Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Shashwat, Aug 17, 2007.
Can someone please compare K 95 to the Wilson Pro Staff Tour 95.
K95 >> tour 95...more power, more control, stiffer, rawer, heavier and just a notch higher level
if you're using a racket like a k6.1...you'll probably find the tour 95 to be a pathetic racket...i used to use the tour 95 and it's pretty unstable and not too solid
The k 6.1 would probably be closer to the 6.1 classic than the tour 95
This is like comparing oranges to grapefruit.
Thanks to the people who actually answered. It's just that i have never hit with the PS tour 95. I own a k95 and some guy was selling 8 tour 95's and was thinking if i should buy it. But i guess i shouldn't.
If you're comfortable with the K 95, the old Tour 95 will probably be just about useless for you. The K as I see it is the best update to the 6.1 line since the 6.1 Classic which I still use.
The Tour 95 is a bit of a "red herring" because of its title. It has some flex to it which would be fine if it weren't so light and unstable. I owned one and put a bit of lead on it, but that racquet just had no substance to it. I don't think I'd recommend it to anyone other than a rank beginner and I also think that there are several other lighter middleweight frames with superior playability including the Prince Diablo mp.
Separate names with a comma.