no DUBS coverage at all...

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by KBalla08, Jul 4, 2006.

  1. KBalla08

    KBalla08 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    593
    why the hell arent they showing any doubles matches? they say dubs isnt popular or whatever, but how will they help the cause by not showing it at all? really pisses me off...
     
    #1
  2. jaykay

    jaykay Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    992
    I believe it is the Bryan Bros vs Bjorkman/Mirnyi... #1 vs #2 seeds. Should be a classic.

    It is undeed tragic that they are not broadcasting this...
     
    #2
  3. KBalla08

    KBalla08 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    593
    well that should be the final, yes, but they are in the semis now after today, so maybe they will show some of that...
     
    #3
  4. Grimjack

    Grimjack Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    "Help the cause?" Network TV ain't charity work. They aren't in the business of helping causes. The networks, unlike the ATP, understand that doubles is nothing but a huge vacuum sucking up profits and distributing them to unworthy players who do nothing to help generate them. Showing these pseudo-pros on network TV would be ratings death, and whatever program director suggested that they be put on the air in the first place would be justifiably fired immediately when the advertisers started complaining about the ratings collapse.

    Pro tennis ought to wake up and be rid of doubles altogether. Nobody is interested. Doubles is for fat weekend hacks, not professional athletes.
     
    #4
  5. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,570
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    I have been watching all the doubles, including the coverage of Martina Navratilova. I didn't get to see the end of the Bryans match, but Bjorkmann and Myrni dominated. They've looked good all tournament long. Both the top seeds are playing very well.

    The Wimbledon feed is really a bargain at $20 for the tournament. There are matches that have commentary and refreshingly, those that don't.

    I think pro doubles is more exciting than singles. The doubles competition is more a throwback to a serve and volley type tennis. There is more shot selection, great net play, and the players seems to exude more personality.
     
    #5
  6. Steve Huff

    Steve Huff Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,266
    Yeah! And basketball should be 1 on 1. Forget this 5 on 5 crap. Any semi-pro can catch a ball and pass it. Bulls and Lakers prooved that, didn't they?
     
    #6
  7. uNIVERSE mAN

    uNIVERSE mAN Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    331
    agreed.
     
    #7
  8. counterpunch

    counterpunch Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    267
    i do wish they would show at least some. not to spoil anything but there is an epic battle going on right now.
     
    #8
  9. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,570
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Ratings are so far down now, they should try anything. I'll bet Navratilova could draw some TV ratings in the US.
     
    #9
  10. KBalla08

    KBalla08 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    593
    dude knowles and nestor just played a 23-21 5th set... they didnt finish yesterday, they were 11-11 in the 5th, and finished it at 23-21... man that mustve been sweet... espn shows the last point lol
     
    #10
  11. skip1969

    skip1969 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,447
    Location:
    Pleasantville
    yeah, we got a real feel for the longest match in wimbledon history from that match point, didn't we?:D
     
    #11
  12. Steve Huff

    Steve Huff Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,266
    NBC showed a whole 3-5 minutes of this match. They cut it off at 18-17. I was glued to my seat (for 5 minutes anyway) thinking they would surely show the end of it. But 5 minutes--wow. I guess they didn't have their replay ready to go at the time.
     
    #12
  13. dubsplayer

    dubsplayer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    Can you imagine the hysteria amongst most posters and the number of threads generated, on this and other broards, if they left singles qf matches to show it?
     
    #13
  14. jack mckinney

    jack mckinney Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    264
    i know that each of us like to watch different things. but i think instead of showing matches over and over they could show doubles. i really enjoy watching them and think it is more exciting than watching some of the blow out singles that we see.
     
    #14
  15. Volly master

    Volly master Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    656
    because hearing sharapova's screams and cleavage is enough for the common man to ********** at home after he is done watching 9 hours of tennis
     
    #15
  16. tpduke112

    tpduke112 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    350
    To me, doubles isnt even real tennis.......
     
    #16

Share This Page