Roger must utilize the "true S&V" to stand a chance

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tennis-hero, May 16, 2009.

  1. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    uk
    not S&V every point

    but, whenever he drags Nadal out wide, he ghosts in, prime Fed style and catches the CC shot

    if Federer can hit Nadal with the power of the "true S&V" then he will bagel Nadal

    100%

    otherwise it will be another 1 dimensional performance from MR PERCENTAGE BASELINE LEFT HANDED TOPSPIN TENNIS
     
    #1
  2. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,551
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I think it could work if Federer puts the work in, but it will never, ever work when Roger is not serving at around 70% on the first serve.

    The serve is what's key and when Roger locates it it allows him to come in with more confidence and put away volleys with greater ease.

    Roger won't win on the volley alone.
     
    #2
  3. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    uk
    i would say 75-80% first serves

    but Roger should also take a page out of Novak's book

    ATTACK THE 2ND SERVE ROG!

    its not that strong, its ok to give it a whack

    don't be passive, he'll wear you down with his top spin and out last you if you play his game
     
    #3
  4. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,623
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Short points will make Nadal fresher.
     
    #4
  5. prosealster

    prosealster Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,003
    i think fed wont win full stop :) nad just has too much game and confidence at the moment
     
    #5
  6. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    uk
    why haven't you contributed on my "Nadal timecapsule" thread

    i miss you there :cry:

    :roll:
     
    #6
  7. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,697
    Nobody's gonna wear him down on clay, so who cares?

    Federer's only chance on clay against him is to hit through him, so I'd say this is a good tactic.

    Federer served at close to 70% today, so he might have a chance tomorrow.
     
    #7
  8. Jchurch

    Jchurch Guest

    I think Federer will have to play short quick points and hit the corners to win.
     
    #8
  9. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    "True S&V" isn't gonna work. It's too dependent on the serve, which isn't Federer's bread n' butter shot. Besides, Nadal's passing shots are great and he can track down almost any shot on clay. He's too fast and too clay-suited to be beaten by S&V. I do agree that the 2nd serve should be the focus of attack against Nadal. But the true key here is for Federer to win the mental battle against Nadal, which is no easy task.
     
    #9
  10. GameSampras

    GameSampras Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,687
    Fed would have to put seriously work into it and I dont think he is willing to do so. Hes been "baselining it" for far too long.
     
    #10
  11. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,551
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Will never happen.

    Some guys serve that high, but they sacrifice velocity and placement.
     
    #11
  12. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    I think it's more of a matter of attacking Nadal's serve than doing S&V. And also, if he can stop himself from spraying so many forehands, it'll help tons.
     
    #12
  13. WhiskeyEE

    WhiskeyEE Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    5,872
    Sampras, the best Serve and volleyer of all time, didn't have good success on claycourt using S and V. Federer isn't nearly as good at it and he'd be trying it against a better clay courter and someone with better passing shots than Sampras ever played. The only way he can win is if he's mentally strong the entire match and plays his best baseline game.

    Nothing wrong with S and V every now and then. But on clay, against Nadal, if it worked he would've done it already.
     
    #13
  14. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,567
    I need to paste this post in every time someone brings up this topic:

    Edberg on Federer:

    "He's not going to beat Nadal from the back of the court. Hardly anybody does. To beat him I think he needs to reshape his game a little bit." Stefan Edberg

    "In order to develop and become an even better player his strategy should be to play more serve-and-volley," Stefan Edberg said. "I think that would benefit him and it would make it easier to beat Nadal, though that's never easy of course.

    "It takes time. It's not as though you can switch on and change your style suddenly. You have to do it over six months or a year, playing a lot of serve-and-volley to get your momentum and so that at the back of your mind you know what you're doing."
     
    #14
  15. Chelsea_Kiwi

    Chelsea_Kiwi Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,526
    Not Roddick, though he is missing the "V" in S&V.
     
    #15
  16. LanceStern

    LanceStern Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,329
    Have you guys seen Nadal's passing shots?

    Fed commented on S&V, but even he said something along the lines it's awfully hard to volley against someone who hits the best passing shots.

    Nadal has got so much spin and speed he can pass people 80-90% of the time. Even when off balance, or sprinting It's ridiculous.
     
    #16
  17. kaiotic

    kaiotic Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    269
    again, case in point of how easily Fed took the fourth set of the AO 09 Final.
    Mats Wilander has been saying this for like three or four years. easier said than done.. Edberg is realistic in that it takes 6-12 months..
     
    #17
  18. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    uk
    he actually pulled it off

    the power of the "true S&V" has been vindicated
     
    #18

Share This Page