self rating differently for two different leagues

Discussion in 'Adult League & Tournament Talk' started by AR15, Sep 1, 2010.

  1. AR15

    AR15 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Gulf Coast, USA
    Interesting scenario in my area:

    A player self rated as a 3.0 for our local league (non-USTA league). The player had high school experience, but no college. He was good enough as an adult that he won all of his matches at 3.0 and was dq'd, and bumped to 3.5.

    The next season, this player signs up for a USTA membership and self rates as a 3.0. He signs up for a 6.5 combo team, and is winning all of his matches with the 3.5 he's playing with.

    1. Do you think the player was being dishonest registering for USTA as a 3.0?
    2. Do you consider this cheating?
    3. Can you think of any reason this player might have (in his mind) to justify rating himself as a 3.0 in USTA?
    4. Would you protest this player if you were on an opposing team?
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2010
    #1
  2. polski

    polski Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    633
    Location:
    Florida
    1) YES
    2) YES
    3) NO
    4) Maybe
    - I would most likely just make sure that he knows that I know what he is doing. If he's a jerk, I would protest. If he can justify what he is doing, I'd let it slide. Life's too short.
     
    #2
  3. J_R_B

    J_R_B Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,638
    Location:
    Newtown, PA
    What kind of league did he originally sign up for and how does the competition compare to USTA? I say that because we have a local league here that uses the same USTA nomenclature (3.0 - 5.5), but the ratings are at least a full point different that USTA ratings. In other words, I am a solid 4.0 in USTA, but I play in the 5.5 level local league. If anyone thnks that I am cheating by not self-rating at 5.5 in USTA is crazy. I would not get a single game from legitimate 5.5 USTA players.

    If the person registered for USTA and self-rated at 3.0, got bumped to 3.5, and then re-registered the next year at 3.0 under a different name or address or whatever, that is clearly cheating. Otherwise, it's not 100% clear.
     
    #3
  4. AR15

    AR15 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Gulf Coast, USA
    It's a very large local league, that covers my area, similar to ALTA in Atlanta. 85% of the players in this area play in both leagues
     
    #4
  5. catfish

    catfish Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    If this player self-rated and played in USTA adult league, he generated a year end computer rating. That computer rating is valid for three years. If he self-rated the next year, he must have done it under a different name and USTA membership. Having multiple memberships/ratings for the same person is circumventing the system, and most definitely cheating. See USTA National Rules below. Some Sectional rules address this type of situation. I suggest that the OP review his or her Sectional rules.

    3.01D Entry. A player without a NTRP published level must self-rate to enter the
    program. A player with a current NTRP published level must use that rating to enter the program.
    3.01D(1) Players entering the USTA League Tennis Program are defined as having an
    NTRP published level on file in TennisLink or as new/returning players without a NTRP published
    level. Rating levels are derived in accordance with USTA NTRP Computer Rating System
    Procedures. Once a player is assigned a NTRP published level, it is valid for up to three years or
    until another NTRP published level is generated. (See Valid Year-end NTRP Published Level
    Chart – inside back cover)
    3.01D(2) Players who do not have a NTRP published level on file in TennisLink shall
    self-rate in accordance with the National Tennis Rating Program (NTRP) Guidelines and
    complete the self-rating process on TennisLink when registering for a team. Failure to do so, or
    omission of information regarding a player’s tennis history, will subject the player, the captain,
    and/or others who condoned inaccurate self-rating to sanctions and disqualification.
     
    #5
  6. J_R_B

    J_R_B Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,638
    Location:
    Newtown, PA
    But do they generally play at the same level? In other words, are 3.0 and 3.5 really equivalents in the two leagues?
     
    #6
  7. AR15

    AR15 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Gulf Coast, USA
    If 85% of the same players play in both leagues, they are not altering their skill levels for one league over the other.
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2010
    #7
  8. Bedrock

    Bedrock Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    416
    1) NO
    2) NO
    3) Found the level when he can win. (However 3.0 indicates no level at all)
    4) Inappropriate question. You cannot support opposite side at any circumstances.
     
    #8
  9. AR15

    AR15 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Gulf Coast, USA
    Thanks for the reply, but can you explain your answer to question #1? If the player had been found to be a 3.5 in one league, how do you justify that player self rating as a 3.0 a few months later in the USTA league?

    And your answer to #3 is quite peculiar. When the USTA defines the various levels, how do you say "3.0 indicates no level at all?"
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2010
    #9
  10. polski

    polski Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    633
    Location:
    Florida
    I don't think you understood his question 4. He is asking if you faced an opponent that did this, "would you protest?"

    It can't be inappropriate because this is the only party who would have justifiable cause to complain. And this would not be supporting the opposite side, but instead confronting it.
     
    #10
  11. Bedrock

    Bedrock Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    416
    I did informed once a tournament director about a player who signed up for tournament ignoring the rules and that player was not allowed to play. (But there were very clear definitions about who acceptable for participating in tournament)
    In this particular case I do not see which rule this player has broken. USTA allowed him to get in 4.0 therefore I assume it is OK.
     
    #11

Share This Page