Pro Staff 6.0 Original 85 less powerful than Prestige Classic mid?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by djones, Jan 9, 2006.

  1. djones

    djones Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,783
    I wonder, which one is more powerful.
    The Wilson has just a tiny tiny smaller headsize, only a little shorter, but just as wide as the Prestige, but it is also a lot stiffer.

    So would there really be a difference in power?
     
    #1
  2. Marius_Hancu

    Marius_Hancu G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    17,843
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    read the Industry data which I posted in the Comparative Reviews Sticky
    those are pretty good in terms of power

    LM Prestige and 6.0 85 are really close there
    thus I assume the same to be valid for the PC.

    but subjective observations differ.
     
    #2
  3. Deuce

    Deuce Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,270
    Location:
    A not so parallel universe...
    The Prestige Classic had sort of a 'hidden power spot' on it. That's the only thing I didn't like about it.

    On the Pro Staff 6.0 85, I never felt this.

    The Prestige is the more comfortable of the two - but the Pro Staff is far from uncomfortable - unless you miss the sweet spot.
     
    #3
  4. Speedy_tennis

    Speedy_tennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    509
    i think pc 600 is less powerfull
     
    #4
  5. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,322
    PS 6.0 85 feels more powerful, heavier, an open string pattern, and stiffer.
     
    #5

Share This Page