pros using thin beam racquets

Discussion in 'Pros' Racquets and Gear' started by radical1, Jan 25, 2005.

  1. radical1

    radical1 New User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    26
    anyone notice some of the pros using very thin beam racquets? coria and fed i believe are using 16mm frames. anyone know the benefits of a very thin frame? and anyone know what the thinniest frames that are available for public purchase?
     
  2. Noelle

    Noelle Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,771
    Guillermo Canas is also using a thin beam racquet.
     
  3. BLiND

    BLiND Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,615
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    you can get a LOT more spin from a thin beam frame
     
  4. degreefanlindi

    degreefanlindi Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    thin beams

    I can't say I blame them...thin beams are ideal I think.
     
  5. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,890
    Are you suggesting a thin racquet would offer more spin and/or play better than a wider frame with, say, the same flex rating? Why would that be? (let's assume one could generate comparable head speed with both, noting that at sub-sonic speed, pointier objects are NOT more aerodynamic, which is why race cars and airliners are curved rather than pointed in front).
    ________
    Glass bubblers
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
  6. BLiND

    BLiND Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,615
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Because with a thin beam, you can hit a much more severe brushing angle for spin shots, without the ball hitting the beam.
     
  7. Mies

    Mies Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Messages:
    273
    I seriously doubt whether a 30 mm beam would make you frame more shots than a 16mm beam considering how "closed" your racket face would have to be for the frame to actually interfere with the path of the ball. A ball framed with a 30 mm beam would probably be a serious mishit with a 16 mm beam as well, even if it hit the stringbed.

    It can be calculated of course, if someone feels like it (considering this written at 16.47 local time and my working day is nearly finished, I'm not gonna do it :).....)
     
  8. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,890
    Exactly. Take a look at still photos of heavy topspin players (abundant photos on web during AO) and you'll see that the racquet's angle of attack on the ball leaves PLENTY of margin for a wide frame, not even close to contacting the ball with the frame.
    ________
    Light Bulb Vaporizer Review
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
  9. hummer23

    hummer23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,558
    case and and point, andy roddick
     
  10. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,137
    Not sure if a thin beam cures all ills, fewer mishits yes but picked up a few thin beams that vibrated like a tuning fork.
     
  11. BLiND

    BLiND Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,615
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    I disagree... I frame more shots with thick beam racquets.

    Also... Andy rodick hits fairly flat, he's not a spin artist... players like, Hewit, Coria, Federer all have <21mm beams. There will be some exceptions but thinker beams are more prone to framing.
     
  12. netpunk

    netpunk Guest

    Do thinker frames figure out the best shot? Or is it a hybrid of a thin frame and a thick one? Please, tell me!
     
  13. splink779

    splink779 Guest

     
  14. deflori

    deflori Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    482
    most use thin beams,the only rackets i noticed is the pure drive team and the head instinct on the atp circuit,which are thicker...
     
  15. perfmode

    perfmode Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,767

    You don't know anything, do you?

    If you hit the sweetspot, the frame doesn't matter. There's no way in hell you can shank a ball hit in the COP.
     
  16. perfmode

    perfmode Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,767
     
  17. hummer23

    hummer23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,558
    does coria really use a very thin frame stick? i thought the POG was 19mm or so thick? he has something specially made then?
     
  18. charles_boey

    charles_boey Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    I think thin beams flex more and offer a more traditional feel. You can get more spin cause the frame cups the ball longer.
    Boxed frames also offer more flex than compared to oval cross section frames.
    As for framing balls.. i suppose it's very obvious during mishits. take 2 identical mid sized racket frames and the one with a thicker beam will suffer the consequenses more.
    in the case of Pure drives.. i don't see the problem of framing cause it has a generous 100sq in hitting area
    now if wilson were to make a 30mm frame for a 85sq...that'd be something.
     
  19. Underhanded

    Underhanded New User

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    25
    Wider beamed racquets tend be made of stiffer composites than the more flexible thinned framed sticks. Which leads me to a quote taken from the Tennis Warehouse racquet guide, "A lesser known effect of frame stiffness is the amount of spin that can be generated. Generally speaking, stiffer racquets provide less spin than flexible racquets because the ball leaves the stringbed more quickly."
     
  20. gmlasam

    gmlasam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,527
    That explains why the POG is such a fantastic spin monster. It's beam is 19 width.
     
  21. hummer23

    hummer23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,558
    no sir, the pog isnt a good spin frame because of its beam, but rather because of the very open string pattern. the wid has just 14 mains. the prestige calssic, same head size, has 18 mains by contrast. the thin beam does make hte frame more flexible, which holds the ball on hte stringbed a littel bit longer, but the prestige also is a flexible frame. the main differnce between the POg and other frames of same head size that determines how much spin the produce, is string pattern.
     
  22. gmlasam

    gmlasam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,527
    Yes, but having a thin beam and an open string pattern contributes to the POG's very high spin potential. Comparing the POG with the Prestige, the POG would have greater spin potential overall because of the open string pattern and thin beam combination.
     
  23. hummer23

    hummer23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,558
    they are both 19mm frames, both standard leanth. the only variables taht are different are weight and string pattern, as head size is also the same. there is no doubt that the POG is more spin friendly, and because thier frames have the same width, the string pattern is the reason for this. if youve ever strung a POG mid, you know just how easy it is, takes 15 minutes if you dont rush.
     
  24. charles_boey

    charles_boey Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    sorry but i have to go with splink776 on this one..

    http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=52064976&cdi=0
    http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=52064920&cdi=0
    http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=52064922&cdi=0
    from the pictures...it's impossible to hit a flat ball with his arm curved like that.

    that sounds like spin to me... :)
     
  25. gmlasam

    gmlasam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,527
    Yes he uses a full western grip. Such grip is known for its extreme topspin potential. Brushing up on a ball from low to high equals spin.
     
  26. charles_boey

    charles_boey Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    not to mention...u really need to impart spin while using Pure Drives.
    it's kind like a way of hitting that is required while using Pure Drives. flat strokes just don't cut it.
    that's why spinmasters..ie the Spanish players and claycourt specialist prefer a racket that can generate more spin. in other words..no spin no money.
     
  27. BLiND

    BLiND Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,615
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    I still think Andy doesn't use spin half as much as those players I mentioned... with the babs, charles is right... because they have a much larger head (100") than most, they won't suffer so much... if they had a 90", with their beams, they would be horrible to hit heavy spin with. Can anyone think of a Mid size frame with 21mm> beam?

    So, I guess, we should say, its not just the beam, its the head size, beam, and string density. All I am saying is that thinner beams are better for lots of spin... but not the be-all and end-all in spin!
     
  28. Ash_Smith

    Ash_Smith Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,851
    Location:
    A green and pleasant land
    Does anybody remember or even use those Wilson Spin framed rackets from about 10 years ago, they were never released in the UK (I don't think so anyway) but I bought a couple from Spain. I found one in the garage the other day, think I used it between the ages of 13-16, completely forgot I still had it. The premise there was that the thin beam would present greater potential for spin, I used to hit okay with it as I remeber. The frame is similar in dimensions to a thin piece of dowling.
     
  29. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,137
    Wilson Hammer 5.5 w/15mm beam.
     
  30. winks

    winks Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    279
    True dat.

    Wilson 5.5 Hammer Spin - This from the "thin frame racquets" thread going on right now on the racquets forum. There are several posts on this racquet...
    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=39408

    And (just in) here "thinnest racquet ever"...
    http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=39496.

    I think beam width is very important and IMO thinner beam = easier to impart more spin on the ball. I think it would be useful if TW added beam-width to their racquet-search parameters.
     

Share This Page