Prince deserves a pat on the back

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by netman, May 13, 2005.

  1. netman

    netman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,622
    Over the years reading the posts on this forum, I've lost count of the number or folks crucifying Prince for their efforts to push the envelope on racquet techonology. We all know the MORE technology didn't meet expectations. Isn't it funny that the new O3 racquets, which are the next generation of the MORE tech, are being praised by many, even some who slammed Prince during the Generation 1 (MORE) phase. Looks like the O3 tech could be a real winner.

    How about that? A company that is willing to put new tech out in the market, collect user feedback, and design an improved product that addresses the previous generation's shortcomings. The O3 racquets contain the best of many years of Prince work: From the MORE frames - fused sections, grommetless holes. From the Triple Threat frames - TT weighting, tapered frames, lighter the weight, the stiffer the frame. From the Thunder/Equipe years: the Sweetspot Suspension (i.e. larger holes equal bigger sweetspot). From the the CTS frames - Tapered frames allow fine tuning of flex characteristics.

    The ultra competitive nature of the tennis racquet business means manfacturers are constantly "borrowing" other manufacturers ideas and improving them. I think Prince deserves some credit for really pushing the tech envelope and showing the flexibility to change and enhance their designs when they don't meet user expectations. To quote Teddy Rooseveldt, "It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that, in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things. "
     
    #1
  2. Fuzzless

    Fuzzless Rookie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    108
    i would probably try an 03 if i was looking for a new racquet. if only prince would make a midsized one.

    and no, that is NOT a cue to start arguing about head size.
     
    #2
  3. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    netman,

    I think a lot of displeasure directed towards Prince is due to the quality of their past efforts. Im sure quite a number of people on this board remember the halcyon days of the Prince Magnesium Pro, Graphite Pro, Spectrum, CTS Lightning etc, etc. I realise Prince changed hands a few times but the enormous drop-off in quality left them open for deserved ridicule.

    While I do think the 03Tour is a fantastic racquet and the best thing Prince have produced since the CTS range (although the Diablo mid deserves a mention, even if it is coming too late for wider success) I still think the criticism is fair.

    A better quote would be "the proof of the pudding is in the eating". It makes no difference how much effort has gone into development or how revolutionary the idea. If it doesn't work you dont get points for trying. The Roosevelt quote is ironic because it is only criticism itself.

    Still, it will be interesting to see if Prince can put the 03 technology into an affordable racquet.
     
    #3
  4. lacoster

    lacoster Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    887
    It's just disappointing to see all the MORE racquets in the bargain bin for under 40 bucks at the club when they were priced at over $160+ last year. You lose alot of brand-loyal players to other companies that way.
    ________
    Iolite Vaporizer Review
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2011
    #4
  5. TennisD

    TennisD Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    655
    I would only try an 03 if it had a 93 square inch or lower head, and that's final.
     
    #5
  6. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    TennisD,
    you mean to say you wouldn't even have a hit with it because it hasn't got a 93sq head? How else are you able to make an informed comment if you don't try them out? I'd never buy a Weed but Id hit with one just so I knew how they played and I disliked the LM Rad and Bab PD but I hit with them just so I could see what all the fuss was about.
     
    #6
  7. barry

    barry Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,270
    lacoster

    Agree. Racket life these days is about 1 year, then the manufacturer discounts them, and sell the new ones at retail.
    I think Prince is going to do product consoladation. Wilson went through the same process. I like Prince but use a Wilson Surge (pro Staff), you can buy them for $50.

    I tried the new Flexpoint series from Head, and I don't think they will be around long. Not a very good racket.

    The Prince O3 is going to be a winner, already seeing a lot of them in use.

    Best buys are the older frames, they play better and are a lot cheaper!
     
    #7
  8. Hedges

    Hedges Guest

    One word: POG

    btw, why don't the TW playtesters review the POG OS and mid??
     
    #8
  9. barry

    barry Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,270
    Hedges

    Wasn't the O3 suppose to take the place of the POG? The POG has been around a long time and is a proven racket.
     
    #9
  10. Hedges

    Hedges Guest

    I have no idea; would love to see a comparison review by the playtesters or some other experts. If it is indeed an "improved POG", then I'm skeptical but interested. Even so, is it twice as good as represented by the price difference? I just picked up a new POGOS for $90. So, you can see why Prince hopes to remarket a "new improved" product in order to adjust the price to today's standards.
     
    #10
  11. bamboo

    bamboo Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    316
    I'm interested because I'm not willing to do the weight work that would let me continue to play the POG OS for three sets of fast-paced tennis. The POG OS is a sweet racquet that can be played by beginner to pro, unlike say iPrestige, but if 03 is a lot more manouverable while playing similarly, it would be worth twice as much to me
     
    #11
  12. doriancito

    doriancito Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,189
    well.....let see what i undertand of the o3 tech...... the O3 holes on the frame are to give more string power (like the woofer) and the result is more power! but what about control??
     
    #12
  13. TennisD

    TennisD Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    655
    I suppose I used the wrong terminoligy. Yes, I would hit with it, just to see if it is any good, but I don't think I would consider buying a racquet with a head bigger than 600cm2. I've found, that after switching to custom PC600s, I have trouble playin with bigger headed, and lighter racquets. I have no control with them.
     
    #13
  14. larrhall

    larrhall Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    It's my impression that Prince's 'players' racquets' were for several years mediocre at best. Even more than Wilson, they cycled through new technologies, renditions, models, etc., at an alarming rate. Prince's best contribution to the bad habits of tennis junkies in the past several years has been...shoes. Heavy, industrial, and excellent support for the tendinitis-prone. But I would like to try the 03...but only if it makes me as fast as Coria...
     
    #14
  15. Kirko

    Kirko Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,916
    glad to see you back Larry !
     
    #15
  16. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    Tennis D, my mistake, no prob. You pretty much echo my sentiments exactly. Since playing with an old Head Prestige Pro ($40 op-shop bargain lol) as much as Ive tried to convince myself that going up in headsize would be good, I just cant find anything that is comparable or -bottom line- that I play as well with. Even low powered, flexy frames still have too little control in comparison to the Prestige.

    Now, I just have to find something that will match up to the Prestige Pro. Cant get the PC 600's here but can still find the odd i-Prestige or get the new LM Prestige so guess I'll have to go to them. Otherwise I'll just be trying out all the 93sq frames on the market. Thankfully that wont take long LOL
     
    #16
  17. larrhall

    larrhall Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Thanks, Kirko. I always read your posts when I do peruse the Boards. You have a G-Star, correct?
     
    #17
  18. larrhall

    larrhall Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Andrew, I bought several Prestige 600s from Australia several years ago...Sydney. Don't know if they're still around, but it's a great shop.
     
    #18
  19. TennisD

    TennisD Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    655
    Totally agree! i.Prestiges are the closest racquets to the 600 for me...
     
    #19
  20. Kirko

    Kirko Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,916
    Larry I'm embarassed to say I've moved on to the POG longbody, but I do remember and want to thak you again for the "real deal" information on the G-Starr you gave me back in Aug. 04. Hopr you hang around for awhile you always had good concise advice on frames and tennis itself.
     
    #20

Share This Page