RDS 002 vs TFlash 310 vs APDC

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by rayallen333, Jun 5, 2008.

  1. rayallen333

    rayallen333 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    Anyone tried these racquets and can give a comparison? thanks.
     
    #1
  2. rayallen333

    rayallen333 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    bump anyone?
     
    #2
  3. rayallen333

    rayallen333 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    bump?
    10char
     
    #3
  4. Justus_Jonas

    Justus_Jonas New User

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    65
    I played with the apd (non cortex) and now with the tflash 310 (never hit with the rds002).

    The only thing i can tell you, test the tflash.
    I switched to it immediatly. It is very solid, much more Feel (in my opinion) than the apd and easier to move (much space for customazation), you dont feel the 310gr.

    And for me, much more control.

    cons: service, you have the same accuracy with it, but with little less power than apd. (not used to play with lead tape so far )

    I string my tflash 310 with x-one biphase 1,24 and i highly recomm. it for the apd users who whants a more solid feel (in some case more direct feel) an a better volley frame with enough power for pace shots.

    thx thomas

    PS: sorry for my bad english
     
    #4
  5. Il Mostro

    Il Mostro Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    3,079
    Location:
    Sunny SoCal
    I echo JJ's recommendation. I've made several posts recently regarding the TFlash 310. My only difference from JJ's experience is that I find the 310 very accurate on serves. Even though my heaviest balls come with the APDC, the 310 is no slouch in the power department. I just ordered 2 more and was told by my local distributor that TF had only 3 of these left before my order. I am sure there are more out there, but since TF is introducing its new stuff right now, supplies are not large. The TFlash 315 VO2 Max will be the replacement for the 310. I like this stick so much, I may pick up another to stash away.
     
    #5
  6. Tallahassee_Technifibre

    Tallahassee_Technifibre Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    151
    Personally i have not hit w/ the other rackets except the Tflash 310 I WOULD NOT HIGHLY suggest that racket.The T-Flash has to much pop and tends to go out more often.
    I personally am more fond of the T-Fight models. If you lean more towards baseline I WOULD USE T-fight models since overall they can be used well at the net or extremely useful for keeping balls in at the baseline.
    Also if you like a classic racket feel go for the T-fight 325 instead of any of the t-flash with is a very volley prone racket and feels instable from the baseline. T-fight 320 since tends to add more spin and will often leave flat ball hitters(or those that hit both) with their balls hitting 1- 1 1/2 feet deep. I suggest either T-fight 325 or t-fight 335 if you hit more often from baseline and the T-flash 310 if you come in alot or play quite a bit of doubles.
     
    #6
  7. rayallen333

    rayallen333 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    Anyone try the RDS 002?
     
    #7
  8. lolza

    lolza New User

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    63
    i own a rds 002 (non tour)
    very solid racquet on the groundies, produces lots of spin, great serve, very solid volleys and near perfect control

    i put some lead at around 9, 12 and 3 o clock

    hope that helps
     
    #8
  9. rayallen333

    rayallen333 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    lolza, can you compare the 002 to any common racquet?
     
    #9

Share This Page