Round Robin system - good or bad

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by AsgerHO, Mar 2, 2007.

?

What is your opinion of the Round Robin system?

Poll closed Mar 9, 2007.
  1. Great idea

    6 vote(s)
    6.8%
  2. Bad idea - old system back

    80 vote(s)
    90.9%
  3. Other opinion - please tell below

    2 vote(s)
    2.3%
  1. AsgerHO

    AsgerHO Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    Aarhus, Denmark
    I guess this topic has been discussed before, but I haven´t been able to find the right place to put this post, so I hope it´s ok.

    I would simply like to know what you think of the RR-system.

    Personally I´m against it, and I´d like to hand out my arguments

    First of all, and IMO the most obvious argument is that the great thing about tournaments is that if you have just one bad match, you´re out.
    This is what creates the big upsets - you can´t afford to loose a match, and still proceed in the tournament.

    Secondly it has become much more difficult for the players who are just below the players who´s directly into the round robin stage, to get in the main draw.

    Actually the qualifiers have to, not only go through the whole qualification, but after winning 3 or 4 matches in the QD, they are facing a much tougher opponent in the Main Draw elimination round, and there is a great risc that they´ll loose that match.

    I know that some of the arguments for the RR system is that you will get more matches, and more excitement, but well I have to say that I really don´t agree on that. First of all, most matches isn´t that interesting in the RR-stage. Mostly there is one really good player, and two players who are not that great - no bad words for the other players, but it´s not as interesting as watching a "normal" tournament, where you can watch the draw, and see who is going to face who later on etc.

    What made me do this post was that I´ve just read that in the Las Vegas tournament, James Blake has just proceeded to the QF´s without winning one single match.
    He lost his first RR match to Eyvgeny Korolev, quite convincing, and then the 3rd player in the respective group pulled out (not sure if it was because of an injury or something else). But originally matches which has not been started, and is regarded as a wlakover does not count in the group, and therefore Korolev should have been through to the QF´s, because he beat Blake.

    But somehow the ATP was able to find a rule-change, which made the "win" for Blake count in the group, and suddenly Blake is trhough to the QF´s. (which means that Korolev must have lost his match to the by now unknown player)

    IMO that is what should convince everyone about the fact that the RR system does not work as it should. And I´d like to speak a word for getting the normal system back in EVERY tournament.

    What do you guys think?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2007
    #1
  2. RedKat

    RedKat Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    110
    Round Robin seems to more fair to me. It eliminates a factor of luck, having a bad day etc. and even manipulating the draw on purpose. Imagine facing Fed in the first round? Bad luck. You always hear comments from players like "I had a tough draw" or "he had an easy draw" etc. I think for this reason end year Masters played by RR
     
    #2
  3. caulcano

    caulcano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    RR is designed so that top players advances.

    It's even more of a bad idea if it causes controvesy, ala Blake.
     
    #3
  4. AsgerHO

    AsgerHO Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    Aarhus, Denmark
    But isn´t it the beauty about the game of tennis, concerning the touraments. That if you have a bad day, and everyone has, then you´re out.
    That´s the way it should be - so you have a tough draw, just bad luck, live with it. You might have a better draw in the next tournament.

    I think it´s acceptable in the Masters Cup, because the collect the 8 best players of the year to compete, so it´s 8 great players, facing each other, instead of no. 8 in the world faces no. 84 and 112 - if you understand what I mean.
     
    #4
  5. DueSouth

    DueSouth Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    England
    Just quoting myself from another thread this is what I think:

     
    #5
  6. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,498
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    I have to say, I totally agree with your points AsgerHO.
    Upsets are part of the excitement of tournaments, and Blake getting through while Korolev going out is ridiculous.
     
    #6
  7. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    Where is the option for "it sucks" ?
     
    #7
  8. Bical

    Bical New User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    89
    Location:
    Santa fe
    Sucks.

    Back to older system !
     
    #8
  9. ATXtennisaddict

    ATXtennisaddict Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,278
    The only ppl who want the RR system are the ppl paying for tickets to see their favorite players. And of course, the losers on tour.
     
    #9
  10. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    bullsh!t is what I consider that RR
     
    #10
  11. croatian sensation

    croatian sensation Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,084
    I guess, but if you are a real tennis fan, then you know there is an option your fav player might lose before you get to see him. So, who would support a disgraceful system that is ruining the sport they supposedly love, just so that their ticket pays off?!

    RR sucks!!!!
     
    #11
  12. oscar_2424

    oscar_2424 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,239
    Location:
    Hallandale, Florida
    i second this
     
    #12
  13. CanadianChic

    CanadianChic Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,302
    Location:
    CowTown
    I do not like RR at all. That's all I really can say.
     
    #13
  14. c_zimma

    c_zimma Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    435
    It takes away from the game of tennis. Tennis is so special because if you do have an off day, you are done. Thats great in my opinion. If you are tired or sick or whatever, that's your problem. If you're out, you're out. And like someone mentioned above, the RR system is bound to cause problems, like in Blake's situation.
     
    #14
  15. kevhen

    kevhen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,405
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    RR is ok if you just have a small group of players like 4-8 players, but the big problem is deciding tiebreaks and using games won and lost as the decider especially if players get injured or just tank matches to let a buddy through (possibly they could be splitting the cash behind the scenes, collusion).
     
    #15
  16. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    Round Robins: the players don't like them, the tennis-watching public don't like them (stuffed if I know where the ATP dug up their respondents), but the tournament promoters love them.

    Guess we can see (as if we didn't already know) who the ATP is working for.
     
    #16
  17. supertennis

    supertennis New User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    60
    the players don't like them bad idea
     
    #17
  18. ctbmar

    ctbmar Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    500
    #18
  19. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    In a few words:
    first Korolev advanced with the decision of the ATP supervisor Marc Darby and accordin to THE RULES OF RR.Then De Villiers overruled the decision and put Blake through "because it was commonsense and he would have won HAD the match be finished",and they tried to shut up Korolev with some money bonus.It turned out that De Villiers according to the rules of ATP itself,didnt' have the authority to overrule that decision,so the ATP changed its mind again and Korolev advanced.The CEO had to publicly admit that he screwed up and the good thing from this disgrace is that it is most probably the end of RR itself.The end.
     
    #19
  20. OnceWas

    OnceWas Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    134
    RR format does not belong in Professional tennis.
     
    #20
  21. BlackSheep

    BlackSheep Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    Chi-town
    Very bad idea....proved by the TCO.
     
    #21
  22. kevhen

    kevhen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,405
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    I think RR is a bad idea but if they are going to use then they should see how other sports use it. Soccer has round robin in World Cup with the top 2 teams from each group of 4 moving on. So there is only one scenario where teams wouldn't be fighting for a spot to move on going into the last round.

    Another format I heard from a volleyball player is to have 4 team round robins but no team is eliminated but after the round robin, teams are then seeded.

    Round Robins in my opinion shouldn't be used unless you have 8 or less players in a draw.
     
    #22
  23. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,769
    Round robin is doomed says Federer...BBC

    Round-robin is doomed - Federer

    Federer has never been in favour of the round-robin system
    World number one Roger Federer has predicted that the men's tour will be forced to abandon the controversial round-robin system in tournaments.
    His comments come after James Blake went out of the Las Vegas Open following a mix-up over the rules.

    "I doubt it's going to happen next year, the round-robin system," Federer said. "I think it's a bad situation."

    The Association of Tennis Professionals will discuss the round-robin format at a board meeting on 22 March.

    The round-robin trial has been introduced at some tournaments in 2007 in an attempt to boost interest from the media and sponsors and to give spectators more chance of seeing the big names of the sport in action.

    However, the format has been criticised and the confusion in Las Vegas, which follows a similar situation in Buenos Aires, has intensified opposition.

    If some good can come out of it, the revamping or destruction of the round-robin system, then that is something

    James Blake

    Blake had needed to win his final round-robin match in straight sets with the loss of no more than five games to secure a quarter-final place but his opponent's retirement during the match denied him that chance.

    ATP chief executive Etienne de Villiers stepped in to announce that Blake would be allowed through to the last eight, only to make a U-turn 24 hours later.

    Federer added: "It's going to be interesting to see their (the ATP's) reaction now because they're definitely under pressure.

    "Everybody knows I was against it (the round-robin system) in the first place.

    "It's actually very disappointing to see things like this had to happen first before you realise that the system is not going to work."

    Blake himself said he understood the decision to eliminate him from the tournament but called on the ATP to look at changing the rules.

    "If some good can come out of it - the revamping or destruction of the round-robin system - then that is something," he said.

    "It seriously needs to be looked at. We're going to run into situations every single week."
     
    #23
  24. fr600

    fr600 New User

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    52
    It's really not good.
     
    #24
  25. Camilio Pascual

    Camilio Pascual Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,825
    Hilarious!
    Definitely a bad idea in most aspects.
    However, tournament sponsors and casual fans probably like it.
     
    #25

Share This Page