Should the Olympics be a best 3 out of 5 format?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by FedExpress117, Jul 31, 2012.

  1. FedExpress117

    FedExpress117 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    232
    It comes once every 4 years, and it's not a Grand Slam but it's still more important than a Masters Series tournament. I think they should to give an advantage to top players who benefit more from having that format. I would personally hate to see a top player like Fed or Djoker not have the chance to be down 2 sets to 1 or 0-2 (which they have been many times) and make a comeback. Thoughts?
     
    #1
  2. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,103
    Location:
    Toronto
    Nope...it would be even more tiring for them in the hectic season.

    Peaking o a 5 setter would mess up their energy tank for the US open!
     
    #2
  3. Paul Murphy

    Paul Murphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,792
    No thanks.
    Not a fan of tennis at the Olympics.
    Roll on the USO and those lovely hardcourts.
     
    #3
  4. bluetrain4

    bluetrain4 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,754
    Definitely not. The final is best of 5, isn't it? That's enough.

    I always thought a more interesting format should be used. It's just like any other tournament, though obviously there's the thrill of the Olympics and playing for ones country.
     
    #4
  5. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,309
    Should only be for under 21 players.
     
    #5
  6. TeflonTom

    TeflonTom Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    920
    not accordin 2 the atp rankings points

    olympics is completely irrelevant as a tennis tournament. its only important in terms o the individual athletes wanting 2 be an olympic champion. therefore no point comparing it to slams, masters, etc

    shouldnt be on the olympic calendar at all, really
     
    #6
  7. Federererer

    Federererer Banned

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    695
    Olympics tennis just appears weird. Like a fringe tournament where all the nobodies play, but now happens to be filled with big names. I dunno, just something less exciting about Olympics vs regular tennis tourneys including some of the really important Masters
     
    #7
  8. TheBoom

    TheBoom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,341
    Location:
    Kingwood texas
    I was actually thinking about this earlier and I think 5 sets is a bit excessive for the Olympics if you think about it a lot of the events aren't all that long especially track events and swimming a best of 5 set match can last for hours even days (case and point isner vs mahut) a best of 3 seems the most logical and it is short enough to get fans outside of the tennis community to come and support the players because they won't be in a chair for 5 hours just a thought
     
    #8
  9. OldFedIsOld

    OldFedIsOld Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    856
    Location:
    2D plane of existence
    Masters = 1000 points = best of 3 sets.

    Olympics = 750 points = best of 3 sets, excluding the finals.

    WTF is even more important because of the 1500 points lol.
     
    #9
  10. YellowBall77

    YellowBall77 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2012
    Messages:
    258
    I think the Olympics is worth more than 750 points mathematically, because the points do not have to be defended.
     
    #10
  11. Sentinel

    Sentinel Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    29,078
    Location:
    Brave New World
    Let it be best of 3, so top players can play the doubles, too.

    IF the slams could move to a Bo3 format, we c/would see Noel, Fred and Ralph played doubles too.
     
    #11
  12. wilkinru

    wilkinru Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    995
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I wish they had a 3rd set tiebreaker too.

    This 23-25 business in the 3rd is stupid.

    Just treat it like a ATP tourney across the board.
     
    #12
  13. Tennis_Hands

    Tennis_Hands Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,694
    Location:
    Inside the service box - the business end
    That.

    And the current format is the maximum I can endure.

    That tournament has never been anything special for me. And it will not be in the future.
     
    #13
  14. Dave M

    Dave M Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,941
    Location:
    England
    I don't think it should be a best of 5, i don't actually think it should have points personally,if they don't want to play in it for the experiance of being in the olympics then they shouldn't play.
     
    #14
  15. Enigma_87

    Enigma_87 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,360
    2 things I'd change:

    1. Include a 3rd set tie braker
    2. no atp points for this event as you can't defend it next year.
     
    #15
  16. Russeljones

    Russeljones G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,633
    If it were 3/5 the regular season would have to be reshuffled around that to allow for the added strain on the tennis players. I think that's too complicated to arrange in this day and age.
     
    #16
  17. Strobe Lights

    Strobe Lights Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    531
    It would mean a best of 5 tournament each month for four months in a row. If it was best of 5 then it would be over two weeks and would fit even less into the tennis calendar. It would not work.

    I still don't think tennis should be in the Olympics. Nor should football or golf, which will join in 2016. These are sports that have their own big tournaments and history. It is almost embarrassing how much more important Wimbledon is than the Olympics for tennis. That shouldn't be the case for an event in the Olympics Games.

    Obviously the prestige will increase if Djokovic wins and even more so if Federer wins. Nadal winning added prestige as they could now refer to Agassi and Nadal as Olympic champions and gloss over the likes of Rosset and Massu. If big names continue to win it, then its standing in tennis will increase.

    Talking of 5 sets though, they should definitely change the final of the YEC back to a 5-setter. I understand them changing the Masters Series finals, but they should not have touched the YEC.
     
    #17
  18. TennisBatman

    TennisBatman Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    575
    The best of 3 format is used to save time for the tournament and energy for the players. Right now, it is best of 5 for the men's finals only and best of 3 for all other matches. As we saw yesterday, though, the lack of a tiebreaker in the deciding set can make some matches like the Raonic-Tsonga match to last much longer than ordinary 3-set matches.

    A good compromise would be to make it best of 5 for the semi-final, final, and bronze matches. The reason for this is that the top few players may be so close in ability (as is the case with Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic), that they deserve the fair competition offered by the best of 5 format, at least for the semi-finals. Djokovic might have had a better chance in his semi-final against Nadal in 2008, if this were the case.
     
    #18
  19. scineram

    scineram Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,234
    Location:
    Hellhole Hungary
    Tennis should be booted from Olympics.
     
    #19
  20. Start da Game

    Start da Game Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    982
    i think the format is just about right with the final being best of 5 sets......that makes it lesser than slams and davis cup and better than masters tournaments......
     
    #20
  21. kelawai

    kelawai Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    252
    Professional players shouldn't be allowed to play in the Olympic.
     
    #21

Share This Page