Open era leaders in the top 14 events

FHtennisman

Professional
At the Eighth Masters? Federer has 3 titles (2 in Shanghai, 1 in Madrid) and 2 other finals (1 in Madrid, 1 in Shanghai).

So he need another win at Shanghai to claim a lead in another title to make it 7. Maybe Murray will be back to full form there and we might get a Murderer final to get the final coronation of the best player in the 8th Masters of the season?
 

Tornes

Semi-Pro
I'm going with the official ATP stats which dates Masters events from 1990 (when they first became mandatory events).

Well OP obviously count even Masters before 1990, because he has Lendl there. But yeah, since 1990 Murray leads.

And if I am not mistaken first time Masters become mandatory was 2009, before that anybody could skip them as he wanted. In 1990 they just created ATP world tour and Masters become part of it.
 

timnz

Legend
Well OP obviously count even Masters before 1990, because he has Lendl there. But yeah, since 1990 Murray leads.

And if I am not mistaken first time Masters become mandatory was 2009, before that anybody could skip them as he wanted. In 1990 they just created ATP world tour and Masters become part of it.
It was difficult for me to work out if 1990 was the division or not. That is true
 

Nadalgaenger

G.O.A.T.
In the Open era, who are the leaders at the 4 Slams, the WTF and the 9 Masters 1000's?

Australian Open - Federer - 6 Wins, 1 runner up, 7 Semi-finals (Note: Djokovic with 6 wins and 3 Quarter finals behind Federer)

French Open - Nadal - 10 Wins

Wimbledon - Federer - 8 Wins, 3 runner-ups

US Open - Sampras - 5 wins, 3 runner-ups (Note: Federer at 5 wins and 2 runner-ups, Connors at 5 wins and 2 runner-ups, both behind Sampras)

WTF - Federer - 6 wins, 4 runner-ups

Indian Wells - Federer - 5 wins, 2 runner-ups (Note: Djokovic at 5 wins and 1 runner-up, slightly behind)

Miami - Agassi - 6 wins, 2 runner-ups (Note: Djokovic at 6 wins and 1 runner-up, slightly behind)

Monte Carlo - Nadal 10 wins, 1 runner-up

Rome - Nadal - 7 wins, 2 runner-ups

Hamburg (until and including 2008)/Madrid Clay (2009 onwards) - Federer 6 wins, 2 runner-ups (note: Nadal 5 wins, 4 runner-ups - very close)

Canadian Open - Lendl - 6 wins, 3 runner-ups

Cincinatti - Federer - 7 wins

Madrid Indoor(until and including 2008)/Shanghai - Murray - 4 wins, 1 runner-up

Paris Indoor - Djokovic - 4 wins

So at the top 14 events we have:

Federer - leading at 6 events

Nadal - leading at 3 events

Djokovic - leading at 1 event

Sampras - leading at 1 event

Lendl - leading at 1 event

Agassi - leading at 1 event

Murray - leading at 1 event

Wow. #MuryGOAT leads the four best players of the Open Era at an event. Was it even around in Sampras’ day?
 

mr tonyz

Professional
Once Federer wins US Open this year he will lead on 7/14 big events! Undisputed GOAT.

Or Federer would drop down to a paltry 5/14 "Big Titles" even with a #6 US Open OE GOAT win this year if Djoker takes out Indian Wells & Nadal takes out Madrid :D

I'd take that trade-off . Then We can have #7 AO next year too so RF Would be all time Wimbledon & Australian Open GOAT (Tied with Djoker @ AO just doesn't cut it , Sampras @ Wimbledon was first , mission accomplished . Next in line Djoker!) whilst 'only' being Open Era US Open GOAT too :p

#Cryptic . 0-7. 8-7 , 3-0 , 3-1 , 4-1 , 4-6 , 6-6 .
 
Which of these 14 have the ATG 3 not won?

I know Rafa hasn't won Miami, Paris, Shanghai (although he won this event when it was the Madrid indoors) or WTF
Fed I think still needs Rome & Monte Carlo
Djoker only needs Cincy for the full set - I can't believe he hasn't wont this on his pet surface after being to the final five times.

Seems like Djoker is most likely to get the full set.
 

mr tonyz

Professional
Which of these 14 have the ATG 3 not won?

I know Rafa hasn't won Miami, Paris, Shanghai (although he won this event when it was the Madrid indoors) or WTF
Fed I think still needs Rome & Monte Carlo
Djoker only needs Cincy for the full set - I can't believe he hasn't wont this on his pet surface after being to the final five times.

Seems like Djoker is most likely to get the full set.

This is the chart that you are seeking ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_(tennis)

Scroll down to Top-level tournament records
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Time flies, any updates now?

On top of my head:

AO: Djoko
IW: Fed/Djoko tied
Miami: Djoko/Agassi tied
Monte Carlo: Nadal
Rome: Nadal
Hamburg/Madrid: Fed/Nadal tied?
Wimbledon: Fed
Canada: Nadal or Lendl?
Cincy: Fed
USO: Fed/Sampras/Connors tied
Madrid/Shanghai: Djoko or Lendl?
Paris: Djoko
YEC: Fed
 
Last edited:

abmk

Bionic Poster
Checked:

Hamburg/Madrid: Federer
Canada: Lendl
Madrid/Shanghai: Djokovic

wasn't sure if Nadal had 5 or 6 at Hamburg/Madrid, if Lendl had 5 or 6 at Canada (Nadal has 5), if Lendl had 4 at Madrid/Shanghai.
 
Top