era
    Actually, since 2003 so more like a decade (let's presume he'll be one of the "top guys" in 2013 as well).
     
    #92
  43. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Or even the end of 2002, but who's counting?
     
    #93
  44. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,800
    Location:
    Weak era
    You aren't apparently, as you said "several years".
     
    #94
  45. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    Because that is "several years". Several years could mean twenty years, ten years and the like.
     
    #95
  46. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    31,129
    Location:
    New York
    Well, he had a chance but he lost it. Too bad.
     
    #96
  47. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,800
    Location:
    Weak era
    No.

    Several means more than two but not many.
     
    #97
  48. Sabratha

    Sabratha G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,538
    Location:
    Australia
    One could argue ten isn't many.
     
    #98
  49. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,773
    He made 42 UE's yesterday. He will continue to lose if he keeps on playing like that. He is losing his magic touch.
     
    #99
  50. namelessone

    namelessone Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    9,745
    LOL at the title of this thread.

    If he had been a bit more consistent in key moments yesterday, he could have beaten the world nr.1, who is five years younger and arguably in his prime.
     

Share This Page