Prince Tournament Nylon - Good or Bad?

Discussion in 'Strings' started by Six.One.Tour.90FAN, Dec 17, 2009.

?

Prince Tournament Nylon

  1. Good(cheap, worth its money)

    11 vote(s)
    42.3%
  2. Good(I truly love it, theres nothing better)

    2 vote(s)
    7.7%
  3. Ok(Worth the money but definitely not the best)

    6 vote(s)
    23.1%
  4. Bad(Worth its money, but still awful)

    10 vote(s)
    38.5%
  5. BAD(Stay away from it, should be illegal)

    2 vote(s)
    7.7%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Six.One.Tour.90FAN

    Six.One.Tour.90FAN Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Location:
    wiltshire, uk
    At the moment, I am borrowing my coaches k90s as he is stringing mine.
    They are both strung with this string
    -It is the cheapest of the cheap.
    -Durable
    -Makes your racket feel like a saucepan....

    Although i seem to be hitting some of the most unbelieveable
    shots ever. There is NO feel whatsoever. There is NO spin whatsoever.
    There is NO power whatsoever.
    Is it the racket?
    Also...what do you guys think it's like.
     
    #1
  2. Kick Serve 14

    Kick Serve 14 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,021
    well... that racket does give you NO power, but it is most likely the strings, tournament nylon, is cheap, and not playable. what string do you normally use? That might help answer your question better...
     
    #2
  3. Six.One.Tour.90FAN

    Six.One.Tour.90FAN Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Location:
    wiltshire, uk
    Its in my signature.....
     
    #3
  4. Kick Serve 14

    Kick Serve 14 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,021
    probably the strings, in my experience, MSV is very spin friendly...
     
    #4
  5. DE19702

    DE19702 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    194
    I bought two identical Prince Diablo mids. One came with the Prince Tournament Nylon 15 and I had the other strung with Babolat Xcel Power because of the recommendations on this board. The Prince is noticeably better in my opinion. The Babolat is stiff and lacks the control of the Prince. Go figure.
     
    #5
  6. scotus

    scotus Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,624
    Were the two strung at the same tension on the same machine?
     
    #6
  7. DE19702

    DE19702 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    194
    Both were strung by different vendors but were supposed to be strung at the same (mid) tension. The rackets were new. I thought the Xcel was strung higher but I have no way to tell. That's why I'm going to learn how to string my own rackets.
     
    #7
  8. scotus

    scotus Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,624
    Well, that makes it difficult to judge the strings.

    Let's say the Prince Nylon was strung on a Prince NEO without any prestretching or with prestretching by hand.

    And let's say your Babolat Xcel was strung on a Babolat Star electronic machine and was prestretched by machine.

    Even if the reference tension was the same, the second will produce a much stiffer stringbed.
     
    #8
  9. Irvin

    Irvin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,101
    Location:
    Marietta, Ga
    I think the string is worth the money but everyone will not I can tell you. I have no idea what the pro's rackets are but you may want to try the nylon in one of your racket to see if you like it. Just because someone likes or dislikes a string does not mean you will feel the same.

    Experiment!

    Irvin
     
    #9
  10. DE19702

    DE19702 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    194
    If that's the case (which I am not necessarily disagreeing with), then no one can really say anything about any string and how you string is just as, if not more important that what you string.
     
    #10
  11. scotus

    scotus Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,624
    Actually, it's not too difficult to compare strings.

    Take your strings to the same stringer and have them strung at the same tension on the same machine (and on same model racquets). The prestretching option, whether you choose to do it or not, should be applied equally to both strings.

    With everything being equal, you can now say something definitive about the string stiffness.

    Fortunately for me, I own a stringing machine, so it's easy for me to make comparisons.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2009
    #11
  12. kcmiser

    kcmiser Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    199
    I think this is a good string to experiment with, particularly in hybrids. I find it has a dead feel compared to normal synthetic gut, and has lower power than synth' gut, but is more consistent across the stringbed (that's very big for me). It isn't particularly fun to hit with (no real 'wow' moments), but it's really predictable, which I really like. It's also slightly softer than most synthetic guts, which is a factor for some.

    I think it's a little underrated, but I wouldn't suggest anyone run out and buy it because of the price. Don't by a $180 racquet, then pick your string based on its being a buck or two cheaper than another sting.
     
    #12
  13. Six.One.Tour.90FAN

    Six.One.Tour.90FAN Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,030
    Location:
    wiltshire, uk
    I agree with the above but does anyone actually use the string
    in matches or so? It just ruins the whole experience of playing tennis,
    I got my normal racquets back anyway so I'm playing
    much better(Thank God).
     
    #13

Share This Page