RE: Sampras vs Federer: No he didn't let him win. 100% sure

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by Sanyi, Dec 5, 2007.

  1. Sanyi

    Sanyi Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    63
    no way, in the 1st match he was visibly tired in the 2nd set, couldn't do nothing about it. If you don't think he was tired, I must ask the question: "do you have eyes?"

    the 2nd match was very tight, but if he were gonna let him win, I would think he would want a 3rd set. He seemed to be having fun but even in these types of "meaningless" matches, it's still hard to lose a tiebreak.

    the 3rd match in Macao he could've also made it go to a 3rd set but was worried about Federer coming back and winning and so took no chances and closed out the match proper.

    end of story
     
    #1
  2. nickb

    nickb Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,292
    erm Fed let him win...
     
    #2
  3. FedForGOAT

    FedForGOAT Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    921
    OP, you seem to be under the impression that people think sampras let federer win. It's the other way around. Also, please use evidence to support your arguments not just "do you have eyes?".
     
    #3

Share This Page