Since Nadal Lost

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by JohnnySpot, Sep 14, 2009.

?

If Federer Won

  1. Illegitimate win

    4 vote(s)
    11.8%
  2. Legitimate Win

    21 vote(s)
    61.8%
  3. Lucky

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  4. Because of a Joke Draw

    2 vote(s)
    5.9%
  5. Hamster are rabid

    6 vote(s)
    17.6%
  1. JohnnySpot

    JohnnySpot New User

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    85
    Does that mean

    - if Federer wins, it is an "illegitimate win" because he didn't play Nadal?

    - if Federer wins, it is a "legitimate win" because Del Potro beat Nadal fair-and-square?

    - if Federer loses the US Open, it's because he is not the GOAT

    - if Federer wins the US Open, it's because he is lucky to get a "joke draw".

    - if a hamster bit your leg, you would die from rabies?

    Discuss!
     
    #1
  2. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    Joke draw and asterikses all over the place obv.

    :rolleyes:
     
    #2
  3. Haasquet

    Haasquet Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    215
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Oh, geez, another one of these threads...

    there are just so many factors that you can't really give a yes-or-no answer. I mean, does the hamster have rabies? Is there 100% certainty that you will contract rabies by being bitten by an afflicted animal. Could the hamster teeth even break the skin?

    Wait... is this a trick question? Does the person being bitten already have rabies before the hamster bite?

    Seriously, dude, I'm getting sick of all the hamster threads. They're killing me!
     
    #3
  4. mcshift

    mcshift Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    colorado
    Legitimate win all the way...i hate it how people are like federer winning the FO was not legit since nadal wasnt in the final. He doesnt have to beat nadal to legitimize a grand slam win.
     
    #4
  5. tudwell

    tudwell Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,408
    Hamster are rabid
     
    #5
  6. ArrowSmith

    ArrowSmith Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    427
    It's never legit unless he can beat 100% Nadal at the French Open. Any thing else is not legit. In fact there should be only one match held a year in the ATP, French Open Final Roger vs Rafa. It's a 2-man tour right?
     
    #6
  7. Fedfan1234

    Fedfan1234 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    328
    Actually it means that Nadal's slam win at the AO 2009 is illegitimate!! He never played Del Potro, he would have been destroyed.
     
    #7
  8. mcshift

    mcshift Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    colorado
    see people like you dont understand that theres people other than fed and nadal in the ATP... a win is a win no matter who it is. so your gonna come up with excuses for nadal not being %100 at the FO...well last year Fed wasnt %100 from having mono and missing many training sessions in dubai before Wimbledon.
     
    #8
  9. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,057
    Illegitimate win - the depth of the men's tour is so low right now that Federer can beat his opponent with his back to the net and hitting between the legs. Nadal, the only real contender, was injured and barely able to serve or move.

    We will have to wait for a healthy Nadal to get some life back into the tour.
     
    #9
  10. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    When Fed had some trouble, and wasn't playing to his full capacity, did you consider Nadal's wins in the weak field also fluky? How about his Olympic Gold medal for instance. Was that illegitimate too? He beat GONZALEZ in the final!!!


    I didn't think so.. :rolleyes:
     
    #10
  11. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    Arrowsmith was being sarcastic
     
    #11
  12. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,057
    7-13 is not a fluke thing. Defeats in 3 Slam finals is not a fluke thing.

    I will say this: Federer deserves his wins as it is not his fault that Nadal was injured. But you can't help feeling that the rest of the guys are lacking in something, maybe something in their head.
     
    #12
  13. bruce38

    bruce38 Banned

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,850
    Excellent point!
     
    #13
  14. bruce38

    bruce38 Banned

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,850
    Nadal getting to the Quarters losing only a couple of sets is proof that the injuries did not affect him that badly. Beating an on-fire Gonzo cannot be done if you are injured, not even Nadal. Then losing to DelPo, sorry I mean getting crushed, simply proves he was outplayed on his worst surface. Meanwhile Fed manages to get to the finals of his worst surface year after year allowing Nadal to improve H2H. Hence h2h is meaningless.
     
    #14
  15. poplar

    poplar Guest

    Nadal fans are funny. They don't mean to be.
     
    #15
  16. lessthanjake

    lessthanjake Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    428
    I will say this is a bit different than the French Open. Nadal has Federer's number on clay. I would favor Federer to win if they met at the US Open. So it's not illegitimate at all if he wins it without playing Nadal.
     
    #16
  17. DonBudge

    DonBudge New User

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Messages:
    27
    can't blame roger for nadal loses, come on! be smarter please
     
    #17

Share This Page