Sean Hannity Vs Usta

Discussion in 'Junior League & Tournament Talk' started by HIGH-TECH TENNIS, Jun 26, 2012.

  1. kme5150

    kme5150 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    250
    You do if you want to play the best players and you live in a weak section. You need to remember that everybody doesn't live in FL. Not every area has a place like Cambier Park in Naples where there are top juniors, former college, and pros to hit with at any time.

    I agree, I wish there were 4 Supers and that was it. Make the draws 512 and play 2 matches a day or make it a 128 draw and have a 4 round qualifier. The cream would rise to the top.
     
    #51
  2. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Best suggestion I've heard here in a long time.
     
    #52
  3. TenAll

    TenAll New User

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    15
    I have a 10 and 7 year old, both playing since the age of 5. Older one going to her first SuperNational next month. I am very much worked up over this issue.

    Kids my age are most affected by these proposed changes, IMHO.
     
    #53
  4. li0scc0

    li0scc0 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,173
    You missed calling him a racist (of course given your rant you would have spelled it 'racits!!1!'. Need to work on your vitriol to get it right. Always next time.
     
    #54
  5. MarTennis

    MarTennis Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    270
    I'm down with the message...

    ...I'm not gonna argue with people about the changes, too much real work and tennis work to be done.
     
    #55
  6. MarTennis

    MarTennis Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    270
    Why...

    The 10 year old has two years to become the best and make the issue moot. Our children have plenty of time to totally take over the 12s, hard work and God Willing.
     
    #56
  7. kme5150

    kme5150 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    250
    I wish I could take credit for it.

    The sad part is that it was brought up and told it was a terrible idea. The USTA Junior Competition Committee said they wanted the National Championships to feel more like professional tournaments. Every professional tournament that I know of has a qualifier.
     
    #57
  8. WARPWOODIE

    WARPWOODIE Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    369
    A qualifier would take another day or two to complete. That is more money to consider for lodging, food, and other considerations. At these levels, junior tennis for the 10-12 year old is not for the faint of heart.
     
    #58
  9. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Only 4 super nationals would be less days across a year. I'd only hold them for 14, 16, and 18.
     
    #59
  10. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    I'm actually not opposed to a concept along these line. I suspect you are being sarcastic with the 512 draw size, but conceptually, fewer tournaments, but equally distributed throughout the year, with larger draws(not smaller) and two matches per day and two day qualifier. The qualifier only extends the tournament for those who have to play it. Schedule the final for Monday, only two kids have to change there flight plans.
     
    #60
  11. sundaypunch

    sundaypunch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,660
    I think the guy is an assclown also. Don't be naive though, he has reached a very wide audience with his commentary. You hate the guy yet feel compelled to repeatedly comment on the issue here.

    He has people talking about the issue which was exactly his intent.
     
    #61
  12. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    He should keep his day job.
     
    #62
  13. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787
    You really think he's a racist? I've never gotten that impression from him.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2012
    #63
  14. BMC9670

    BMC9670 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,013
    I don't see why everyone looks to the USTA to "produce" the next American champion anyway, and I don't know why they think they can. They never have. Past great American champions have come from varying unique circumstances - not a "system". They may have entered an academy or been helped by the USTA, but not from scratch. Not even close.

    Look around at the top players. Look at history. Tennis champions come from a spark, a talent, and an environment that encourages it from an early age, be it a private coach, a crazy tennis parent, or a pro-athlete uncle, etc, there is very little "system" to it.
     
    #64
  15. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    Wow. You obviously have not read what he wrote or payed any attention to what numerous other people have written. You are way to busy dealing in stereo types of "insane tennis" parents and making wild suppositions about other people motives and intentions without any evidence.

    let me spell it out : Hannity does not believe his children will be professional tennis players. He says this in plain English, you either choose not to read what he wrote or just assume everything he writes is a lie. Neither do I believe mine will be. Neither do most of the people who object to the schedule change. I don't believe my children tennis skills have anything to do with the USTA, for better or worse.

    It's actually precisely because of this that we object to the change in the scheduleThe makers of the new schedule appear to believe that national competition is only appropriate for very, very top echelon of players who they feel have pro potential. Everyone else should just stay in there region and not bother the truly elite. The unneeded presence of the inferiors a these national events is costing the really good players too much time and too much money. We believe this attitude is wrong. Just as 99% of the kids who play in the little league world series will never play in MLB, we believe it is ok for kids who will never be pro's to participate in national competition. We believe regardless of the result, it is an experience for them worth having. Junior tennis is a childhood experience, it's not a minor league for the ATP.

    It seems to me some of the proponents of the schedule change seem to be the one who will benefit from it. With kids already ranked in the top 10, they can still go to the national events anyhow, but now can pretty much stay in Florida or SoCal, do not have to travel to Arizona at Christmas to defend a ranking, and when they do travel it will be a couple days shorter becuase they don't have to deal with the riff-raff.
     
    #65
  16. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    While it isn't popular here, I admire your perspective. And I think you are right, Hannity is completely consumed with junior tennis.
     
    #66
  17. Leelord337

    Leelord337 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,911
    Location:
    univ houston courts
    I love this quote from Hannity in that article.

    "They also learn that sometimes life is not fair and there are those who do not "play by the rules." They are put in situations like being down 2-5, 15-40 in the 3rd set and then find out they can fight their way back. You can’t get that kind of education in a classroom. All of these are GREAT lessons for life. "
     
    #67
  18. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787
    It's one of the great lessons people learn from sports. Tennis included.

    So important for kids to experience that when growing up. Need more kids experiencing that on the tennis court. And tennis is one of the few sports that you can continue to be inspired by like that throughout life when you aren't a kid anymore. One of the few things we can all probably agree on.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2012
    #68
  19. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787
    I fully understand all this, and you stated the point well here. And I mostly agree.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2012
    #69
  20. LeftyServe

    LeftyServe Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    550
    And two years ago, the USTA was saying that 12's tournaments are not critical and the 10-12 group should not be focused on nationals, blah, blah, blah. Now it seems they're saying, or at least implying, that the kids need to to be top-ranked in 12's to even get the opportunity to play in Level 1 and Level 2 tournaments in the older age groups.
     
    #70
  21. rolliges

    rolliges New User

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    Florida
    While I object to the USTA's heavy handedness and feel a lot of young kids will miss out on prime development opportunities by fewer high-level competition (especially in regions with deep talent pools), it is possible that there is a way to improve the system.

    Some countries have A,B,& C groups within an age level at National tournaments. The A's are elite and so on. That way everyone who wants to can compete, earn some points, stimulate the economy, and most importantly, develop as tennis players.
     
    #71
  22. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Spot on that pushing the talent back down a level raises the competitive bar. What riddles me is... Why don't the majority of the tennis parents see it this way?
     
    #72
  23. Mitch Bridge

    Mitch Bridge Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Because the qualifying spots from the sections are not fair. There are players that coulddo well at nationals that will not make those tournaments now because of the smaller draws. With the old system, players could hussle up L3 points to make up for the inequality of the sectional with national points tournaments. Now they are out of a way to balance the ranking system, which is completely off base. Socal's 100th ranked player is better than the 10th best player in 10 of the 17 USTA sections. This section should have 20% of the national spots in order to equalize the system. When you drop down to a 64 draw, the tournaments are still going to have weak players that make the field that 100s of other players could beat, thus making it an unfair system. Larger draws made up for this, and allowed all of the better players a fair chance to excel....if it is not broken don't fix it! The old system was an excellent system whereas birthdays didn't matter, and the inequity of the sections didn't really matter either. Now the sectional imbalance is the major issue. This system only works if you have 5 regions instead of the sections. Florida,Socal, west, central and east with equal qualifying spots.
     
    #73
  24. tennisforlife77

    tennisforlife77 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Tenniseurope runs 322 individual junior tournaments across Europe each year. These do not include junior events sanctioned by individual countries. Compare this to the less than 20 national events sanctioned by the USTA. The access to high level competition in Europe for juniors is almost unlimited - 4-5 events per week to choose from. The same 200-300 kids in the US are going to be competing with each other over and over again as part of the limited national schedule. In my opinion it is hard to imagine a more short sighted approach to developing tennis in the US
     
    #74
  25. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    More national tournaments so the elites like Hannity can fly their kids to tournaments every weekend is not the solution. We need more kids playing the game closer to home, not further away. We do need kids playing matches everyday and you don't need a tournament to do that. We need less blaming of the system and more parents taking direct responsibility.
     
    #75
  26. tennisforlife77

    tennisforlife77 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    I think you need to get over the fact that Sean Hannity wrote the letter. His views are representative of not all but a significant percentage of the junior tennis constituency. If you are going to restrict national playing opportunities to the extent the USTA has done with their new schedule you had better make sure you have a really accurate selection process. Random sectional quotas don't seem to be the way to go. What Europe is offering in terms of high level competitive opportunities for juniors is on a totally different scale with a completely different philosophy ie make high level competition as accessible as possible to as many players as you can. The results speak for themselves - Europe has 8 out of the worlds top 10 players and 75 of the top 100. For the US the numbers are 1 and 7.
     
    #76
  27. justinmadison

    justinmadison Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    525
    My son played US national tournaments before we moved to Europe last summer. After moving to Europe I was absolutely amazed at the number and quality of national, European, and ITF tournaments available for him to play. After being exposed to both systems it quickly becomes apparent that access to more high level tennis and tournaments equals improved performance. Not that surprising.

    I do not think there is a significant contingent of national players or parents in favor of the changes made by the USTA. It is remarkable to see how united parents and players are in opposition to the USTA’s plans.

    I don’t know much about Sean’s politics but at least he is willing to say “My name is Sean Hannity I have kids who aspire to be national players and I believe these changes are bad because …” It is very rare to find anyone who will state “My name is … and I have kids who aspire to be national players and I believe these changes are good because …” Very rare.
     
    #77
  28. Mitch Bridge

    Mitch Bridge Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    If the system is to blame then blame the system. In a country of our size it is going to be logistically challenging therefore more expensive to compete. Flying to national events as often as possible is the solution. Playing the same 5 kids in your section over and over is not the solution.
     
    #78
  29. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Flying around the country just so you don't have to play the same 5 kids is not the answer. We need to grow the game locally. How can a family that earns $45,000 a year fly around the country? Ain't gonna happen.
     
    #79
  30. coaching32yrs

    coaching32yrs Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    449
    I never understood parents and players obsession with national tournaments in the 12's, 14's, and 16's. When my players are 10-15 yrs old and they need some tougher matches against different players I play them up 1 or 2 age brackets in our section. Why travel across the country? Get them playing "adult" tennis as quickly as possible. 12 and 14 year old defensive tennis wins at those ages, but hinders long term development.
     
    #80
  31. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    I don't care that it was Hannity that wrote the letter so there's nothing to get over. I'm a Hannity fan I just don't share the same opinion with him when it comes to tennis.

    And we don't have the most accurate selection process now. Participation is often driven by the size of Mom or Dad's W-2. There are many top kids that don't travel to many of the national tournaments for this reason.
     
    #81
  32. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    COACH!!!!! You and I agree on something - finally! :)
     
    #82
  33. tennisforlife77

    tennisforlife77 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    there are a lot of things a family earning $45,000 can't do. I don't think we should build our national tennis development strategy around costless access to the sport. Local competition and playing up is not the answer..
     
    #83
  34. jigglypuff

    jigglypuff Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    318
    Nice roadmap... play up and maybe play a few local adult hacks and suddenly show up at Kalamazoo when they are 17 or 18 kicking butt?
     
    #84
  35. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    Local competition and playing up was definitely the answer in my house. Making tennis more affordable is a continuous agenda item in growing our sport. If you think that should be ignored, then i guess we just disagree.
     
    #85
  36. volleygirl

    volleygirl Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    404


    So do you want the guy take off the air? You do support "freedom of speech" dont you or are you one of those who only supports freedom of speech when you agree with whats being said?
     
    #86
  37. tennisforlife77

    tennisforlife77 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    not ignored , just not obsessed about..there are a lot of expenses associated with being a national standard tennis player - travel is just one of them...equipment, coaching, court time are all costly and families with resources will have an advantage. Shrinking the national schedule to 200-300 kids is going to exacerbate the problem in my opinion. The USTA should be sponsoring as many high level events regionally and nationally as there are players willing to play which judging by the alternate lists floating around there are.
     
    #87
  38. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    I respectfully disagree and I don't see USTA adding 200-300 more national tournaments anytime soon. I don't subscribe to the "If you build more tournaments they will come" approach. We need to grow the base of players nationally first.
     
    #88
  39. coaching32yrs

    coaching32yrs Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    449
    The adults top juniors should be hitting with are not local hacks. Like every area we have top college players home for the summer. Also, there are several former top colleges players in their 20's and 30's who are excellent. We are lucky in that we have a few players in their 50's who played on tour who still play at a high level in doubles. Many of these individuals are happy to play sets with a top junior and it does not cost.
     
    #89
  40. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469

    I disagree with you about the quality of you region versus others. But under the old system, it didn't matter. If you didn't get the endorsement but worked hard and got the points, you made it anyhow. Now it does. It's all inside politics and who can negotiate the best quota for there region. Yeah, that's going to make American tennis better.
     
    #90
  41. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    If somebody at Tenniseurope is smart they will see that the usta as handed them a great business opportunity. Nature abhors a vacuum.
     
    #91
  42. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    But this is a red herring that's already been shot down several times. The regions as defined are too big and geogrphically diverse that the new system could increase the amount of travel/flying, unless of course you live in Florida.
     
    #92
  43. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    Some people have more money than others and that will always be a factor. But no one is forcing anybody to anybody to go to these tournaments if they don't want to. In fact, decreasing the number of events increase the importance the ones that remain, and make it so the top players have to travel to these no matter where they are. Look, at the end of the day only the top six events count, so for families with top players but limited funds, more events, or at least the same as there is now, increase the probability of the events being closer.
     
    #93
  44. Alohajrtennis

    Alohajrtennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    469
    I don't see it happening either but somehow this argument keeps gets twisted into people wanting to increase the number of national tournaments, when all we want is to not decrease them. And they are growing the sport, investing huge amounts in TAUT while simultaneously reducing the opportunities at the next level. It's nuts.
     
    #94
  45. tennis5

    tennis5 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,290
    Same organization that got rid of the 12's for a bit........

    It did not work out well for that group of juniors as the guinea pig group.

    So, the USTA said oops with your kids of course......

    And changed it back.

    How can you have confidence in an organization that just makes heavy handed, radical decisions without consulting the actual people who make the system. And then after they mess up the whole tournament system ( boys 12, for example a few years ago), there is not even a logical explanation from them on why they took it away and why they reinstated it.

    I have yet to meet one person, junior, parent or coach ( except Chalk flew up - whose opinion I do consider as he actually has a junior who plays:) )who thinks the new 2014 changes are a good thing.

    The new 2014 system screws the kids who are from the cold weather, indoor bubble, Sept - May playing inside group.

    And for the kids ( and there are many) who give up soccer, baseball, etc at age 13 to play tennis as a full time sport, well that transition is quite difficult now........ Nice way for the USTA to kiss off the kids who might be athletically talented, but got to the sport too late....
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2012
    #95
  46. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    My kid is hurt by the bubble too, but in all fairness, we live in Florida so the opportunities to play are plentiful. One can definitely argue that my opinion is impacted by geography and I can't argue against that position. If we lived elsewhere, perhaps I'd think differently - dunno to be honest.
     
    #96
  47. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787
    I have no kids who aspire to be national player, not in tennis anyway.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2012
    #97
  48. t135

    t135 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    787


    10 and under tennis is America's best shot at getting participation in tennis up in the juniors.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2012
    #98
  49. chalkflewup

    chalkflewup Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,697
    ^^^
    Don't forget Imus.
     
    #99
  50. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida

    You must be the CEO of the USTA.
     

Share This Page