People with fair features becoming increasingly rare Worldwide?

[The_Mental_Giant]

Facts to support my theory

1)Darker hair , eyes, and skin tend to be dominant over Lighter features.
2)World population is currently 75% residing in Africa or Asia, which is almost exclusively darker featured. We could add pretty much the Americas which is largly darker featured aswell.
3) If we look at the recent studies published its becomes quite clear that the population explosion happening in Asia/middle east and Specially the subsaharian African nations. It's estimated that by 20100 there will be about 11 billion people in this planet earth, out of the increased population which accounts for additional 3,8 billion people (current population stands at 7,2 billion)It's estimated that roughly the 85% of all that increase will ocuur in African nations, which will quadruple from now to the end of the century. The rest of the population growing will ocuur mainly in Asian nations and other third world countries not particularly known for their lighter featured populations. European countries will remain steady and likely to hit the decline. The later continent's figures would be displaying a negative record for the whole European Landmass area if there weren't happening an skewed population growing thanks to the increasingly immigration in the last decased of peoples from African, Middle eastern and southern/south-east asian regions. It's no coincidence that those nations which show a more impressive birth-rates among the european populations are those who encourage immigration at large scale, such as France, Netherlands, the UK, etc.

4) Birth rates ... Most european countries remain steady population-wise because of the goverments regulating immigration in order to keep the balance, if there were ocuuring less immigration from middle east, africa and south/south-east asia in western europe, the birth rates would be just as awfuly low as the Eastern european nations which are already on the slight decline.

Dont you agree? if we look at 50 years ago Its obvious that there were more light featured people than nowadays.

 

[Sentinel]

Tough luck, kid.

 

[Topspin Shot]

Dont you agree? if we look at 50 years ago Its obvious that there were more light featured people than nowadays.

What sources from 1964 are you looking at?

 

[KtM]

The way I look at it... What is the cause of blonde hair and very pale skin, well genetic trait beneftial to those in northern colder environment with less sunlight. Those places are naturally less hospitable to human growth, given there is less vegetation and less animals, those places naturally have less people.

So the areas of the world with darker skinned/haired people usually can support more people and higher population density per area of land. Historically speakingthe places of the world with darker skinned people often times could sustain more people than the areas of the world populated with fair skin/haired people. Italy/Germany can naturally sustain higher population density than Norway/Sweden.

Along the equator there is the exception because of the low precipitation along much of the equator but you get what I mean... I hope.

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

The way I look at it... What is the cause of blonde hair and very pale skin, well genetic trait beneftial to those in northern colder environment with less sunlight. Those places are naturally less hospitable to human growth, given there is less vegetation and less animals, those places naturally have less people.

So the areas of the world with darker skinned/haired people usually can support more people and higher population density per area of land. Historically speakingthe places of the world with darker skinned people often times could sustain more people than the areas of the world populated with fair skin/haired people. Italy/Germany can naturally sustain higher population density than Norway/Sweden.

Along the equator there is the exception because of the low precipitation along much of the equator but you get what I mean... I hope.

Germany has a lot of blonde people, so I dont know what you are talking about.

Light hair has nothing to do with climate.

 

[heninfan99]

Well, you had the whole Breivik thing.

With the mass immigration into Northern Europe they are mongrelising the population deliberately.

Look at Malmo in Sweden as an example.

History shows it is the white people of Europe that have shown the most rebellion to the powers that be.

They want to breed that out by mongrelising the population there.

 

[KtM]

Germany has a lot of blonde people, so I dont know what you are talking about.

Light hair has nothing to do with climate.

Okay i rewrite that but without germany. But I hope you get what I'm pointing out regarding skin pigment.

Now this is just my rumination but its plausible that there are advantages to lighter color hair amongst northern europeans that helped to a degree in antiquity propagate the trait. Back during the hunter gatherer days during winter darker color beards/hair would be easier for prey to spot against the snow. Much like there is benefit to seals, arctic timber wolves, arctic foxes, arctic hares, polar bears, and numerous other animals of northern latitudes with pale fur.

 

[KtM]

Dont you agree? if we look at 50 years ago Its obvious that there were more light featured people than nowadays.

Given the population increases since 1965 in Slavic, Scandinavian and other european countries with high % of light featured people are you certain of your statement?

 

[heninfan99]

So OP can we cut to the chase...are you a eugenicist or just prefer blondes?

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

Given the population increases since 1965 in Slavic, Scandinavian and other european countries with high % of light featured people are you certain of your statement?

regardles if it grew since back then, It became steady since 1990's and most of the growth experienced in the last 3 decades is mostly due to recent immigrants there having higher birth rates. Look at countries such as France, Netherlands, UK, Belgium or Sweden, they basically grow or remain steady thanks to the non-european foreigners (specially africans, middle easterns and south/south-east asians) inflating the birth rate numbers.

Europe represented about 25% of world population back in 1930.

Nowadays only 10% of the world population lives in europe, and more so the 10 % residing in europe is proportionally more diverse and less european than 80-85 years ago where every nation in europe was 95%+ consisting of people from their own ethnicity.

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

So OP can we cut to the chase...are you a eugenicist or just prefer blondes?

I prefer blondes, easily..

 

[Sentinel]

The sureshpocalypse has begun !!

We'll all be gettin darker, but at the same time our serves will improve by 20 mph, and everyone will be BIONIC !

 

[sureshs]

Facts to support my theory

2)World population is currently 75% residing in Africa or Asia, which is almost exclusively darker featured.

We could add pretty much the Americas which is largly darker featured aswell.

Yeah Chinese, Japanese and Koreans are darker featured LOL

North America was mostly made up of darker skinned people till the fairer skinned people came over and killed them.

 

[Topspin Shot]

With the mass immigration into Northern Europe they are mongrelising the population deliberately.

Look at Malmo in Sweden as an example.

History shows it is the white people of Europe that have shown the most rebellion to the powers that be.

They want to breed that out by mongrelising the population there.

Cough cough (racist) cough....

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

Yeah Chinese, Japanese and Koreans are darker featured LOL

North America was mostly made up of darker skinned people till the fairer skinned people came over and killed them.

CHinese, Japanese and Koreans are uniformly jet black haired and darkbrown eyed. Their skin isnt either that light, Its rather some graysh pale shade, but not light per see, they have darker skin than any european group.

Look at those japanese football players

yeah so light those japanese lol

Compare them with light featured europeans

 

[heninfan99]

I'd like to see a map based on hairyness next. The Japanese are quite hairy for Asians.

 

[sureshs]

CHinese, Japanese and Koreans are uniformly jet black haired and darkbrown eyed. Their skin isnt either that light, Its rather some graysh pale shade, but not light per see, they have darker skin than any european group.

Look at those japanese football players

yeah so light those japanese lol

Compare them with light featured europeans

Ah, I can now see the big difference. The top are all males, the bottom females.

 

[acura9927]

With the amount of Asian women snagging white guys its going to get worse.

 

[Fifth Set]

Okay i rewrite that but without germany. But I hope you get what I'm pointing out regarding skin pigment.

Now this is just my rumination but its plausible that there are advantages to lighter color hair amongst northern europeans that helped to a degree in antiquity propagate the trait. Back during the hunter gatherer days during winter darker color beards/hair would be easier for prey to spot against the snow. Much like there is benefit to seals, arctic timber wolves, arctic foxes, arctic hares, polar bears, and numerous other animals of northern latitudes with pale fur.

LOL, that's now two hilarious statements in the same thread. You're not understanding something very basic. Humans are different than turtles. Darwin was a genius, but evolution isn't responsible for blonde hair and it's almost entirely irrelevant in today's age of human mobility (e.g., massive immigration by brunettes into areas formerly dominated by blondes).

If you want to explore something more interesting in your free time, focus on the WHY behind the actual cause (migration and assimilation) of the changes observed in this thread.

I believe it's because poor people are desperate for work, freedom and prosperity. So, they move around. By land, by sea, whatever. Rich people are desperate to be viewed as sympathetic, kind and politically correct. So, they tolerate high rates of immigration and intermarriage in places like Sweden.

There isn't necessarily anything wrong with any of this. The alternative, in the extreme, is basically Nazism.

 

[FanOfLu]

CHinese, Japanese and Koreans are uniformly jet black haired and darkbrown eyed. Their skin isnt either that light, Its rather some graysh pale shade, but not light per see, they have darker skin than any european group.

Look at those japanese football players

yeah so light those japanese lol

Compare them with light featured europeans

LOL. Firstly, men are darker than women on average. Go look it up on Wikipedia. Secondly, basketball is played indoor and while football is played outdoor if you get where I'm heading. And what is up with the capitalization of the first two letters of the word "Chinese"? Are you trying to emphasize anything there?

 

[RF20Lennon]

A lot of fair people in Asia. The only thing is Asian fair isn't pale but rather has a yellow tone to it (India, Japan, China etc.)

 

[Sentinel]

North America was mostly made up of darker skinned people till the fairer skinned people came over and killed them.

That's not fair by any standards !

 

[PaulC]

Time for the OP to start the THIRD THREAD OF HIS TRILOGY...


1st: The World Is Getting Fewer Blondies

2nd: The World Is Getting Fewer Whities


Drumroll....


3rd: The World Is Getting Fewer Blue Eyes

Wait...

There should be also a 4th: The World Is Getting Fewer Redheads

An FYI for the OP: Many of the fairest of the fairest are redheads

:mrgreen:

 

[KtM]

The plight of the pale skinned Mongolians?

 

[heninfan99]

Are they slowly eliminating men?

The plight of the pale skinned Mongolians?

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

The plight of the pale skinned Mongolians?

Not really, Asians can be pale and look light in some pictures but if you put them aside any european group of people (even the darkest ones like greeks, italians, portuguese, spanish, bulgarian, serbian,etc) You will notice how the asian skin in average is darker.


even spanish are far lighter than any east asian group in average, and spanish are among the "darkies in europe"

Japanese pigmentation is similar to amerindian

 

[PaulC]

With the amount of Asian women snagging white guys its going to get worse.

Just ran into my pal (white like ghost who married a Chinese lady.

Showed me the pics of their 2 kids... Beautiful.

NOT a hint of Asian feature or skin tone... Reminded me Bruce Lee's children, both have strong Caucasian features, even the eyes are light brown/hazel.

(Or other Erasians like Alize Lim on the WTA tour)

By the times these kids marry other Caucasians and have their own kids, their Asian traces will fade away totally.

 

[FanOfLu]

Not really, Asians can be pale and look light in some pictures but if you put them aside any european group of people (even the darkest ones like greeks, italians, portuguese, spanish, bulgarian, serbian,etc) You will notice how the asian skin in average is darker.


even spanish are far lighter than any east asian group in average, and spanish are among the "darkies in europe"

Japanese pigmentation is similar to amerindian

Map of human skin color distribution in the world for native populations in 1940 based on Von Luschan's chromatic scale

It shows that East Asians are on-par with Spanish and Italians.

I find that Nishikori is no darker than Nadal.

 

[heninfan99]

Pretty much but I recently visited North Italy and many look like Seppi and are fair. It's a diff vibe & look than the rest of Italy.

It shows that East Asians are on-par with Spanish and Italians.


I find that Nishikori is no darker than Nadal.

 

[Dear Djordje]

She is really skewing the averages!

 

[Chico]

What is the point of this thread?

The question and the whole thread is not really "politically correct", not to use some stronger, more accurate word.

Not the first such tread by OP:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=513461

He obviously has some issues.

 

[Sally Aronsson]

She is really skewing the averages!

omg :lol: could at least get both sides in the same tone

 

[max]

I don't know if anyone's pointed this out, but the first world generally has a MUCH lower birthrate than the third world. IMHO this is because of dated Paul Ehrlich "the sky is falling" theories. (Well, at least he made a ton of money from the books and scared a couple million ovaries).

The real population question is the nasty "distribution of world's wealth" question.

But, yeah, if some groups make more babies, expect more babies to be made!

Of course, the big "tennis states": Florida, Texas, California, have a different population mix than other states in the Union.

 

[DRII]

LOL, that's now two hilarious statements in the same thread. You're not understanding something very basic. Humans are different than turtles. Darwin was a genius, but evolution isn't responsible for blonde hair and it's almost entirely irrelevant in today's age of human mobility (e.g., massive immigration by brunettes into areas formerly dominated by blondes).

If you want to explore something more interesting in your free time, focus on the WHY behind the actual cause (migration and assimilation) of the changes observed in this thread.

I believe it's because poor people are desperate for work, freedom and prosperity. So, they move around. By land, by sea, whatever. Rich people are desperate to be viewed as sympathetic, kind and politically correct. So, they tolerate high rates of immigration and intermarriage in places like Sweden.

There isn't necessarily anything wrong with any of this. The alternative, in the extreme, is basically Nazism.

pretty misguided...

you act as if 'moving around' is easy or cheap , in most cases its not. migrants actually tend to be the very motivated of their native populations, somewhat desperate as well but risk takers in general.

and the rich are trying to be seen as sympathetic, more likely many want cheaper labor!

 

[DRII]

perhaps the OP is upset that 'darker' features are seen as more attractive in general than 'fairer' features of late!

blonde and blue eyed really isn't the universal turn-on it used to be, not that it ever was universal...

 

[dParis]

perhaps the OP is upset that 'darker' features are seen as more attractive in general than 'fairer' features of late!

blonde and blue eyed really isn't the universal turn-on it used to be, not that it ever was universal...

Or perhaps you just saw this as an opportunity to project your racism on to someone else.

 

[DRII]

Or perhaps you just saw this as an opportunity to project your racism on to someone else.

how exactly does 'darker features' equate to racism

all 'races' can have darker features as described by the OP in the OP.

as usual context escapes you; followed by an emoticon

 

[LuckyR]

There are more blondes now than at any other time in history.


(I didn't say natural blondes...)

 

[BreakPoint]

CHinese, Japanese and Koreans are uniformly jet black haired and darkbrown eyed. Their skin isnt either that light, Its rather some graysh pale shade, but not light per see, they have darker skin than any european group.

Look at those japanese football players

yeah so light those japanese lol

Compare them with light featured europeans

You do realize that soccer (football) is played outdoors and that basketball is played indoors, right? And that being outdoors in the sun all day long will give you a tan, right?

For comparison, here's the Italian football team:

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

Pretty much but I recently visited North Italy and many look like Seppi and are fair. It's a diff vibe & look than the rest of Italy.

Sud tyrol maybe who are ethnic -austrians despite being part of italian territory, there are even german cards on streets,etc. Anything else is definitely more latin/southern european looking. I didnt see any particularly "light" people in Northern Italy, they looked like spaniards and other southern europeans.

 

[heninfan99]

^^Well, much of Europe is mix from past dominant societies. Nevertheless Garibaldi united Italy so it is what it is. Some of the greatest looking people, IMO, are from Northern Italy.
Lots of fair Spaniards too which we see in tennis from time to time.

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

I find that Nishikori is no darker than Nadal.

Well spaniards are one of the most addicted to tan nationalities, for both climate and lifestyle. East Asians for the contrary try to avoid sun as much as possible.

 

[chatt_town]

Not to worry...A few more diseases like Aids will pop up in Africa between now and 20100 I'm sure...or a few more episodes of ebola will control the population some.

Facts to support my theory

1)Darker hair , eyes, and skin tend to be dominant over Lighter features.
2)World population is currently 75% residing in Africa or Asia, which is almost exclusively darker featured. We could add pretty much the Americas which is largly darker featured aswell.
3) If we look at the recent studies published its becomes quite clear that the population explosion happening in Asia/middle east and Specially the subsaharian African nations. It's estimated that by 20100 there will be about 11 billion people in this planet earth, out of the increased population which accounts for additional 3,8 billion people (current population stands at 7,2 billion)It's estimated that roughly the 85% of all that increase will ocuur in African nations, which will quadruple from now to the end of the century. The rest of the population growing will ocuur mainly in Asian nations and other third world countries not particularly known for their lighter featured populations. European countries will remain steady and likely to hit the decline. The later continent's figures would be displaying a negative record for the whole European Landmass area if there weren't happening an skewed population growing thanks to the increasingly immigration in the last decased of peoples from African, Middle eastern and southern/south-east asian regions. It's no coincidence that those nations which show a more impressive birth-rates among the european populations are those who encourage immigration at large scale, such as France, Netherlands, the UK, etc.

4) Birth rates ... Most european countries remain steady population-wise because of the goverments regulating immigration in order to keep the balance, if there were ocuuring less immigration from middle east, africa and south/south-east asia in western europe, the birth rates would be just as awfuly low as the Eastern european nations which are already on the slight decline.

Dont you agree? if we look at 50 years ago Its obvious that there were more light featured people than nowadays.