Slam winning percentages for Big 3

Discussion in 'Pro Match Results and Discussion' started by Agassifan, Jan 29, 2012.

  1. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,633
    Nole : 5/7 = 71%
    Fed : 16/23 = 70%
    Rafa : 10/15 = 67%
     
    #1
  2. nikdom

    nikdom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,725
    Location:
    Tennisville
    Juan Martin Del Potro = 1/1 = 100%
     
    #2
  3. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984
    Roddick

    1/5 20%
     
    #3
  4. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984
    Safin - 2/3 - 67%
     
    #4
  5. rhubarb

    rhubarb Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,679
    Safin had 2/4 so 50%. Same for Lleyton Hewitt.
    Ferrero 1/3 33%..

    Quite amazing that we only have 7 current ATP players who have a singles slam.
     
    #5
  6. Tennis sensation

    Tennis sensation Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    5,141
    Location:
    Lost
    This clearly shows that JMDP is the GOAT :)
     
    #6
  7. TennisLovaLova

    TennisLovaLova Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,124
    JMDP is indeed the goat
    those stats mean nothing before one ends his career...
     
    #7
  8. Crazy man

    Crazy man Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    693
    Nah, Safin would have been 4/4 under normal circumstances; He should have beaten Johansson but choked and was a corpse at the AO 2004 final. Should have won both.
     
    #8
  9. Tammo

    Tammo Banned

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    3,868
    Murray 0/3 - 0%. :)
     
    #9
  10. Oceansize

    Oceansize Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    350
    Not bad, however, Fed was 100% from his first 7 finals.
     
    #10
  11. gregor.b

    gregor.b Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,202
    Location:
    Brisvegas
    Good point. I think it all goes down hill after that. Especially as you get older and the new young brigade take over.
     
    #11
  12. AM95

    AM95 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,241
    what a stupid stat this is..
     
    #12
  13. dudeski

    dudeski Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,436
    Nole made Nadal mentally weaker than Federer. That's too funny. He is breaking one Nadal myth after another. I guess now he can go after Nadal's 5 set winning %.:)
     
    #13
  14. dudeski

    dudeski Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,436
    Sorry to break it to you but Federer was GOATing around at 2004 AO and had match point in 2005 as well.
     
    #14
  15. celoft

    celoft Guest

    True.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
     
    #15
  16. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    8,276
    Yes, he is equal with Andres Gomez who also has a 100% slam final success rate.
     
    #16
  17. iriraz

    iriraz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,978
    Kuerten was 3/3 at the French
     
    #17
  18. Crazy man

    Crazy man Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    693
    Sorry to break it to you, but Federer wasn't #1 at that time. Safin managed to beat Roddick (who was ranked #1) and Agassi (top 5) both in 5 sets. Safin managed to make two sets competetive running on an empty tank. I'd go with Safin if he was fully fit. AO 2005 SF, damn, that was a match. TBH with you if Safin and Federer both played well the match would come down to a few points. But yeah if Safin hadn't have had such a tough draw it would have been an epic match for sure.
     
    #18
  19. statto

    statto Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    877
    Location:
    England
    The stats are wrong. Those are slam final numbers. Actual stats (as compared to the GOAT in this category):

    Bjorn Borg 11/27 = 41%
    Rafael Nadal 10/31 = 32%
    Roger Federer 16/51 = 31%
    Novak Djokovic: 5/29 = 17%
     
    #19
  20. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Toronto
    Safinhad another 5 setter before Agassi and Roddick. He got pass Roddick.....Agassi should have won in 3. Safin was looking tired even then.
     
    #20
  21. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,448
    The Sampras conversion rate is 14/18. 77.78%, and 7/7 at Wimbledon - 100%.

     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2012
    #21
  22. spiderman123

    spiderman123 Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    843
    He is already doing that.

    I loved how he made everyone believe that Nadal won the fourth set on his willpower. It was Nole going after his 5 set stat. That coming back after being a break down in fifth was a nice touch.
     
    #22
  23. Fedex

    Fedex Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,876
    Location:
    Dundee
    #23
  24. Crazy man

    Crazy man Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    693
    Hardly surprising, he missed virtually 2003 and his first tournament is a slam. The guy did brilliantly to make the finals.
     
    #24
  25. Towser83

    Towser83 Legend

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    9,715
    Safin was a great player but didn't beat Federer too many times, he needed to really bring out his insane level to do it, so I wouldn't say he should have won in 2004, but yeah could have made it tighter. The other time he lost in the final I think he was out partying or something the night before? What a shame, but also gotta love Marat for his personality.
     
    #25
  26. Crazy man

    Crazy man Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    693
    It could have gone either way if Safin wasn't a corpse. By the way, there are many players like Djokovic and Murray who have lost against a decrepid passive Roddick in slams. Safin was able to beat a prime Roddick who was #1 after having nearly a full year off. Think of that. Safin wasn't clubbing the night before, but let's just say his attitude and off-court life costed Safin. He choked the final but definately a brilliant career for someone who had so many problems.
     
    #26
  27. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,527
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    They're not WRONG, they're just different stats than the ones you posted.
    You posted Slam wins vs Slams played. They posted Slam wins in Slam FINALS played.
     
    #27
  28. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    8,276
    Well, the Gomez example is one of daftness. A match comparison with a sample size of over 250 points is far more indicative of something depending on how/what you're interpreting it - which can be the death or life of a line of debate.
     
    #28
  29. Towser83

    Towser83 Legend

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    9,715
    Yeah I remembered that Safin hadn't played much towards the end of 2003, lost a lot of matches and was amazing he was even in the final in 2004.
     
    #29
  30. statto

    statto Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    877
    Location:
    England
    Read the thread title: "Slam winning percentages for the Big 3", not "Slam final winning percentages for the Big 3"

    It may seem like a small difference, but when it turns the outcome on its head it's obviously not.
     
    #30
  31. Benhur

    Benhur Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,561
    And when I first saw the threat title, before reading the posts, I thought it meant winning percentage of matches played in slams.
     
    #31
  32. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984

    Corpse ..really ???:shock:

    Have you ever watched the match?
     
    #32
  33. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984
    Roger had also 10/31 after 2007 AO ... so roger consistency after 2003 wimbledon caught up child prodigy nadal!!
     
    #33
  34. Russeljones

    Russeljones G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    15,494
    Easiest way is to jump off a cliff. Drink something first if you lack the guts for it.
     
    #34
  35. tennis_pro

    tennis_pro Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,612
    Location:
    Berlin
    1. Pete Sampras 77.78 14–4
    2. Novak Djokovic 71.43 5–2
    3. Roger Federer 69.57 16–7
    4. Björn Borg 68.75 11–5
    5. Rafael Nadal 66.67 10–5
    6. John McEnroe 63.64 7–4
    7. Mats Wilander 63.64 7–4
    8. Boris Becker 60.00 6–4
    9. Stefan Edberg 54.55 6–5
    10. Jimmy Connors 53.33 8–7
    10. Andre Agassi 53.33 8–7
     
    #35
  36. Docalex007

    Docalex007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,659
    Location:
    London/Berlin
    Anybody who thinks this is a relevant stat where a higher percentage is better is nuts.

    Which is better?

    20/1 = 95% (20 slam titles, 1 runner-up)

    or

    20/8 = 71% (20 slam titles, 8 runner-up)

    Clearly the second has the better statistics.
     
    #36
  37. ChanceEncounter

    ChanceEncounter Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,463
    Yeah. This is pretty gross misuse of statistics to make a point.

    Statistics aren't wrong. People who use them incorrectly are.
     
    #37
  38. DjokovicForTheWin

    DjokovicForTheWin Banned

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    5,808
    Holy crap Nadal has only been to 3 fewer slam finals than Sampras????? Wow Sampras was a lot worse than I thought.
     
    #38
  39. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,819
    All bow down to Nole, don't worry he won't wear any stupid jackets or pick anything.
     
    #39
  40. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984
    yaa..he will only rip-off his shirt after the match stupidly :p
     
    #40
  41. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,633
    The stat isn't stupid. interpretations are.

    5/15 >>>>> 5/5
     
    #41
  42. jokinla

    jokinla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,691
    Nice one!!!!
     
    #42
  43. jokinla

    jokinla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,691
    LOL, best of all!!
     
    #43
  44. Hitman

    Hitman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    18,029
    Just after the FO last year, Nadal was dominating this stat. Amazing what a few months can do, now he is actually below Federer. I didn't really think that would be possible, with his high rate of success in big matches....then Djokovic stood up from the ashes.
     
    #44
  45. Seany

    Seany Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,444
    Amazing how few current players have even played in a slam final, let alone won one. What a horrible era to be in if you are not one of the top 4 guys lol.
     
    #45
  46. rhubarb

    rhubarb Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,679
    Yep, just 7 winners and 7 others who have been runner up only, if I've counted correctly. That's mostly down to Federer and Nadal of course - 38 final spots between them out of the last 75 finals - wow!
     
    #46
  47. MG1

    MG1 Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    984
    Murray would be always

    0/N=0

    N=No. of slam finals

    N will vary but final outcome will be always fixed.its constant.
     
    #47
  48. TopFH

    TopFH Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,494
    He only said GOATing, not being No.1.
     
    #48
  49. tennis_pro

    tennis_pro Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,612
    Location:
    Berlin
    Fed would stand at 15-3 if he failed to make a single French Open final in his career. Turns out if he sucked on clay like Sampras, he'd actually be a better player.:)
     
    #49
  50. devila

    devila Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,743
    if nadal had a day's rest at wimbledon and if novak and roddick hadn't choked on set points and break points, poor fed'd never have his praise for beating sampras' slam total.
     
    #50

Share This Page