Only 1 Men's Semi on TV? And not until 11:30PM?

Discussion in 'Pacific Life Open' started by Fidelica, Mar 18, 2006.

  1. Fidelica

    Fidelica New User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2004
    Messages:
    41
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    This is unbelievable. They cover matches from days 1 and 2 but not the semis?
     
    #1
  2. LowProfile

    LowProfile Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,441
    They're showing the men's semis at all? This is good news. I originally thought that they planned to skip it all together.

    Federer vs. Srichapan would be a very interesting match, but my guess is that they'll show Blake vs. Nadal (also a very interesting match, but probably because Blake is American).
     
    #2
  3. Tchocky

    Tchocky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,816
    Location:
    The OC
    Do we have any idea what semi they will show? I think the Blake/Nadal semi would be more interesting. I can't imagine Paradorn taking a set from Roger.
     
    #3
  4. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    Maybe ESPN doesnt want to show live Srichaphan matches because of his religious values. If you watch some of his matches, he meditates after the match. I think that may offend some people.
     
    #4
  5. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,074
    Only in America.
     
    #5
  6. GOT STRING?

    GOT STRING? Guest

    Pacific Life Open Semi Scores "LIVE" ??????

    I can't believe that the only way to stay informed as to the men's semi final matches is by going to the tournament website. I can't believe that they show the women's semi matches and not the men's? Let me correct myself. According to Directv, they will show the "BEST" semi at 11:30 PM PST. CRAZY!!!!!!!
     
    #6
  7. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    They will be showing the mens semifinal match between Federer and Srichaphan at 2:00AM EST.
     
    #7
  8. gully

    gully Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    792
    Source, please?

    ESPN's website shows Blake-Nadal at 2:30 am est.

    PS -- For anyone who gets ESPN Deportes, that schedule shows PLO from 3-7 am EST.
     
    #8
  9. Fee

    Fee Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,299
    Location:
    In front of my computer, obviously
    Please tell me you're kidding.

    Paradorn doesn't 'meditate' on court after his matches. He bows to all four corners, win or lose, to say thank you. And ESPN has shown many of his matches before, and they usually stick around to show him doing that (which they have done on his highlight clips already this week).
     
    #9
  10. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    Nope, it'll be Blake vs. Nadal. Don't forget that Blake is American and the other match, well, look in the "Match Results" forum............
     
    #10
  11. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    What's wrong with meditating? He's just clearing and relaxing his mind after a stressful mental battle on court. Why is that offensive? :confused:
     
    #11
  12. The General

    The General New User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    22
    Womens final @ 5:30 Est here in states and Mens Semi is 7:35 Est tonight. 4:30 Est currently. Both on ESPN2.
     
    #12
  13. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,074
    He did meditate after the Jarko match. And it was in the back court.
     
    #13
  14. znoopie

    znoopie Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    138
    Location:
    Davis
    Also after his match with Nalbandian. Not sure about his first three matches, though.
     
    #14
  15. JacktheDu

    JacktheDu Guest

    What are you guys complaining about? At least you have one match. There's not even one showing of semi final matches here in vancouver canada. You what what we have instead? 3 hours of CURLING!! Seriously, who watches that damn sport anyway?? It's like watching a slower, longer, stupier version of bowling. Nothing can be worse :mad:
     
    #15
  16. ssuHeartsRivald

    ssuHeartsRivald Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    295
    Why should ESPN worry he will meditate after the match. I believe he wouldn't mediatate if he had lost. And we know that almost impossible that Federer lost to Paradorn and yeah Federer won. So i think surely that's not a thing for ESPN.
     
    #16
  17. thejerk

    thejerk Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    472
    ESPN, played Blake/Nadal match. I think it was the best match of the tournament. Well, actually, I think any match with Sharapova and Hingis in it is the best match is the best. I have a hard time watching them though because I'm crying by the end of it and can't see anyway.

    Gotta say, ESPN'S choices of sporting events suck. I think the actual tennis coverage itself has been pretty awesome though. ESPN has shown alot more ground level live shots. I would be happy if they showed ground level during the entire match. I love the way you can see what the ball is doing in relation to the net. I think this is the best video crew I have ever seen cover a tennis tournament. It is like the dirctor actually plays tennis.

    On a side note: ESPN's choice of programming sucks. Crazy baseball game, softball game, curling, drag racing.
     
    #17
  18. tonysk83

    tonysk83 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    583
    Yeah, who actually watches drag racing anyways, that stuff is so boring. I fell asleep during the womens final, looks like I didn't miss much.
     
    #18
  19. jtreed2000

    jtreed2000 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    357
    It's all media and politics. I'm glad I get to see some tennis, but at the same time you have to wonder what's wrong with this picture. How many millions of fans and dollars are part of tennis or soccer, etc yet no one in the US (or elsewhere) provides sufficient coverage of it. Those are the two most popular sports in the world, yet we see a collegiate basketball double header or drag racing. Come on!! What's is up with that?!! I'm not really a soccer fan, but I believe it deserves more attention since it is a huge world sport.

    It is sports censorship IMO. I get sick of the garbage on TV, for example rasslin' (wrestling, WWF, etc) which has better coverage than tennis. Football, basketball, baseball, and all other American dominant sports (I am American) are forced down our throats. There is so much more to see than 10 hours of ESPN highlights of how somebody makes one dunk or throws 20 passes to beat someone 50-3. And POKER? Since when is this a sport?

    -Fed up
     
    #19

Share This Page